Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Interesting view of Socialist media, rewriting and erasing history.

Pulitzer link

Where do you find this shit?

Skjellyfetti wrote:Where do you find this ****?

You didn't even have time to watch it, so stfu.

Gil Dobie wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Where do you find this ****?

You didn't even have time to watch it, so stfu.

Get him, Gil!

Gil Dobie wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Where do you find this ****?

You didn't even have time to watch it, so stfu.

I watched it Gil. Holy shit...I think that guy is literally recording from his mom’s basement.

The most clever re-write of recent history is Republicans and Fox News
Pretending they loved Trump all along

Yeah...
I've never seen a more vigorous re-polishing and structural re-write in my lifetime

Pulitzer basically thinks his view is always the correct view of history, very large ego, from the History Channel shows I've seen him on. He claims Facebook and Twitter have limited his accounts because he started talking about the Palestinians and the martyr payouts.

History Channel is more of a cancer than I realized

Chizzang wrote:The most clever re-write of recent history is Republicans and Fox News
Pretending they loved Trump all along

Yeah...
I've never seen a more vigorous re-polishing and structural re-write in my lifetime

Yeah. That surpassed the Cleveland fans loving Lebron after returning to the Cavs.

CAA Flagship wrote:

Chizzang wrote:The most clever re-write of recent history is Republicans and Fox News
Pretending they loved Trump all along

Yeah...
I've never seen a more vigorous re-polishing and structural re-write in my lifetime

Yeah. That surpassed the Cleveland fans loving Lebron after returning to the Cavs.

Well, at least Lebron kinda apologized (or at least made them feel all warm and fuzzy with his return letter). And some GOP folks just decided to work with what they got in Trump without the whole love-in. But yes, many others and Fox just changed course entirely and went all love-in. But hey, that's kinda like how a lot of Dems just said screw it to the #MeToo movement when they wholly embraced, and still do, Hillary and the Clinton Foundation as their standard bearer. In a duopoly, partisans have to be hypocrites to some extent because there are only two options.

I'm glad you all agree with me that this guy is wacko. He's been a strong critic of the Oak Island search ever since they cut ties with him. Now he's been limited on facebook and twitter. Guess it's okay to limit free speech by these types of people.

Gil Dobie wrote:I'm glad you all agree with me that this guy is wacko. He's been a strong critic of the Oak Island search ever since they cut ties with him. Now he's been limited on facebook and twitter. Guess it's okay to limit free speech by these types of people.

It's not a free speech issue as long as the platform is privately owned. Want unrestricted free speech on social media? Declare it a public utility.

kalm wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:I'm glad you all agree with me that this guy is wacko. He's been a strong critic of the Oak Island search ever since they cut ties with him. Now he's been limited on facebook and twitter. Guess it's okay to limit free speech by these types of people.

It's not a free speech issue as long as the platform is privately owned. Want unrestricted free speech on social media? Declare it a public utility.

So you agree!

Gil Dobie wrote:

kalm wrote:
It's not a free speech issue as long as the platform is privately owned. Want unrestricted free speech on social media? Declare it a public utility.

So you agree!

You never made an original point. What am I agreeing with?

kalm wrote:

Gil Dobie wrote:
So you agree!

You never made an original point. What am I agreeing with?

It's okay to limit guys like this on FB and Twitter.