The left is sick

[UNI88]

Threesome to me has to do with a way of having sex.

"Throuple" is an actual relationship.

Relationships are 1 to 1

This is 1+1+ a coerced subordinate.

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?

Sounds like polyamory.
‘Throuple’, which I’d never bad even heard of, sound like a term some dumbass millenials invented, to go along with all their new gender terms..

Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

[Ivytalk]

Threesome to me has to do with a way of having sex.

"Throuple" is an actual relationship.

Relationships are 1 to 1

This is 1+1+ a coerced subordinate.

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?

Sounds like polyamory.
‘Throuple’, which I’d never bad even heard of, sound like a term some dumbass millenials invented, to go along with all their new gender terms..

Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

Why do relationships have to be limited to human-to-human? What about human-to-horse? Or human-to-goat? — Asking for a Friend (in Lake Charles)

[UNI88]

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?

Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

Why do relationships have to be limited to human-to-human? What about human-to-horse? Or human-to-goat? — Asking for a Friend (in Lake Charles)

They don't. If we didn't have human-to-horse or human-to-goat relationships we wouldn't have centaurs and satyrs. Now your friend in Lake Charles might frown upon mixing colors but diversity is a good thing.

[css75]

Threesome to me has to do with a way of having sex.

"Throuple" is an actual relationship.

Relationships are 1 to 1

This is 1+1+ a coerced subordinate.

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?

Sounds like polyamory.
‘Throuple’, which I’d never bad even heard of, sound like a term some dumbass millenials invented, to go along with all their new gender terms..

Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

Forcing/coercing an underling is not a good thing ever. There is such a thing as proper behavior in a workplace, especially if the perp is a Congressional rep.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[UNI88]

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?

Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

Forcing/coercing an underling is not a good thing ever. There is such a thing as proper behavior in a workplace, especially if the perp is a Congressional rep.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

We agree that forcing/coercing an underling is not a good thing.

Why do relationships have to be 1 to 1?

[BDKJMU]

Threesome to me has to do with a way of having sex.

"Throuple" is an actual relationship.

Relationships are 1 to 1

This is 1+1+ a coerced subordinate.

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?

Sounds like polyamory.
‘Throuple’, which I’d never bad even heard of, sound like a term some dumbass millenials invented, to go along with all their new gender terms..

Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

You might want to go look up the definition of xenophobia

[UNI88]

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?

Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

You might want to go look up the definition of xenophobia

Xenophobia - fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners or of anything that is strange or foreign.

[AZGrizFan]

Forcing/coercing an underling is not a good thing ever. There is such a thing as proper behavior in a workplace, especially if the perp is a Congressional rep.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

We agree that forcing/coercing an underling is not a good thing.

Why do relationships have to be 1 to 1?

I have zero problems with 2,3,4 people wanting to have a communal “relationship”. In fact, I can think of a few ladies I’d like to add to my “community”, but always get the cold shoulder from the wife for some reason.

But what she did was egregious. Should never have it be a subordinate, Then with the drugs, the naked pics, etc., etc....just dumb.

[css75]

Couldn’t get your response to quote UNI.

Personally, I don’t care how much, how many, be they human, animal, or shampoo bottle (had a guy come in one night with that when I worked ER). I just don’t want to hear about it,read about it at all. Their actions are between themselves, people they are involved with and God.

If they are in a position of public trust, and if they are too stupid to not keep it private, they deserve to lose that position of public trust. That applies to both genders and both parties, coercing/forcing someone to play their games should be prosecuted.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

You might want to go look up the definition of xenophobia

Xenophobia - fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners or of anything that is strange or foreign.

So you’re saying a couple of bi sexual chicks in a 3 way relationship with a guy are strange or foreign. Ok.
Xenophobia in the media today is thrown about exclusively by the left in regards to foreigners/immigration
Since we were talking about about a couple of bi sexual chicks or lesbians, the correct term to use would have been homophobia. .

[UNI88]

Xenophobia - fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners or of anything that is strange or foreign.

So you’re saying a couple of bi sexual chicks in a 3 way relationship with a guy are strange or foreign. Ok.
Xenophobia in the media today is thrown about exclusively by the left in regards to foreigners/immigration
Since we were talking about about a couple of bi sexual chicks or lesbians, the correct term to use would have been homophobia. .

But you're still in the closet so the correct term for you is denial

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

So you’re saying a couple of bi sexual chicks in a 3 way relationship with a guy are strange or foreign. Ok.
Xenophobia in the media today is thrown about exclusively by the left in regards to foreigners/immigration
Since we were talking about about a couple of bi sexual chicks or lesbians, the correct term to use would have been homophobia. .

But you're still in the closet so the correct term for you is denial

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Wrong.

[JBB]

Here’s a little montage giving us all a look at how the daily common core programming for all useful idiots is carried out at least in part:

*****WARNING: MESSAGE NOT APPROVED FOR COMMON CORE PROGRAMMING*****

https://youtu.be/f1ab6uxg908

This is at least the second version of this video because the common core gatekeepers at youtube don’t like it when useful idiots are provided materials not deemed appropriate by the state.

It’s almost top of the hour! Time for useful idiots to get their daily common core message.

[JBB]

Common core useful idiots are created in the schools. Many survive this degrading of their mental capacities and aren’t hopelessly damaged by their indoctrination. Unfortunately most have not been taught phonics rather common core memorized reading. The result:

THEY CANT READ.

That’s one big reason news papers and magazines are going under even while complying and delivering the daily common core message to the dumbed down masses of useful idiots.

Never thought of that before but it is obvious now.

Reading is hard. Limit your message to 250 characters. That way it’s all emotion no content. Of course the math is too diffucult to go into here says the common core.

Ps. Joe Biden was just refused communion because he advocates the murder of children. Hey! That would fit on Twitter, the message center for all useful idiots.

[Ivytalk]

JBB, kindly pack your baggage and return to AGS. We’re tired of your schtick here.

[Ibanez]

It’s when 3 people are in a relationship.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why not just say 3 some?

Because that isn’t the same thing. I’ve already explained this. Look up


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Why not just say 3 some?

Because that would sound immoral, whereas throuple gives it the facade of legitimacy.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

God you’re an idiot. A threesome is just sex. Throuple is a relationship among 3 people.


How is this difficult to understand?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Threesome to me has to do with a way of having sex.

"Throuple" is an actual relationship.

Relationships are 1 to 1

This is 1+1+ a coerced subordinate.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Says who? Relationships can be 3 people.


And I haven’t read anything to say she was coerced. Sounds consensual.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?



Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

Forcing/coercing an underling is not a good thing ever. There is such a thing as proper behavior in a workplace, especially if the perp is a Congressional rep.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Agreed. But I haven’t read anything to say she was forced into it.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Why do relationships have to be limited to 1 to 1? Does that mean that a family of 3 or more have a series of 1 to 1 relationships and that there is no familial relationship?



Who cares that 2, 3 or more people want enter into a relationship and what they want to call it? Does it hurt or scare you somehow? Do you want to force them to adhere to your beliefs and values?

Xenophobia isn't a good thing.

Why do relationships have to be limited to human-to-human? What about human-to-horse? Or human-to-goat? — Asking for a Friend (in Lake Charles)

It’s the human to gator relationship that is tricky.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Couldn’t get your response to quote UNI.

Personally, I don’t care how much, how many, be they human, animal, or shampoo bottle (had a guy come in one night with that when I worked ER). I just don’t want to hear about it,read about it at all. Their actions are between themselves, people they are involved with and God.

If they are in a position of public trust, and if they are too stupid to not keep it private, they deserve to lose that position of public trust. That applies to both genders and both parties, coercing/forcing someone to play their games should be prosecuted.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

So you don’t want to see or read anything you find weird or don’t like?

Dude - get off the internet. Destroy your tv and phone. Stay inside. Cancel your newspaper.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Common core useful idiots are created in the schools. Many survive this degrading of their mental capacities and aren’t hopelessly damaged by their indoctrination. Unfortunately most have not been taught phonics rather common core memorized reading. The result:

THEY CANT READ.

That’s one big reason news papers and magazines are going under even while complying and delivering the daily common core message to the dumbed down masses of useful idiots.

Never thought of that before but it is obvious now.

Reading is hard. Limit your message to 250 characters. That way it’s all emotion no content. Of course the math is too diffucult to go into here says the common core.

Ps. Joe Biden was just refused communion because he advocates the murder of children. Hey! That would fit on Twitter, the message center for all useful idiots.

You are the one person we can rally against. Your crap is tiring. Do what Ivy suggested and go back to AGS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

Relationships are 1 to 1

This is 1+1+ a coerced subordinate.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Says who? Relationships can be 3 people.


And I haven’t read anything to say she was coerced. Sounds consensual.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This. You're playing with fire in the work environment but it's not illegal nor is it immoral.

[CAA Flagship]

Says who? Relationships can be 3 people.


And I haven’t read anything to say she was coerced. Sounds consensual.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This. You're playing with fire in the work environment but it's not illegal nor is it immoral.

Sure, it's not illegal. We can get pretty close to black and white on that because of written laws.

Not sure how to determine if immoral or not. Where's the immoral scale to see where it lands?

[kalm]

This. You're playing with fire in the work environment but it's not illegal nor is it immoral.

Sure, it's not illegal. We can get pretty close to black and white on that because of written laws.

Not sure how to determine if immoral or not. Where's the immoral scale to see where it lands?

Consent. Human sexuality is a spectrum. Like other apes many people have urges to get their freak on with multiple partners. Who is anyone to judge? Infidelity is far more amoral than this.