Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Gateway Pundit baby. Take with a grain of salt, but know they will be 4-5 days ahead of other online sites due to lack of fact checking! Lol

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/

Youtube

I take a look at CNN, ABC, FOX, and then the BBC. Follow it all up with the WSJ and then whatever folks post here.

I have some really smart friends on social media and I use that as a news aggregate. Same with this place.

First site I log onto?

Championsubdivision.com

Drudge

C-SPAN

GannonFan wrote:I take a look at CNN, ABC, FOX, and then the BBC. Follow it all up with the WSJ and then whatever folks post here.

Very Close to this.

CNN, Drudge, Reuters, Fox, BBC


Some WSJ, NYT or WaPo if I get the chance.

BDKJMU wrote:Drudge

Yeah, we know.

Drudge is a dang good news aggregator.

And it could be me, but lately i've noticed that he's shifting to the left of alt-right.


Just slightly. He will link unflattering and "anti-Trump" stories regularly.

kalm wrote:I have some really smart friends on social media and I use that as a news aggregate. Same with this place.

That's where I get my fringe news - I have friends on the extremes on both sides and they all post regularly. It's quite the eye opener to remember the extremists out there.

AZGrizFan wrote:First site I log onto?

Championsubdivision.com

You are shipless.

cs.com

AZGrizFan wrote:First site I log onto?

Xvideos

Be honest ...

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

WSJ. I get the “10-Point” e-mail every morning before 7.

Ivytalk wrote:WSJ. I get the “10-Point” e-mail every morning before 7.

I forgot about Morning Brew. It’s morning email.


I used to get the NYT briefing emails but units stopped reading them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

UNI88 wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:First site I log onto?

Xvideos

Be honest ...

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

They saidfor news.

HuffPo

I want to see what I can expect from Jon, Jelly and Trip today.

Usually RealClearPolitics.com. That's because I am interested in polling. As a news site, according to the site I like to use for checking such things (mediabiasfactcheck.com), it has a right-center biased and a mixed accuracy in reporting rating. But the reason it has a mixed accuracy rating is that its news is just links to other sources and articles and/or editorials from some of those sources have failed fact checks.

I like to check Reuters because it has a "least biased" bias rating and a "very high" accuracy rating. When there's some big news story going on I like to check Reuters to see what that source has to say about it.

And of course I Google to look at a variety of sources when I'm wondering about something in the news.

It varies for me, but right now the first thing I read is the Nikkei Asian Review

It is by far one of the best news outlets I have ever followed. They have some real investigative journalism and excellent analysis.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JohnStOnge wrote:I am interested in polling.

I figured you more for a pegging guy.

Local sites. More bang for the vote (and buck).

AshevilleApp wrote:Local sites. More bang for the vote (and buck).

Our local outlet, DelawareOnline, is just a virtual version of the NewsUrinal. Gannett-produced POS.

AshevilleApp wrote:Local sites. More bang for the vote (and buck).

My local news source is terrible for national stuff. It's only good for what's happening in the general area, and even then it's pretty thin. Just isn't a market for local news anymore, no one wants to spend anything for it.

Stormfront

93henfan wrote:Stormfront

post of the week material