Page 1 of 2

SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:47 pm
by 93henfan

Re: RE: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:00 pm
by SeattleGriz
You mean "The Muslim Ban". Media just can't help themselves.

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:15 pm
by kalm
I feel safer already. :thumb:

Re: RE: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:35 pm
by Grizalltheway
SeattleGriz wrote:
You mean "The Muslim Ban". Media just can't help themselves.
So they're concerned about Middle Eastern Christians coming here?

Re: RE: Re: RE: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:23 pm
by SeattleGriz
Grizalltheway wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:You mean "The Muslim Ban". Media just can't help themselves.
So they're concerned about Middle Eastern Christians coming here?
No, the fact they left off N Korea and Venezuela when they listed the countries.

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:37 pm
by Ivytalk
So only Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg and The Unwise Latina dissented from the Order. Interesting.

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:43 pm
by CID1990
There's so much that pretty much everybody gets wrong about this travel "ban"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:11 pm
by Chizzang
I've got no problem with it...

:nod:

But,
It's a snowflake Ban if Saudi Arabia isn't on it...

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:21 pm
by SDHornet
Chizzang wrote:I've got no problem with it...

:nod:

But,
It's a snowflake Ban if Saudi Arabia isn't on it...
:nod:

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:57 pm
by CID1990
Chizzang wrote:I've got no problem with it...

:nod:

But,
It's a snowflake Ban if Saudi Arabia isn't on it...
I would have agreed with you a year ago - and after the new king either a) cleans out the wahabbis or b) gets his head chopped off - I may agree with you again

but one major difference between SA and the countries on the list is that post-9/11 they have a pretty good intel infrastructure and they cooperate with our people. So we are able to simply refuse visas to the "bad" Saudis - no ban needed

The next couple years are going to be very interesting in Saudi Arabia


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:13 am
by bluehenbillk
I'm infinitely more interested in their ruling on sports gambling.

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:15 am
by CAA Flagship
bluehenbillk wrote:I'm infinitely more interested in their ruling on sports gambling.
:nod: :nod:

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 8:27 am
by GannonFan
CAA Flagship wrote:
bluehenbillk wrote:I'm infinitely more interested in their ruling on sports gambling.
:nod: :nod:
The countdown is basically on. Sports gambling will be allowed anywhere and everywhere. State governments should be prepping now so that they can go live as soon as the ruling comes down in the spring.

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 3:51 pm
by Chizzang
GannonFan wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: :nod: :nod:
The countdown is basically on. Sports gambling will be allowed anywhere and everywhere. State governments should be prepping now so that they can go live as soon as the ruling comes down in the spring.

:ohno:

This is going to ruin my trips to Las Vegas with my brother...
NFL betting in Vagas is a blast

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:05 pm
by CAA Flagship
Chizzang wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
The countdown is basically on. Sports gambling will be allowed anywhere and everywhere. State governments should be prepping now so that they can go live as soon as the ruling comes down in the spring.

:ohno:

This is going to ruin my trips to Las Vegas with my brother...
NFL betting in Vagas is a blast
Just think, your illegal immigrant barista can bring you a Cannabis Caffe Latte, with a dash of Pumpkin Spice, and a betting sheet when you arrive at your favorite coffee shop on Sunday mornings in Seattle. :thumb:

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:15 pm
by Chizzang
CAA Flagship wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

:ohno:

This is going to ruin my trips to Las Vegas with my brother...
NFL betting in Vagas is a blast
Just think, your illegal immigrant barista can bring you a Cannabis Caffe Latte, with a dash of Pumpkin Spice, and a betting sheet when you arrive at your favorite coffee shop on Sunday mornings in Seattle. :thumb:

8-)

That does sound nice...
But the maid is an illegal my Baristas are tattoo'd pink haired nose ringed millennials
(God bless their little hearts)

