Page 1 of 1

Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:17 am
by kalm
Our measurements are lacking. $6 trillion in positive outputs...

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/ ... egafuzCdBA

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:52 am
by mainejeff
kalm wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:17 am Our measurements are lacking. $6 trillion in positive outputs...

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/ ... egafuzCdBA
We should be logging those places. No one visits parks or does anything outdoors anymore other than ski and golf. We could use the resources to pay off the National debt and keep Social Security solvent. :nod: :thumb:

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:59 am
by Ivytalk
Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:01 am
by mainejeff
Ivytalk wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:59 am Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.
More talky talk from the egghead. :roll:

Log 'em!

:coffee:

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:03 am
by CAA Flagship
This is true. 93henfan visited some National Parks last summer and single-handedly pumped about a half-million dollars into the economic circulation.

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:43 am
by Ivytalk
mainejeff wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:01 am
Ivytalk wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:59 am Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.
More talky talk from the egghead. :roll:

Log 'em!

:coffee:
Piss off, Faux Trumptard. You’re just waiting for the chance to help put Bootyitch into office. He’s your kind of people! :thumb:

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:45 am
by mainejeff
Ivytalk wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:43 am
mainejeff wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:01 am

More talky talk from the egghead. :roll:

Log 'em!

:coffee:
Piss off, Faux Trumptard. You’re just waiting for the chance to help put Bootyitch into office. He’s your kind of people! :thumb:
I don't care much for Buttplug. If Bloomberg isn't the nominee I will definitely vote for Trump! :nod: I don't know why you hate Trump....and America so much. :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:28 pm
by 93henfan
CAA Flagship wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:03 am This is true. 93henfan visited some National Parks last summer and single-handedly pumped about a half-million dollars into the economic circulation.
$541,917.43

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:12 pm
by CID1990
Ivytalk wrote:Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.
JSO and Jearf are proof that both 100% substance and 0% substance can be equally irritating


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:41 pm
by mainejeff
CID1990 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:12 pm
Ivytalk wrote:Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.
JSO and Jearf are proof that both 100% substance and 0% substance can be equally irritating


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And you prove time and time again that you are not a real MAGA....otherwise you would support President Trump 1000%! :thumb:

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:59 pm
by kalm
Since the thread title is economic value, I’ll put this here...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesellsm ... b1b7374473

I suppose one can make a strategic case for fossil fuel studies over the last 60 years but it seems harder and harder to justify...

Re: Economic Value

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:15 pm
by mainejeff
kalm wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:59 pm Since the thread title is economic value, I’ll put this here...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesellsm ... b1b7374473

I suppose one can make a strategic case for fossil fuel studies over the last 60 years but it seems harder and harder to justify...
We should subsidize oil over education! Oil is a national safety and security issue....and provides many jobs to our hard working MAGAs. Education is a libtard fantasy. :thumb: