Page 1 of 1
Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:49 am
by 93henfan
We’ve had so much trouble finding oil that we were about to run out:
“For years and years, we thought we were running out of oil,” Verrastro said. “It took $120 for a barrel of oil to make people experiment with technology, and that has been unbelievably successful. We are the largest oil and gas producer in the world.”
The United States is so awash in oil that petroleum-rich Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil and natural gas company is reportedly interested in investing in the fertile Texas Permian Basin shale oil region, according to a report last month.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... 1a6141cd5a
This crisis is so dire, I would suggest opening up Yellowstone to drilling next. They could tap right into the Keystone Double XL.
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 1:00 pm
by SDHornet
Yup, stupid move to open up ANWR. Plenty of other places to drill or find alternative energy from.
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 1:22 pm
by Grizalltheway
I don't think the Keystone XL is built to carry magma.

Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 1:30 pm
by 93henfan
Grizalltheway wrote:I don't think the Keystone XL is built to carry magma.

That’s why we need the Keystone XXL!
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:21 pm
by Grizalltheway
93henfan wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:I don't think the Keystone XL is built to carry magma.

That’s why we need the Keystone XXL!
This thing is gonna be yuge. The biggest, most beautiful pipeline ever. #MAGmA
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:37 am
by Ibanez
Grizalltheway wrote:I don't think the Keystone XL is built to carry magma.

Well not if it's liquid hot magma...

Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:58 am
by Gil Dobie
Should be enough gas and oil to get me thru my Senior years.
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:23 am
by 93henfan
Gil Dobie wrote:Should be enough gas and oil to get me thru my Senior years.
We shale overcome.
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:44 am
by CAA Flagship
93henfan wrote:Gil Dobie wrote:Should be enough gas and oil to get me thru my Senior years.
We shale overcome.
Frackin eh.

Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:52 am
by 89Hen
93henfan wrote:Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil and natural gas company is reportedly interested in investing in the fertile Texas Permian Basin shale oil region
Keep your Saudi paws off my oil you damn dirty sand people.

Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:09 am
by andy7171
89Hen wrote:93henfan wrote:Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil and natural gas company is reportedly interested in investing in the fertile Texas Permian Basin shale oil region
Keep your Saudi paws off my oil you damn dirty sand people.

MOJO POWER!!!!
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:10 am
by andy7171
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 1:33 pm
by houndawg
CAA Flagship wrote:93henfan wrote:
We shale overcome.
Frackin eh.

Boring.

Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:08 am
by Ivytalk
Work on Sunoco’s Marine East shale pipeline was just halted by the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection. What’s a few spills and contaminated wells among friends?

Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:29 am
by GannonFan
Ivytalk wrote:Work on Sunoco’s Marine East shale pipeline was just halted by the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection. What’s a few spills and contaminated wells among friends?

Textbook example of why the EPA (and in this case the state version in the DEP) are always necessary to at least exist (a separate discussion from the idea of the EPA ever-expanding their mandate and pushing regulations further and further just because). Sunoco was trying to gloss over the difficulties of horizontal drilling in limestone formations common to the area. They needed to be held to task to do the drilling the right way and since they weren't holding themselves to that standard then the DEP gladly stepped in and is holding them to that standard for them. Not all companies are bad actors, but Sunoco, in at least this case, was.
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:13 am
by houndawg
SDHornet wrote:Yup, stupid move to open up ANWR. Plenty of other places to drill or find alternative energy from.
Got a huge fusion reactor just 93,000,000 miles away that produces enough in an hour to run the planet for a year and Chinese solar panels get cheaper every day.

Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 11:57 am
by SDHornet
houndawg wrote:SDHornet wrote:Yup, stupid move to open up ANWR. Plenty of other places to drill or find alternative energy from.
Got a huge fusion reactor just 93,000,000 miles away that produces enough in an hour to run the planet for a year and Chinese solar panels get cheaper every day.

That's all good and dandy until it's cloudy. While I'm all for alternative energy, we'll never get completely off fossil fuels unless we go 100% nuclear.
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 4:06 pm
by houndawg
SDHornet wrote:houndawg wrote:
Got a huge fusion reactor just 93,000,000 miles away that produces enough in an hour to run the planet for a year and Chinese solar panels get cheaper every day.

That's all good and dandy until it's cloudy. While I'm all for alternative energy, we'll never get completely off fossil fuels unless we go 100% nuclear.
collect it above the clouds
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:39 pm
by JohnStOnge
I think it's probably going to end up being a bad move politically. But my understanding is that the people of Alaska want it.
Re: Good Thing They Opened ANWR To Drilling
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:43 pm
by 93henfan
JohnStOnge wrote:I think it's probably going to end up being a bad move politically. But my understanding is that the people of Alaska want it.
Of course they do. They get a check from oil.
