Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28446/br ... stigiacomo


BREAKING: School Shooting At Maryland High School; Shooter Reportedly Engaged By Armed Resource Officer

According to local reporter Peggy Fox, Sheriff Time Cameron has confirmed that a shooting occurred this morning in a hallway by a Great Mills student, who was eventually engaged by an armed resource officer.

Two students injured, shooter killed. This isn't going to sit well with the people saying tighter school security is not the answer.

But this is probably a fake shooter anyway.

89Hen wrote:Two students injured, shooter killed. This isn't going to sit well with the people saying tighter school security is not the answer.

It's not rocket science.

Early reports are the kid had a handgun - not going to sit well with the folks that think banning the AR-15 is the answer.

Shooting occurred just before classes begun - not going to sit well with students looking forward to today's lunch.

GannonFan wrote:Early reports are the kid had a handgun - not going to sit well with the folks that think banning the AR-15 is the answer.

Did you mean to say "...not the answer."?

CAA Flagship wrote:Shooting occurred just before classes begun - not going to sit well with students looking forward to today's lunch.

Depends on the menu.

BlueHen86 wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote:Shooting occurred just before classes begun - not going to sit well with students looking forward to today's lunch.

Depends on the menu.

Website says tacos.

89Hen wrote:Two students injured, shooter killed. This isn't going to sit well with the people saying tighter school security is not the answer.

No one has said tighter security isn't AN answer. The issue has to be attacked from multiple angles.

GannonFan wrote:Early reports are the kid had a handgun - not going to sit well with the folks that think banning the AR-15 is the answer.

Actually it helps. If the kid had an AR-15, there would have been deaths, and likely the School resource officers would not have been able to neutralize him.

So just the opposite - a great case for banning AR-15's

dbackjon wrote:

89Hen wrote:Two students injured, shooter killed. This isn't going to sit well with the people saying tighter school security is not the answer.

No one has said tighter security isn't AN answer. The issue has to be attacked from multiple angles.

You mean like more armed teachers so that potential shooters can be attacked from multiple angles?

dbackjon wrote:

GannonFan wrote:Early reports are the kid had a handgun - not going to sit well with the folks that think banning the AR-15 is the answer.

Actually it helps. If the kid had an AR-15, there would have been deaths, and likely the School resource officers would not have been able to neutralize him.

So just the opposite - a great case for banning AR-15's

We don't know that for sure.

Gil Dobie wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

Actually it helps. If the kid had an AR-15, there would have been deaths, and likely the School resource officers would not have been able to neutralize him.

So just the opposite - a great case for banning AR-15's

We don't know that for sure.

Don't know what for sure?

dbackjon wrote:

89Hen wrote:Two students injured, shooter killed. This isn't going to sit well with the people saying tighter school security is not the answer.

No one has said tighter security isn't AN answer. The issue has to be attacked from multiple angles.

There have been plenty of people saying armed personnel is schools is not part of any answer, let's be honest a little here.

dbackjon wrote:

GannonFan wrote:Early reports are the kid had a handgun - not going to sit well with the folks that think banning the AR-15 is the answer.

Actually it helps. If the kid had an AR-15, there would have been deaths, and likely the School resource officers would not have been able to neutralize him.

So just the opposite - a great case for banning AR-15's

Why?

Grizalltheway wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:
We don't know that for sure.

Don't know what for sure?

If the kid had an AR-15, there would have been deaths, and likely the School resource officers would not have been able to neutralize him.

dbackjon wrote:

GannonFan wrote:Early reports are the kid had a handgun - not going to sit well with the folks that think banning the AR-15 is the answer.

Actually it helps. If the kid had an AR-15, there would have been deaths, and likely the School resource officers would not have been able to neutralize him.

So just the opposite - a great case for banning AR-15's

Very possibly but that's pure speculation.

GannonFan wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

No one has said tighter security isn't AN answer. The issue has to be attacked from multiple angles.

There have been plenty of people saying armed personnel is schools is not part of any answer, let's be honest a little here.

This

Gil Dobie wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote: Don't know what for sure?

If the kid had an AR-15, there would have been deaths, and likely the School resource officers would not have been able to neutralize him.

So we don't know that an AR can fire more rounds in a shorter amount of time than a handgun?

Grizalltheway wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:

So we don't know that an AR can fire more rounds in a shorter amount of time than a handgun?

If the kid had an AR-15, there would have been deaths, and likely the School resource officers would not have been able to neutralize him.

I have a semi-automatic, I know how fast they can shoot. But we don't know if there would have been deaths and that the officers would not have been able to neutralize the shooter. Possibly, but not for certain.

We don't know what kind of hand gun the shooter had either.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:

So we don't know that an AR can fire more rounds in a shorter amount of time than a handgun?

Really? LOL

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Weetag would make a horrible jury member.

CAA Flagship wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
Depends on the menu.

Website says tacos.

Well it is Tuesday.

Grizalltheway wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:

So we don't know that an AR can fire more rounds in a shorter amount of time than a handgun?

Are we talking with or with out a magazine?