The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

[kalm]

I’ll take “CID is a doctrinaire conk for $500, Skelly”.

Go easy, he seems a bit brittle these days

That’s true. I’m sorry CID and I still think the world of ya....

[UNI88]

I’ll take “CID is a doctrinaire conk for $500, Skelly”.

Go easy, he seems a bit brittle these days

Skelly is pretty sensitive. If he was more insecure he could cheer for the Bison (Gil and WB being exceptions).

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

just curious why it only matters if a democrat is transparently full of shit

are you saying democratic voters will stay home in nov 2020 instead of voting for someone who is transparently full of shit and republicans won't? that conks lap trump's transparent shit up? that donks should be held to a different standard?

why don't you expound

This ^ is a curious observation

[CID1990]

just curious why it only matters if a democrat is transparently full of shit

are you saying democratic voters will stay home in nov 2020 instead of voting for someone who is transparently full of shit and republicans won't? that conks lap trump's transparent shit up? that donks should be held to a different standard?

why don't you expound

I’ll take “CID is a doctrinaire conk for $500, Skelly”.

Do I have to put “Trump is full of shit” in my siggy line for you morons?

But but but Trump

Let me explain it once more since we’re apparently in kindergarten

Trump needs the same voters who carried him across the finish line in 2016 (not his base)

The base is going to show up for both the Dem candidate and for Trump - that is a given

Trump needs the swing voters - i.e.: the Rust Belters and the former Obama voters who reliably vote for their economic well being. These are midwestern and Appalachian voters and they don’t fall for gimmicky campaigns. I believe Yang and to a lesser degree Gabbard could carry these voters. The rest of the field cannot.

So stop being triggered every time I talk about the Dem field. I could be a raging cunt leftist and still think they are by and large transparently full of shit

but but but but but Trump. Jesus


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

just curious why it only matters if a democrat is transparently full of shit

are you saying democratic voters will stay home in nov 2020 instead of voting for someone who is transparently full of shit and republicans won't? that conks lap trump's transparent shit up? that donks should be held to a different standard?

why don't you expound

1. go back in the corner and put the gag ball back in your mouth

2. ok I responded


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

just curious why it only matters if a democrat is transparently full of shit

are you saying democratic voters will stay home in nov 2020 instead of voting for someone who is transparently full of shit and republicans won't? that conks lap trump's transparent shit up? that donks should be held to a different standard?

why don't you expound

This ^ is a curious observation

Curious.... you mean ignorant of the 2016 postmortem?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[houndawg]

I’ll take “CID is a doctrinaire conk for $500, Skelly”.

Do I have to put “Trump is full of shit” in my siggy line for you morons?

But but but Trump

Let me explain it once more since we’re apparently in kindergarten

Trump needs the same voters who carried him across the finish line in 2016 (not his base)

The base is going to show up for both the Dem candidate and for Trump - that is a given

Trump needs the swing voters - i.e.: the Rust Belters and the former Obama voters who reliably vote for their economic well being. These are midwestern and Appalachian voters and they don’t fall for gimmicky campaigns. I believe Yang and to a lesser degree Gabbard could carry these voters. The rest of the field cannot.

So stop being triggered every time I talk about the Dem field. I could be a raging cunt leftist and still think they are by and large transparently full of shit

but but but but but Trump. Jesus


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think that white women are in play for the donk nominee, and I don't mean that as an Epstein joke.

[kalm]

Do I have to put “Trump is full of shit” in my siggy line for you morons?

But but but Trump

Let me explain it once more since we’re apparently in kindergarten

Trump needs the same voters who carried him across the finish line in 2016 (not his base)

The base is going to show up for both the Dem candidate and for Trump - that is a given

Trump needs the swing voters - i.e.: the Rust Belters and the former Obama voters who reliably vote for their economic well being. These are midwestern and Appalachian voters and they don’t fall for gimmicky campaigns. I believe Yang and to a lesser degree Gabbard could carry these voters. The rest of the field cannot.

So stop being triggered every time I talk about the Dem field. I could be a raging cunt leftist and still think they are by and large transparently full of shit

but but but but but Trump. Jesus


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think that white women are in play for the donk nominee, and I don't mean that as an Epstein joke.

I’m just still trying to process what “gimmicky campaign” is.

[CAA Flagship]

I think that white women are in play for the donk nominee, and I don't mean that as an Epstein joke.

I’m just still trying to process what “gimmicky campaign” is.

Here's an example:

[SeattleGriz]

Yeah those Christians are so dang monolithic

Let me help you out since you’re apparently new to this HD...

