Trump announces Brett Kavanaugh as his 2nd SCOTUS nominee.

[89Hen]

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop

I was guessing there was a term to describe it. Thanks, Skelly.

IYFF, 89 and Ganny!

Except it doesn't apply. I laid out one example per bullet point. Sorry you guys are too lazy or too stupid.

[kalm]

I was guessing there was a term to describe it. Thanks, Skelly.

IYFF, 89 and Ganny!

Except it doesn't apply. I laid out one example per bullet point. Sorry you guys are too lazy or too stupid.

No you gave headlines and posted 2 hours of videos to wade through. The fact you won’t point even one specific time in any video says it all.

phpBB [video]

[UNI88]

I was guessing there was a term to describe it. Thanks, Skelly.

IYFF, 89 and Ganny!

Except it doesn't apply. I laid out one example per bullet point. Sorry you guys are too lazy or too stupid.

Kalm, is this really a hill you want to die on? I didn't watch 89's videos but I've read enough mainstream media reports to believe that most of those bullet points have been supported by at least one of the Donk candidates.

[AZGrizFan]

Go back and read my claim dipshit. I said MOST. I posted evidence of MOST. You lazy commie bastard.

Half of his shit was opinion. Bernie wants to raise taxes = Bernie wants full blown socialism. Half of the rest was unsubstantiated garbage.

Face it, the SDS (socialism derangement syndrome) struggle is real! Seek help and prepare for your new overlords!

I posted direct quotes/articles/links. You really ARE that fucking lazy, aren't you?

[89Hen]

Except it doesn't apply. I laid out one example per bullet point. Sorry you guys are too lazy or too stupid.

No you gave headlines and posted 2 hours of videos to wade through. The fact you won’t point even one specific time in any video says it all.

Only three of the clips were over 2:30, a couple were under a minute. Lazy is the winner... but you're encroaching on stupid.

[GannonFan]

I was guessing there was a term to describe it. Thanks, Skelly.

IYFF, 89 and Ganny!

Except it doesn't apply. I laid out one example per bullet point. Sorry you guys are too lazy or too stupid.

Skelly has never really recovered his form after his self-banishment related to the epic fail of his Red Scare thread. He might never recover, that's the sad part.

[89Hen]

Except it doesn't apply. I laid out one example per bullet point. Sorry you guys are too lazy or too stupid.

Skelly has never really recovered his form after his self-banishment related to the epic fail of his Red Scare thread. He might never recover, that's the sad part.

It's only fitting that he show up on another thread of liberal fiction.

[AZGrizFan]

No you gave headlines and posted 2 hours of videos to wade through. The fact you won’t point even one specific time in any video says it all.

Only three of the clips were over 2:30, a couple were under a minute. Lazy is the winner... but you're encroaching on stupid.

I'm thinking he's taken a hard step left into "willfully ignorant".

[kalm]

No you gave headlines and posted 2 hours of videos to wade through. The fact you won’t point even one specific time in any video says it all.

Only three of the clips were over 2:30, a couple were under a minute. Lazy is the winner... but you're encroaching on stupid.

Here you go. Have at it. Still waiting...

Re: 2020 Republican Primary Thread
Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:25 am
89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
You keep posting these lists like they're accurate, meaningful, and that 1/10th of the items have a snowballs chance of getting implemented. (pst...it's a primary where the candidates pander to the base...think Obama bringing troops home from Afghanistan, installing single payer, and taking it to those bastards on Wall Street )

Stances are stances. Most of what Z posted came directly from their mouths. Whether they have a chance of passing or not, they've said it and I'm taking them at face value that they would pass them if they could.


Really? Well then start posting direct quotes. You can begin with:

Candidates who have stated they support open borders.

Who want to bankrupt the country.

Free everything fire all illegals.

Embraced Antifa

.

[CID1990]

Jelly pointing out fallacious logic reminds me of this quote from Dr. Seuss-

“Today you are you, that is truer than true. There is no one alive who is youer than you.”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skjellyfetti]

As long as you agree that it's fallacious.


Also, was your Skjellyfetti post alert slow today?

[CID1990]

As long as you agree that it's fallacious.


Also, was your Skjellyfetti post alert slow today?

Now he accuses me of following him around

No, Reek, haven’t followed the latest girl fight so I don’t know if you’re accurate or not

You pointing out fallacious logic alone is response worthy just for the epic lack of self awareness

Next JSO will accuse someone of being wordy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JohnStOnge]

We all know that it's likely that Kavanaugh really did do all this stuff. He probably really did assault Whitman in the manner she described and he probably did do things like expose himself to chicks, go on drunken binges, etc.

The only real question is whether someone who acted like a LOT of people acted in High School and College back then should be held accountable for that now.

[Skjellyfetti]

As long as you agree that it's fallacious.


Also, was your Skjellyfetti post alert slow today?

Now he accuses me of following him around

No, Reek, haven’t followed the latest girl fight so I don’t know if you’re accurate or not

You pointing out fallacious logic alone is response worthy just for the epic lack of self awareness

Next JSO will accuse someone of being wordy

So, you scan the thread and admit you don't pay attention to any of the posts until you get to mine.

But, you're not following me around?

[CID1990]

Now he accuses me of following him around

No, Reek, haven’t followed the latest girl fight so I don’t know if you’re accurate or not

You pointing out fallacious logic alone is response worthy just for the epic lack of self awareness

Next JSO will accuse someone of being wordy

So, you scan the thread and admit you don't pay attention to any of the posts until you get to mine.

But, you're not following me around?

No.