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:38 pm
by CID1990
Chizzang wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: Just think, your illegal immigrant barista can bring you a Cannabis Caffe Latte, with a dash of Pumpkin Spice, and a betting sheet when you arrive at your favorite coffee shop on Sunday mornings in Seattle. :thumb:

8-)

That does sound nice...
But the maid is an illegal my Baristas are tattoo'd pink haired nose ringed millennials
(God bless their little hearts)
Last I saw they were female polynesians who look like Tiger Woods with a weave


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:23 am
by Chizzang
CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

8-)

That does sound nice...
But the maid is an illegal my Baristas are tattoo'd pink haired nose ringed millennials
(God bless their little hearts)
Last I saw they were female polynesians who look like Tiger Woods with a weave
Occasionally that happens...
it's really an eclectic mix of Millennials (sure) you'll get the odd caramel colored hipster
As long as they're all equally attentive to my immediate needs - then I'm fine

:coffee:

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:13 am
by houndawg
CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:I've got no problem with it...

:nod:

But,
It's a snowflake Ban if Saudi Arabia isn't on it...
I would have agreed with you a year ago - and after the new king either a) cleans out the wahabbis or b) gets his head chopped off - I may agree with you again

but one major difference between SA and the countries on the list is that post-9/11 they have a pretty good intel infrastructure and they cooperate with our people. So we are able to simply refuse visas to the "bad" Saudis - no ban needed

The next couple years are going to be very interesting in Saudi Arabia


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mostly because it keeps them out of the clutches of a citizenry that would like to turn them into salsa. House of Saud wouldn't last a year without us.

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:19 am
by Ibanez
Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Last I saw they were female polynesians who look like Tiger Woods with a weave
Occasionally that happens...
it's really an eclectic mix of Millennials (sure) you'll get the odd caramel colored hipster
As long as they're all equally attentive to my immediate needs - then I'm fine

:coffee:
Are there that many 30ish year old barista's? :shock:

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:32 am
by houndawg
Ibanez wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
Occasionally that happens...
it's really an eclectic mix of Millennials (sure) you'll get the odd caramel colored hipster
As long as they're all equally attentive to my immediate needs - then I'm fine

:coffee:
Are there that many 30ish year old barista's? :shock:
We're a service economy. :coffee:

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:44 am
by kalm
Ibanez wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
Occasionally that happens...
it's really an eclectic mix of Millennials (sure) you'll get the odd caramel colored hipster
As long as they're all equally attentive to my immediate needs - then I'm fine

:coffee:
Are there that many 30ish year old barista's? :shock:
There are a few. At $15/hour plus tips they're making over $30K/year. That's enough to afford rent and upgrade the long board.

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:58 am
by Ibanez
kalm wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Are there that many 30ish year old barista's? :shock:
There are a few. At $15/hour plus tips they're making over $30K/year. That's enough to afford rent and upgrade the long board.
I can't wait for this next generation ( who I think is about to enter college) to start getting shat upon by everyone. :thumb:

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:19 am
by GannonFan
Ibanez wrote:
kalm wrote:
There are a few. At $15/hour plus tips they're making over $30K/year. That's enough to afford rent and upgrade the long board.
I can't wait for this next generation ( who I think is about to enter college) to start getting shat upon by everyone. :thumb:
Nonsense. We'll skip over that generation and wait until the generation that are the offspring of the Millinneals (assuming Millenneals take on parenthood - depends on how big the parent's basement really is) - now there's a generation that has the deck stacked against them. :rofl:

Re: SCOTUS: Ban On

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:27 am
by Ibanez
GannonFan wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I can't wait for this next generation ( who I think is about to enter college) to start getting shat upon by everyone. :thumb:
Nonsense. We'll skip over that generation and wait until the generation that are the offspring of the Millinneals (assuming Millenneals take on parenthood - depends on how big the parent's basement really is) - now there's a generation that has the deck stacked against them. :rofl:
:lol: I read an article stating (obviously) how Baby-Boomers are responsible for the millennials and that Gen X is responsible for Gen Z.

So...is that why? :mrgreen: