I think we need a semantic ruling here
Paging Jelly
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Political and Societal Coarseness
- CID1990
- Level5
- Posts: 25460
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Political and Societal Coarseness
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Political and Societal Corseness
Couldn’t disagree more. And even if it IS true, using the phrase “in Trump’s America....” leaves the very intentional implication that this is a Trump-caused phenomenon, despite his claims to the contrary later in the article. He showed his true colors juuuuust a little bit and lost all credibility. Seriously, had he left out that ONE phrase the article would have been just fine and he wouldn’t have lost half of the readers by being so obviously partisan.houndawg wrote:Its his America from the day he took office until the day he leaves office.AZGrizFan wrote:
You don't see it? He directly calls it "Trump's America". Doesn't get much plainer than that.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- mainejeff
- Level4
- Posts: 5385
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
- I am a fan of: Maine
- A.K.A.: mainejeff
Re: Political and Societal Corseness
Blah blah blah.....enjoy the last days of your guy running amok. He will soon be neutered.AZGrizFan wrote:Couldn’t disagree more. And even if it IS true, using the phrase “in Trump’s America....” leaves the very intentional implication that this is a Trump-caused phenomenon, despite his claims to the contrary later in the article. He showed his true colors juuuuust a little bit and lost all credibility. Seriously, had he left out that ONE phrase the article would have been just fine and he wouldn’t have lost half of the readers by being so obviously partisan.houndawg wrote:
Its his America from the day he took office until the day he leaves office.
Snip...snip.
Go Black Bears!
Re: Political and Societal Corseness
Oh christ! Spandos is back!!!AZGrizFan wrote:Yes, a shit show he blames squarely on Trump. People simply don't want to admit that it started waaaaay before Trump. "Trump's America" is merely a continuation of "Obama's America"...SunCoastBlueHen wrote:
If you remove the name Trump from the article, what do you disagree with? To me it sums up nicely the shit show we have on both sides of the aisle.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Political and Societal Corseness
Only if half the readers were looking for anything to jump on that would "discredit" his spot-on analysis.AZGrizFan wrote:Couldn’t disagree more. And even if it IS true, using the phrase “in Trump’s America....” leaves the very intentional implication that this is a Trump-caused phenomenon, despite his claims to the contrary later in the article. He showed his true colors juuuuust a little bit and lost all credibility. Seriously, had he left out that ONE phrase the article would have been just fine and he wouldn’t have lost half of the readers by being so obviously partisan.houndawg wrote:
Its his America from the day he took office until the day he leaves office.
- Chizzang
- Level5
- Posts: 19273
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Soon to be Eden Prairie...
Re: Political and Societal Corseness
Grizalltheway wrote:Only if half the readers were looking for anything to jump on that would "discredit" his spot-on analysis.AZGrizFan wrote:
Couldn’t disagree more. And even if it IS true, using the phrase “in Trump’s America....” leaves the very intentional implication that this is a Trump-caused phenomenon, despite his claims to the contrary later in the article. He showed his true colors juuuuust a little bit and lost all credibility. Seriously, had he left out that ONE phrase the article would have been just fine and he wouldn’t have lost half of the readers by being so obviously partisan.
I do not see the forest...
For I am surrounded by trees
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus