FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=49670
Martha McSally and Doug Ducey?dbackjon wrote:OK America - you can support Trump, or you support the Constitution and the United States. You can't do both.
Who are the REAL Patriots here?
I wonder what Whitaker's position on asset forfeiture is?CID1990 wrote:Sessions is a proponent of big, intrusive government and his take on asset forfeiture alone should have insured that he never held any position within the legislative or executive branches
Given that asset forfeiture without due process enjoys support on both sides, I'd say that there's a 90% chance that Whitaker is no differentSkjellyfetti wrote:I wonder what Whitaker's position on asset forfeiture is?CID1990 wrote:Sessions is a proponent of big, intrusive government and his take on asset forfeiture alone should have insured that he never held any position within the legislative or executive branches
Does anyone know his position on much of anything (other than Mueller probe)?
President Pelosi would be as much as train wreck as President Trump.dbackjon wrote:CAA Flagship wrote: Pence it is.
He's part of Trumpence.
President Pelosi coming up
Pelosi is actually competent. That's the difference.Ibanez wrote:President Pelosi would be as much as train wreck as President Trump.dbackjon wrote:
He's part of Trumpence.
President Pelosi coming up
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FYPJohnStOnge wrote:This is just another indication of how thoroughly corrupt Trump is. I still shake my head at people who voted for Trump because they thought Clinton is corrupt. It's like deciding to buy an elephant because you think a mastadon is too big.
No she’s not, John. She’s terrible. She’s a Democratic face on the corporatism, colonialism, and militarism that is American politics...just like Hillary, Boxer, Schumer, McConnell, Cruz, Booker, Romney, Etc.JohnStOnge wrote:Pelosi is actually competent. That's the difference.Ibanez wrote: President Pelosi would be as much as train wreck as President Trump.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
St. Wronge, I have 95% confidence that your metaphors suck.JohnStOnge wrote:This is just another indication of how thoroughly corrupt Trump is. I still shake my head at people who voted for Trump because they thought Clinton is corrupt. It's like deciding to buy an elephant because you think a cow is too big.
Damn near everyone except Klam.kalm wrote:No she’s not, John. She’s terrible. She’s a Democratic face on the corporatism, colonialism, and militarism that is American politics...just like Hillary, Boxer, Schumer, McConnell, Boobs, Booker, Romney, Etc.JohnStOnge wrote:
Pelosi is actually competent. That's the difference.
This will surely get Trump impeached.93henfan wrote:Oh my. Such turmoil!
How will we make it through such a startling and unexpected development?
Trump just needs to appoint someone that will be his wingman.Pwns wrote:I honestly might like him more than the AGs of any of the last 3 administrations, but that's a pretty low bar.GannonFan wrote:Maybe this is Trump's opening move to eventually legalize pot and he saw Sessions as a stick in the mud on that issue?
In all seriousness, though, who's really upset with this? Sessions was likely one of Trump's worst appointees. I never cared for Sessions as a Senator, let alone the top prosecutor in the land. Hopefully this works out as a way to correct that original mistake. Now, if Trump's doing this to cover-up something, well, for one, it's one of the worst ways to do that and two, it won't work. But that's more conspiracy theory right now. I'm just glad a poor AG is leaving.
Doesn't matter, though...Trump's not looking to get someone more competent or with a different stance on pot. He wants someone who will put heat on Mueller, and in that way you could end up with someone worse.
JohnStOnge wrote:Pelosi is actually competent. That's the difference.Ibanez wrote: President Pelosi would be as much as train wreck as President Trump.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s a shame Stephen Miller doesn’t have a law degree.SDHornet wrote:Trump just needs to appoint someone that will be his wingman.Pwns wrote:
I honestly might like him more than the AGs of any of the last 3 administrations, but that's a pretty low bar.
Doesn't matter, though...Trump's not looking to get someone more competent or with a different stance on pot. He wants someone who will put heat on Mueller, and in that way you could end up with someone worse.
That would be funny it it ended with swing musicChizzang wrote:
NEWS IN BRIEFChizzang wrote:
Competent has little bearing on being the best person or right person for the job. I'm competent..but I shouldn't be CEO or the business owner within my organization.JohnStOnge wrote:Pelosi is actually competent. That's the difference.Ibanez wrote: President Pelosi would be as much as train wreck as President Trump.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
+++JohnStOnge wrote:Pelosi is actually competent. That's the difference.Ibanez wrote: President Pelosi would be as much as train wreck as President Trump.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know, huh.....Ivytalk wrote:It’s a shame Stephen Miller doesn’t have a law degree.SDHornet wrote: Trump just needs to appoint someone that will be his wingman.
mainejeff wrote:+++JohnStOnge wrote:
Pelosi is actually competent. That's the difference.
A lot of men on here just hate women in power. It's so obvious.
That's an amazingly sexist statement.mainejeff wrote:+++JohnStOnge wrote:
Pelosi is actually competent. That's the difference.
A lot of men on here just hate women in power. It's so obvious.
An old hag might be what is needed to fight an old bag.Ibanez wrote:mainejeff wrote:
+++
A lot of men on here just hate women in power. It's so obvious.
You couldn't be more wrong. Women in power isn't the problem. It's the person. Pelosi is the wrong person to try and lead the Democratic Party. She may have the experience and skill set...but if you want the Democratic Party to move forward...you might want to try getting someone that's less extreme, old, hated by her own party, etc...
Pelosi is just not what's needed.
