Tax Bill is a loser
- bluehenbillk
- Level4
- Posts: 7660
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
- I am a fan of: elaware
- Location: East Coast/Hawaii
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
There are more economical hazards to this plan.
Two come to mind very easily.
1- Less Spending negates any job impact. When people pay more $ in taxes that's less $ they're going to spend elsewhere. That means less revenue coming into companies which means they need to cut costs (jobs).
2- Housing bubble risk - there is less incentive to buy a house moving forward, so less new homes will be built & the supply of houses on the market (you'll really see this next spring) will start to far exceed the demand. What this means is it's a buyer's market - back to the days of low-balling existing homeowners and watching your home value drop. As long as you're not selling in the near future you won't really get hurt, but if you just bought you'll kick yourself & if you're selling next in the next year or two you just learned you'll get less.
Two come to mind very easily.
1- Less Spending negates any job impact. When people pay more $ in taxes that's less $ they're going to spend elsewhere. That means less revenue coming into companies which means they need to cut costs (jobs).
2- Housing bubble risk - there is less incentive to buy a house moving forward, so less new homes will be built & the supply of houses on the market (you'll really see this next spring) will start to far exceed the demand. What this means is it's a buyer's market - back to the days of low-balling existing homeowners and watching your home value drop. As long as you're not selling in the near future you won't really get hurt, but if you just bought you'll kick yourself & if you're selling next in the next year or two you just learned you'll get less.
Make Delaware Football Great Again
- Chizzang
- Level5
- Posts: 19273
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Soon to be Eden Prairie...
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
Chizzang wrote:
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
I get what you're saying about same job for different pay because you're in a high cost area, but IMO that's really irrelevant. The tax code views somebody who makes $X as rich or poor regardless of where they live. The mortgage interest deduction is an easy rallying point for the tax the rich crowd. Surely anyone living in a house that requires more than a $500,000 mortgage is rich.CAA Flagship wrote:A dollar isn't. But compensation for similar work/services isn't the same either.OL FU wrote:
Well first like I said there is nothing you can do about it but it isn't a matter of higher compensation to do the same work. The tax code is based on an absolute dollar value. So Let's say I make $100,000 in South Carolina and it cost me $35,000 to live and I pay $25,000 in taxes. I'm $40,000 ahead. I live in NYC make $100,000 and it cost me $60,000 to live and I pay $30,000 in taxes. I'm $10,000 ahead.
Like I said there is no way around this because if we attempted to adjust federal income taxes based on cost of living there would certainly be a revolt of the highest magnitude. But still a dollar ain't worth the same in every geographical location.
A person making $100k in SC is not necessarily doing the same job as a person making $100k in NYC.
$750,000 here...
$450,000 in Wichita...
-
- Level3
- Posts: 4333
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
- I am a fan of: Furman
- Location: Greenville SC
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
Exactly the tax code looks at a dollar as a dollar no matter where you live89Hen wrote:I get what you're saying about same job for different pay because you're in a high cost area, but IMO that's really irrelevant. The tax code views somebody who makes $X as rich or poor regardless of where they live. The mortgage interest deduction is an easy rallying point for the tax the rich crowd. Surely anyone living in a house that requires more than a $500,000 mortgage is rich.CAA Flagship wrote: A dollar isn't. But compensation for similar work/services isn't the same either.
A person making $100k in SC is not necessarily doing the same job as a person making $100k in NYC.
$750,000 here...
$450,000 in Wichita...
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
And anyone who says the change wouldn't tank the housing market is a fool. I have a buyer under contract that called the agent this morning because they are having second thoughts due to the proposed tax bill. Not kidding.
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
One line of it does.OL FU wrote: Exactly the tax code looks at a dollar as a dollar no matter where you live
But combine that line with the rest of it and it doesn't. For simple example:
Make 100k in NYC. Pay 5k in state and local taxes and use deduction. Taxable income now 95k. Pay fed taxes.
Make 100k in FL. Pay no state and local taxes. Taxable income is 100k. Pay fed taxes.