You’re in the early stages of thinking “surely this time the Jews will stop voting for anti Israel Democrats”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Guy points out that the up to now rock solid evangelical base of Trump's has a couple of fissures developing and you go off on some tangent about Jews and get all uppity about it. Did that smart girl at work take you to school again and you have to go talk down to somebody else to make you feel better about yourself? Is that the source of your hate?

Babylon Bee gets it.

https://babylonbee.com/news/the-babylon ... -to-resign

[Skjellyfetti]

but but but but but Trump. Jesus

says the guy trying to limit discussion in the trump impeachment thread to the democratic candidates.

[CID1990]

but but but but but Trump. Jesus

says the guy trying to limit discussion in the trump impeachment thread to the democratic candidates.

You make zero sense while you are flailing around trying to score..... something

Face it, Reeeek. You were wrong across the board and then you went ghost for weeks

you are unredeemable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

This ^ is a curious observation

Curious.... you mean ignorant of the 2016 postmortem?

You seem on edge right now... is everything okay ?

[CID1990]

Curious.... you mean ignorant of the 2016 postmortem?

You seem on edge right now... is everything okay ?

Yeah

One ankle biter is fine but now they’re multiplying

[Skjellyfetti]

Harder and harder to defend Trump. Poor Cid.

[Chizzang]

Harder and harder to defend Trump. Poor Cid.

its busy work



makes the time go faster in a government job

[CID1990]

Harder and harder to defend Trump. Poor Cid.

Yeah because explaining why Dems are pissing away 2020 is defending Trump

Why are you so obsessed with me and my position on Trump?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

Harder and harder to defend Trump. Poor Cid.

its busy work



makes the time go faster in a government job

It’s easier than defending Russian collusion conspiracy theories for better than 2 years, that’s for sure.

I use simple common sense to point to why Trump is currently heading for reelection and somehow heads start popping off

That’s a big common nerve I’ve struck apparently


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

its busy work



makes the time go faster in a government job

It’s easier than defending Russian collusion conspiracy theories for better than 2 years, that’s for sure.

I use simple common sense to point to why Trump is currently heading for reelection and somehow heads start popping off

That’s a big common nerve I’ve struck apparently

He's impeached now so you can take two weeks off...
and pick up his campaign support managers position mid January

[CID1990]

It’s easier than defending Russian collusion conspiracy theories for better than 2 years, that’s for sure.

I use simple common sense to point to why Trump is currently heading for reelection and somehow heads start popping off

That’s a big common nerve I’ve struck apparently

He's impeached now so you can take two weeks off...
and pick up his campaign support managers position mid January

I’m on to you Clitz




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skjellyfetti]

still reaching for the stars.


very admirable

[Winterborn]

Skelly is pretty sensitive. If he was more insecure he could cheer for the Bison (Gil and WB being exceptions).

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

88,

Thank you, I am happy to be lumped in with the illustrious company that is Gil.

While I may not think the Bison are the greatest thing since sliced bread (I actually think they are the greatest thing since beer was invented but that is a different point), I just don't feel the need to be preachy about it. Like Thomas Jefferson said "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and the Bison are God's gift to humanity." If people can't accept Mr. Jefferson's words, no amount of preaching from me is going to get them to see the light.

[BDKJMU]

Put Joe and Hunter Biden on the stand, during the dem primaries to boot.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter ... y-of-child

[CID1990]

Put Joe and Hunter Biden on the stand, during the dem primaries to boot.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter ... y-of-child

They do that and they’re stupider than the Dems.

The water doesn’t need to be muddied any further at this point. They could damage Biden but they’d further erode the “solemnity” of the process. Let impeachment run on the House’s articles as they stand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

Not that this guy knows anything about our government or the legal system. Probably just another deep state liberal...

I have complete confidence in Mr. Wray, and I know that the F.B.I. is not a broken institution. It is a professional agency worthy of respect and support. The derision and aspersions are dangerous and unwarranted.

I’m profoundly disappointed in another longtime, respected friend, Rudy Giuliani, who had spent his life defending our people from those who would do us harm. His activities of late concerning Ukraine have, at a minimum, failed the smell test of propriety. I hope he, like all of us, will redirect to our North Star, the rule of law, something so precious it is greater than any man or administration.

This difficult moment demands the restoration of the proper place of the Department of Justice and the F.B.I. as bulwarks of law and order in America. This is not about politics. This is about the rule of law. Republicans and Democrats alike should defend it above all else.

In my nearly 96 years, I have seen our country rise above extraordinary challenges — the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, segregation, assassinations, the resignation of a president and 9/11, to name just a few.

I continue to believe in and pray for the ability of all Americans to overcome our differences and pursue the common good. Order protects liberty, and liberty protects order.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/16/opin ... B7F76EP92k

Apparently someone actually does give a fvck about NYT op-eds when they’re confirming his biases.

With a nod to his credentials, even!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk