Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Boyfriend dump you?

I really hope they do. It’ll almost GUARANTEE his reelection in 2020.

"IMPEESH FOTEY FYE!!!"

A photo of the whistleblower was just released.






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

AZGrizFan wrote:I really hope they do. It’ll almost GUARANTEE his reelection in 2020.

My money is on this blowing up in the donks face...again...

mainejeff2 wrote:By the way.....does a Ukranian "transcript" even exist???

Of course it does. Why would the Dems vote on this before seeing the transcript or read the whistleblowers report? Makes no sense.

mainejeff2 wrote:

andy7171 wrote: Of course it does. Why would the Dems vote on this before seeing the transcript or read the whistleblowers report? Makes no sense.

Because Trump has already admitted to what he did?

Talk to another countries leader?

mainejeff2 wrote:

andy7171 wrote: Talk to another countries leader?

Yes.....8 times....to get "dirt" on a political rival.....and then withhold military aid for an active war against.....yup.....man crush Vlad.

You guys are a bigger joke than Dems defending Hillary and Benghazi. But at least she never became President....and didn't actually ADMIT what role she played.

Keep circling the drain Conks!

Aside from news reports, we haven't seen any evidence of anything. Let's wait for the evidence to bear out before we sharpen our pitchforks. It'll go 1 of 2 ways

1) Trump did nothing wrong or;
2) Trump did something wrong.

Either way, let's wait for the facts. The Republic will stand long enough to read a report.

And any important matters facing the country for the next six months or so...gets pushed to the side. Washington DC, typical.

mainejeff2 wrote:

andy7171 wrote: Of course it does. Why would the Dems vote on this before seeing the transcript or read the whistleblowers report? Makes no sense.

Because Trump has already admitted to what he did?

Truth aside, your selective belief in Trump's statements is amusing.

bluehenbillk wrote:And any important matters facing the country for the next six months or so...gets pushed to the side. Washington DC, typical.

That’s not always a bad thing.

mainejeff2 wrote:

bluehenbillk wrote:And any important matters facing the country for the next six months or so...gets pushed to the side. Washington DC, typical.

What are those "important matters"? Stacking courts with conservatives? Giving more tax breaks to corporations? More Trump rallies?

Moderator Kitteh... there’s a bot in our forum


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mainejeff2 wrote:

Ivytalk wrote:Boyfriend dump you?

STFU old man.

Looks like you nailed it Ivy.

mainejeff2 wrote:

89Hen wrote: Looks like you nailed it Ivy.

Don't you have an abortion protest to attend?

Not until Saturday.

mainejeff2 wrote:

bluehenbillk wrote:And any important matters facing the country for the next six months or so...gets pushed to the side. Washington DC, typical.

What are those "important matters"? Stacking courts with conservatives? Giving more tax breaks to corporations? More Trump rallies?

Do Democrats put Republicans on the bench?






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mainejeff2 wrote:

89Hen wrote: Not until Saturday.

I'm eating 5 children on Saturday! Cheers!

Hahahaha. That made me snort. Thanks, Jeff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mainejeff2 wrote:

89Hen wrote: Not until Saturday.

I'm eating 5 children on Saturday! Cheers!

We know you don't like children.

The memo (not even transcript) looks particularly bad for Trump, and it's redacted. Remember when he said he'd release the unredacted transcript? I do 'cause my memory spans a bit further than 24 hours.

Of course the whistleblower's complaint itself hasn't been released yet as promised.

Will Pelosi put it to a vote?

CAA Flagship wrote:Will Pelosi put it to a vote?

Short answer: No


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

css75 wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote:Will Pelosi put it to a vote?

Short answer: No


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Then why is she saying that it is grounds for impeachment? I would think she would keep her mouth shut until she decides to put it to a vote? Saying Trump did something wrong and not acting on it doesn't make sense, does it? What's the angle there?

CAA Flagship wrote:

css75 wrote:
Short answer: No


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Then why is she saying that it is grounds for impeachment? I would think she would keep her mouth shut until she decides to put it to a vote? Saying Trump did something wrong and not acting on it doesn't make sense, does it? What's the angle there?

She's senile..?
(she is senile btw)

Chizzang wrote:

CAA Flagship wrote: Then why is she saying that it is grounds for impeachment? I would think she would keep her mouth shut until she decides to put it to a vote? Saying Trump did something wrong and not acting on it doesn't make sense, does it? What's the angle there?

She's senile..?
(she is senile btw)

And she’s also simultaneously one of the smartest

Odds are they'll impeach him knowing he won't be convicted in the Senate. What they need to do is say that up front. Say, "Look, we're doing what's right. We know the Republican Party is corrupt and so the Senate won't do the right thing. But that's not our problem. We're going to do the right thing."

They need to make spin it into a commentary on the corrupt nature of the Republican Party. "Look! Those guys are going to refuse to remove this guy who obviously needs to be removed because he's got an 'R" by his name."

That sort of thing.

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
She's senile..?
(she is senile btw)

And she’s also simultaneously one of the smartest

Well, she can count votes, so there’s that. Not sure she could discuss Heidegger with you.