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
CAA Flagship wrote:One line of it does.OL FU wrote: Exactly the tax code looks at a dollar as a dollar no matter where you live
But combine that line with the rest of it and it doesn't. For simple example:
Make 100k in NYC. Pay 5k in state and local taxes and use deduction. Taxable income now 95k. Pay fed taxes.
Make 100k in FL. Pay no state and local taxes. Taxable income is 100k. Pay fed taxes.
-
- Level3
- Posts: 4333
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
- I am a fan of: Furman
- Location: Greenville SC
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
tCAA Flagship wrote:One line of it does.OL FU wrote: Exactly the tax code looks at a dollar as a dollar no matter where you live
But combine that line with the rest of it and it doesn't. For simple example:
Make 100k in NYC. Pay 5k in state and local taxes and use deduction. Taxable income now 95k. Pay fed taxes.
Make 100k in FL. Pay no state and local taxes. Taxable income is 100k. Pay fed taxes.
Which doesn’t come close to offsetting the cost of living
-
- Level3
- Posts: 4333
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
- I am a fan of: Furman
- Location: Greenville SC
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
And that was my point. That and other deductions helps with the cost of living issue
- Chizzang
- Level5
- Posts: 19273
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Soon to be Eden Prairie...
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
I did mention Trump would tank the housing market...89Hen wrote:And anyone who says the change wouldn't tank the housing market is a fool. I have a buyer under contract that called the agent this morning because they are having second thoughts due to the proposed tax bill. Not kidding.
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
He'll probably tank the deficit too with this plan, but not tank it in a good way.Chizzang wrote:I did mention Trump would tank the housing market...89Hen wrote:And anyone who says the change wouldn't tank the housing market is a fool. I have a buyer under contract that called the agent this morning because they are having second thoughts due to the proposed tax bill. Not kidding.
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
Why does this matter re: fed taxes?OL FU wrote:tCAA Flagship wrote: One line of it does.
But combine that line with the rest of it and it doesn't. For simple example:
Make 100k in NYC. Pay 5k in state and local taxes and use deduction. Taxable income now 95k. Pay fed taxes.
Make 100k in FL. Pay no state and local taxes. Taxable income is 100k. Pay fed taxes.
Which doesn’t come close to offsetting the cost of living
In reality, that 100k job in FL pays 120k in NYC. The increased salary takes into account the cost of living which includes taxes. Let the market figure this out. The fed govt shouldn't be concerned with the differences between states. Let the states figure this out.
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
You obviously don't get it. The increased salary takes care of the increased cost of living. I have to earn more to live here and I pay taxes on what I earn. You are saying it's OK for the government to tax me at a higher rate because I earn more, even though my "extra money" you seem to think I have sitting around is going towards more expensive housing, more expensive groceries, more expensive tuition, etc...CAA Flagship wrote:Why does this matter re: fed taxes?OL FU wrote:t
Which doesn’t come close to offsetting the cost of living
In reality, that 100k job in FL pays 120k in NYC. The increased salary takes into account the cost of living which includes taxes. Let the market figure this out. The fed govt shouldn't be concerned with the differences between states. Let the states figure this out.
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
But the increased cost of living INCLUDES the tax implications. You just got used to it and forgot about it.89Hen wrote:You obviously don't get it. The increased salary takes care of the increased cost of living. I have to earn more to live here and I pay taxes on what I earn. You are saying it's OK for the government to tax me at a higher rate because I earn more, even though my "extra money" you seem to think I have sitting around is going towards more expensive housing, more expensive groceries, more expensive tuition, etc...CAA Flagship wrote: Why does this matter re: fed taxes?
In reality, that 100k job in FL pays 120k in NYC. The increased salary takes into account the cost of living which includes taxes. Let the market figure this out. The fed govt shouldn't be concerned with the differences between states. Let the states figure this out.
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
You do realize the federal government pays people at the same grade different wages depending on where they work, no?CAA Flagship wrote:Why does this matter re: fed taxes?OL FU wrote:t
Which doesn’t come close to offsetting the cost of living
In reality, that 100k job in FL pays 120k in NYC. The increased salary takes into account the cost of living which includes taxes. Let the market figure this out. The fed govt shouldn't be concerned with the differences between states. Let the states figure this out.
I get a 27.1% kicker for working in DC.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
Yes. What does that have to do with this?93henfan wrote:You do realize the federal government pays people at the same grade different wages depending on where they work, no?CAA Flagship wrote: Why does this matter re: fed taxes?
In reality, that 100k job in FL pays 120k in NYC. The increased salary takes into account the cost of living which includes taxes. Let the market figure this out. The fed govt shouldn't be concerned with the differences between states. Let the states figure this out.
I get a 27.1% kicker for working in DC.
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
You said "let the market figure it out". In the case of wages, the federal government disagrees. They believe geography matters in that instance. The point others are making is that the tax code hasn't caught up to that concept.CAA Flagship wrote:Yes. What does that have to do with this?93henfan wrote:
You do realize the federal government pays people at the same grade different wages depending on where they work, no?
I get a 27.1% kicker for working in DC.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
No. The market is the wage market. The govt figured it out just like most mult-state corps.93henfan wrote:You said "let the market figure it out". In the case of wages, the federal government disagrees. They believe geography matters in that instance. The point others are making is that the tax code hasn't caught up to that concept.CAA Flagship wrote: Yes. What does that have to do with this?
Now where is it that the tax code hasn't figured it out?
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
NO IT DOES NOT. If you were right, I would get another pay increase because of the federal tax plan about to go into effect.CAA Flagship wrote:But the increased cost of living INCLUDES the tax implications. You just got used to it and forgot about it.89Hen wrote: You obviously don't get it. The increased salary takes care of the increased cost of living. I have to earn more to live here and I pay taxes on what I earn. You are saying it's OK for the government to tax me at a higher rate because I earn more, even though my "extra money" you seem to think I have sitting around is going towards more expensive housing, more expensive groceries, more expensive tuition, etc...
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
Cost of living is something the wage market should concern itself with. The tax code should have nothing to do with cost of living adjustments.89Hen wrote:NO IT DOES NOT. If you were right, I would get another pay increase because of the federal tax plan about to go into effect.CAA Flagship wrote: But the increased cost of living INCLUDES the tax implications. You just got used to it and forgot about it.
And yes, if you get dinged on a tax law change, your employer would have to consider making an adjustment to your compensation as a cost of living increase, just like they do with inflation.
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
CAA Flagship wrote:Cost of living is something the wage market should concern itself with. The tax code should have nothing to do with cost of living adjustments.89Hen wrote: NO IT DOES NOT. If you were right, I would get another pay increase because of the federal tax plan about to go into effect.
And yes, if you get dinged on a tax law change, your employer would have to consider making an adjustment to your compensation as a cost of living increase, just like they do with inflation.
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
Flaggy, let me ask you this... why does Fannie/Freddie, FHA and VA all have different loan limits for different counties? Why not just one limit for everywhere? The housing market will figure it out.
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38526
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
Give up?89Hen wrote:CAA Flagship wrote: Cost of living is something the wage market should concern itself with. The tax code should have nothing to do with cost of living adjustments.
And yes, if you get dinged on a tax law change, your employer would have to consider making an adjustment to your compensation as a cost of living increase, just like they do with inflation.
-
- Level3
- Posts: 4333
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
- I am a fan of: Furman
- Location: Greenville SC
Re: Tax Bill is a loser
So when is the next music pollCAA Flagship wrote:But the increased cost of living INCLUDES the tax implications. You just got used to it and forgot about it.89Hen wrote: You obviously don't get it. The increased salary takes care of the increased cost of living. I have to earn more to live here and I pay taxes on what I earn. You are saying it's OK for the government to tax me at a higher rate because I earn more, even though my "extra money" you seem to think I have sitting around is going towards more expensive housing, more expensive groceries, more expensive tuition, etc...