


I am confident that if only, say, the bottom 15% of the intelligence distribution in this country could vote, the Republicans would be completely screwed. The Democrats would chronically control both houses of Congress by overwhelming majorities as well as the Presidency.JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:44 pmDo you know who votes for Donks? A solid majority of the most educated people in the population. Post graduate education people voted by 58% to 37% for Clinton over Trump in 2016 and by 65% to 34% for Democrats over Republicans in the 2018 House elections.
The "people who vote for Democrats are stupid" thing just doesn't work. The cognitive elite in this country vote Democrat. I'm using education as a proxy for IQ. But I am confident that if only, say, the top 15% of the intelligence distribution in this country could vote the Republicans would be completely screwed. The Democrats would chronically control both houses of Congress by overwhelming majorities as well as the Presidency.
Those AA endorsements are piling up!
Eric - if you have paid attention you’d know that I’ve said countless times that proof of such is impossible. It’s impossible to measure. I said they duped Americans. Russian trolls gave false news/info which was spread.CID1990 wrote:Mark -
Link to how Russian meddling in 2016 was successful in terms of swaying votes away from Trump to Clinton?
I’ve been keeping an eye out for research or credible articles on that very subject since 2016 and haven’t seen anything
All I have seen up until now is that nobody knows or can measure Russian success in that context - only that historically the opposite has been true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There are no credible sources during the Trump Era.CID1990 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 4:08 pm Mark -
Link to how Russian meddling in 2016 was successful in terms of swaying votes away from Trump to Clinton?
I’ve been keeping an eye out for research or credible articles on that very subject since 2016 and haven’t seen anything
All I have seen up until now is that nobody knows or can measure Russian success in that context - only that historically the opposite has been true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
*ErikIbanez wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:09 pmEric - if you have paid attention you’d know that I’ve said countless times that proof of such is impossible. It’s impossible to measure. I said they duped Americans. Russian trolls gave false news/info which was spread.CID1990 wrote:Mark -
Link to how Russian meddling in 2016 was successful in terms of swaying votes away from Trump to Clinton?
I’ve been keeping an eye out for research or credible articles on that very subject since 2016 and haven’t seen anything
All I have seen up until now is that nobody knows or can measure Russian success in that context - only that historically the opposite has been true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
we have an entire agency that changes proples governments for them.JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 5:22 pmAnd BTW it wasn't some random Russian trolls. Per the Mueller report it was Russian government entities including a Russian intelligence service. It was a sophisticated effort. Again: In spite of Trump's exaggerations 2016 was an extremely close election. The margins were very thin. VERY possible that even a small degree of suppression would make a difference.
Its true too...
CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:54 amIts true too...kalm wrote:
That’s fucking awesome!
look at the full court press they put on Bernie... they came at him from all directions, with carefully measured condemnations of his brand of socialism... making literal conservative arguments about how fiscal math just doesn’t support unicorns...along with coordinated media backup
The Dems have never been more on message than they were about Bernie
Then they turn to Trump and all of a sudden its ARMAGEDDON WE MUST THWART DISASTER WITH TRANSTESTICLES, NAZI HUNTERS AND LETS THROW THE BORDERS OPEN WIDE BECAUSE NAZIS ALSO SODOMY
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OOH THE HORROR! The hypocrisy from Fox is incredible. I don't recall them pearl clutching when Trump has said a naughty, dirty, filthy word. Or made fun of a handicapped person. Or POWs. Or mocked a dead man.Former Vice President Joe Biden got into a heated and profanity-laced argument with an autoworker Tuesday while touring a factory in Detroit, after the individual accused the Democratic presidential candidate of trying to take away his Second Amendment rights.
"You’re full of sh-- ... I support the Second Amendment," Biden shot back, stressing he's not going to take guns away.
The worker then told Biden, "You're working for me, man," and told Biden that he saw an online video supporting his claim that Biden is hostile to the Second Amendment.
So Trump is the measuring stick? I thought the left was supposed to be better than he.Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:03 am https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden- ... un-dispute
OOH THE HORROR! The hypocrisy from Fox is incredible. I don't recall them pearl clutching when Trump has said a naughty, dirty, filthy word. Or made fun of a handicapped person. Or POWs. Or mocked a dead man.Former Vice President Joe Biden got into a heated and profanity-laced argument with an autoworker Tuesday while touring a factory in Detroit, after the individual accused the Democratic presidential candidate of trying to take away his Second Amendment rights.
"You’re full of sh-- ... I support the Second Amendment," Biden shot back, stressing he's not going to take guns away.
The worker then told Biden, "You're working for me, man," and told Biden that he saw an online video supporting his claim that Biden is hostile to the Second Amendment.![]()
I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.89Hen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:43 amSo Trump is the measuring stick? I thought the left was supposed to be better than he.Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:03 am https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden- ... un-dispute
OOH THE HORROR! The hypocrisy from Fox is incredible. I don't recall them pearl clutching when Trump has said a naughty, dirty, filthy word. Or made fun of a handicapped person. Or POWs. Or mocked a dead man.![]()
Yeah, because Fox News is the only one reporting this.Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:03 am https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden- ... un-dispute
OOH THE HORROR! The hypocrisy from Fox is incredible. I don't recall them pearl clutching when Trump has said a naughty, dirty, filthy word. Or made fun of a handicapped person. Or POWs. Or mocked a dead man.Former Vice President Joe Biden got into a heated and profanity-laced argument with an autoworker Tuesday while touring a factory in Detroit, after the individual accused the Democratic presidential candidate of trying to take away his Second Amendment rights.
"You’re full of sh-- ... I support the Second Amendment," Biden shot back, stressing he's not going to take guns away.
The worker then told Biden, "You're working for me, man," and told Biden that he saw an online video supporting his claim that Biden is hostile to the Second Amendment.![]()