If you’ll scan back up you’ll see I posted something about CBS pointing out the real issue in the NYT story (to try to get the thread back on track) and I was seeing if it had distracted anyone from the girl fight

Alas, no

But you pointing out fallacious logic instead is like a big red flapping flag... next to impossible to miss

you may return to your embroidery


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Baldy]

We all know that it's likely that Kavanaugh really did do all this stuff. He probably really did assault Whitman in the manner she described and he probably did do things like expose himself to chicks, go on drunken binges, etc.

The only real question is whether someone who acted like a LOT of people acted in High School and College back then should be held accountable for that now.

The only thing "we all know" is that not one single person has corroborated any accusation made against Kavanaugh. Hell, Blasey-Ford's attorney even admitted that it was a politically motivated attack.

[CID1990]

We all know that it's likely that Kavanaugh really did do all this stuff. He probably really did assault Whitman in the manner she described and he probably did do things like expose himself to chicks, go on drunken binges, etc.

The only real question is whether someone who acted like a LOT of people acted in High School and College back then should be held accountable for that now.

The only thing "we all know" is that not one single person has corroborated any accusation made against Kavanaugh. Hell, Blasey-Ford's attorney even admitted that it was a politically motivated attack.

Let’s not forget that her friend who she listed as a witness to the assault said she doesn’t think Ford is credible, and this same friend was threatened to try to get her to corroborate the story.

Not a single witness, and the supposedly credible ones say they either don’t remember, or that the party in question didn’t happen.

But yeah, maybe Kavanaugh did it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ivytalk]

The only thing "we all know" is that not one single person has corroborated any accusation made against Kavanaugh. Hell, Blasey-Ford's attorney even admitted that it was a politically motivated attack.

Let’s not forget that her friend who she listed as a witness to the assault said she doesn’t think Ford is credible, and this same friend was threatened to try to get her to corroborate the story.

Not a single witness, and the supposedly credible ones say they either don’t remember, or that the party in question didn’t happen.

But yeah, maybe Kavanaugh did it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Meantime, I’ll call my broker and instruct him to short NYT shares.

Mornin’, CID!

[bluehenbillk]

We all know that it's likely that Kavanaugh really did do all this stuff. He probably really did assault Whitman in the manner she described and he probably did do things like expose himself to chicks, go on drunken binges, etc.

The only real question is whether someone who acted like a LOT of people acted in High School and College back then should be held accountable for that now.

So you can say this but then Ford's own lawyer comes out saying that she came forward with an agenda to put an asterisk next to his name. None of Ford's friends corroborate her story & she can't remember details - no court in the country would find her credible. But yet you say "it's likely that Kavanuagh really did do all this stuff". You need to turn off CNN & MSNBC and enter the real world....

[89Hen]

Only three of the clips were over 2:30, a couple were under a minute. Lazy is the winner... but you're encroaching on stupid.

Here you go. Have at it. Still waiting...

Re: 2020 Republican Primary Thread
Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:25 am
89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
You keep posting these lists like they're accurate, meaningful, and that 1/10th of the items have a snowballs chance of getting implemented. (pst...it's a primary where the candidates pander to the base...think Obama bringing troops home from Afghanistan, installing single payer, and taking it to those bastards on Wall Street )

Stances are stances. Most of what Z posted came directly from their mouths. Whether they have a chance of passing or not, they've said it and I'm taking them at face value that they would pass them if they could.


Really? Well then start posting direct quotes. You can begin with:

Candidates who have stated they support open borders.

Who want to bankrupt the country.

Free everything fire all illegals.

Embraced Antifa

.

You can't even use the quote function, so lazy is now behind stupid. You can wait all you want for the red herrings to show up. I gave you "most" which is exactly what I said were true.

[89Hen]

We all know that it's likely that Kavanaugh really did do all this stuff.

No John, we don't. I actually used to enjoy your posts but you've completely lost it.

[∞∞∞]

Kavanaugh and Thomas sexually assaulted women and that's their legacy. No matter what they do, that's how they'll be remembered for the rest of time.

Hopefully one day, at least Kavanaugh can be impeached so he can face real consequence.

[GannonFan]

Kavanaugh and Thomas sexually assaulted women and that's their legacy. No matter what they do, that's how they'll be remembered for the rest of time.

Hopefully one day, at least Kavanaugh can be impeached so he can face real consequence.

Listened to the NPR interview they did with the two women who authored the most recent book that the NYT ran with when they screwed up their story over the weekend. Good interview, and based on that and the book, it paints a fairly clear picture that we'll never know the true story of what Kavanaugh may have done and who, if anyone, assaulted Christine Blasely. You should branch out more and read and listen, things are always a lot more nuanced that you give it credit for.

[89Hen]

Kavanaugh and Thomas sexually assaulted women

So did you.

[∞∞∞]

Kavanaugh and Thomas sexually assaulted women and that's their legacy. No matter what they do, that's how they'll be remembered for the rest of time.

Hopefully one day, at least Kavanaugh can be impeached so he can face real consequence.

Listened to the NPR interview they did with the two women who authored the most recent book that the NYT ran with when they screwed up their story over the weekend. Good interview, and based on that and the book, it paints a fairly clear picture that we'll never know the true story of what Kavanaugh may have done and who, if anyone, assaulted Christine Blasely. You should branch out more and read and listen, things are always a lot more nuanced that you give it credit for.

As I've aged, I've realized it's pretty damn easy not to be accused of stuff...because I don't do it. And when I do something that bothers someone, it's easy to own up to it. Or understand why it bothered them.

Blasey had no reason to do what she did besides being a good American and doing her civic duty. Her life has been turned upside down since (and she acknowledged the risk before the confirmation); Kavanaugh is serving in the highest court.

Kavanaugh is a failed-rapist. That's his legacy. Thomas is an actual rapist. That's his.