Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

JohnStOnge wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:You got zero and you know it. Mueller got zero he knows it but you guys just wont stop so mive on to the next lie your side makes up.

You got 6 more years to deal with it, so oace your lies and Trumped up ****....... Its a marathon not a sprint.


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

As time goes on the more I suspect that Mueller got a lot more than zero. But, regardless, if you think there is nothing to Trump's tax returns you should be at the front of the line saying it's fine to release his tax returns.

In fact, you should be pushing for complete sunlight. You should be pushing for a release of a completely unredacted Mueller report as well as the release of Trump's tax returns so everybody can see how Trump is a pure as the driven snow.

JohnStOnge wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I thought they had all the conflicts of interest they needed already -

How is the discovery of new ones in his taxes going to move the needle at all? I’m assuming they think there is some golden key that will allow the House to impeach him without political consequence

It really is a tossup between how stupid each side thinks its followers are


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Remember, Trump won that election by the skin of his teeth. He won Florida by 1.2 percentage points, Michigan by 0.2 percentage points, Pennsylvania by 0.7 percentage points, and Wisconsin by 0.8 percentage points. It wouldn't take much to flip things entirely. If there are things in those tax returns that reflect really negatively on him it could indeed make a difference.

There's a reason why he doesn't want to let people know what is in his tax returns. We don't know exactly what it is. But there is a reason. And it's not just because he wants his privacy.

JohnStOnge wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I thought they had all the conflicts of interest they needed already -

How is the discovery of new ones in his taxes going to move the needle at all? I’m assuming they think there is some golden key that will allow the House to impeach him without political consequence

It really is a tossup between how stupid each side thinks its followers are


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Remember, Trump won that election by the skin of his teeth. He won Florida by 1.2 percentage points, Michigan by 0.2 percentage points, Pennsylvania by 0.7 percentage points, and Wisconsin by 0.8 percentage points. It wouldn't take much to flip things entirely. If there are things in those tax returns that reflect really negatively on him it could indeed make a difference.

There's a reason why he doesn't want to let people know what is in his tax returns. We don't know exactly what it is. But there is a reason. And it's not just because he wants his privacy.

CID1990 wrote:I could care less whether he releases his taxes or not.

Spoiler: show

93henfan wrote:

CID1990 wrote:I could care less whether he releases his taxes or not.

So you care to some degree then. Is it a little or a lot? That's really a large spectrum of caring you left open there for us all to guess about.

Now, if you couldn't care less, that would clear it right up.

Spoiler: show

93henfan wrote:

CID1990 wrote:I could care less whether he releases his taxes or not.

So you care to some degree then. Is it a little or a lot? That's really a large spectrum of caring you left open there for us all to guess about.

Now, if you couldn't care less, that would clear it right up.

Spoiler: show

kalm wrote:

93henfan wrote:
So you care to some degree then. Is it a little or a lot? That's really a large spectrum of caring you left open there for us all to guess about.

Now, if you couldn't care less, that would clear it right up.

Spoiler: show

Irregardless...he doesn’t care.

93henfan wrote:

CID1990 wrote:I could care less whether he releases his taxes or not.

So you care to some degree then. Is it a little or a lot? That's really a large spectrum of caring you left open there for us all to guess about.

Now, if you couldn't care less, that would clear it right up.

Spoiler: show

BDKJMU wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:

BDKJMU wrote:

There's a reason why he doesn't want to let people know what is in his tax returns. We don't know exactly what it is. But there is a reason. And it's not just because he wants his privacy.

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:
There's a reason why he doesn't want to let people know what is in his tax returns. We don't know exactly what it is. But there is a reason. And it's not just because he wants his privacy.

Biggest pile of bullshit you have ever shoveled.

Privacy Trumps everything

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Privacy Trumps everything.

∞∞∞ wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Privacy Trumps everything.

The President is a servant, not a sovereign.

And the People are his superior while Congress is its vessel.

∞∞∞ wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Privacy Trumps everything.

The President is a servant, not a sovereign.

And the People are his superior while Congress is its vessel.

Myself and others want our representatives to do what's necessary to get his tax returns, as allowed under their subpoena powers. I'd like to make sure the President has no conflicts of interests.

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

∞∞∞ wrote: The President is a servant, not a sovereign.

And the People are his superior while Congress is its vessel.

Myself and others want our representatives to do what's necessary to get his tax returns, as allowed under their subpoena powers. I'd like to make sure the President has no conflicts of interests.

Its none of your business. EVERYONE has a right to privacy in the USA. What "you" want is irrelevant

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

mainejeff wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Its none of your business. EVERYONE has a right to privacy in the USA. What "you" want is irrelevant

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

And what YOU want is irrelevant too.

Ibanez wrote:There is a tax statute from the 20s that allow committees to look at anyone's tax returns. So it's not exactly illegal.


Ironically, it was in response to corruption during a Republican administration.

Ibanez wrote:There is a tax statute from the 20s that allow committees to look at anyone's tax returns. So it's not exactly illegal.


Ironically, it was in response to corruption during a Republican administration.

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

Ibanez wrote:There is a tax statute from the 20s that allow committees to look at anyone's tax returns. So it's not exactly illegal.


Ironically, it was in response to corruption during a Republican administration.

There are what 4 people that have the authority to look into anyones tax records.

The news media, congress and peoole like Trip and MJ are not on that list. They dont have any right to see private information on any citizens of the USA.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

GannonFan wrote:

Ibanez wrote:There is a tax statute from the 20s that allow committees to look at anyone's tax returns. So it's not exactly illegal.


Ironically, it was in response to corruption during a Republican administration.

Eh, they haven't even really brought out the executive privilege argument yet. I don't see this being something that gets resolved easily and certainly not anytime soon. Trump isn't a young man, so there's every possibility that we don't see the tax returns until at least he kicks the bucket, and even then probably not as well.