Economic Value
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:17 am
Our measurements are lacking. $6 trillion in positive outputs...
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/ ... egafuzCdBA
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/ ... egafuzCdBA
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=51564
We should be logging those places. No one visits parks or does anything outdoors anymore other than ski and golf. We could use the resources to pay off the National debt and keep Social Security solvent.kalm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:17 am Our measurements are lacking. $6 trillion in positive outputs...
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/ ... egafuzCdBA
More talky talk from the egghead.Ivytalk wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:59 am Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.
Piss off, Faux Trumptard. You’re just waiting for the chance to help put Bootyitch into office. He’s your kind of people!mainejeff wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:01 amMore talky talk from the egghead.Ivytalk wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:59 am Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.![]()
Log 'em!
![]()
I don't care much for Buttplug. If Bloomberg isn't the nominee I will definitely vote for Trump!
$541,917.43CAA Flagship wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:03 am This is true. 93henfan visited some National Parks last summer and single-handedly pumped about a half-million dollars into the economic circulation.
JSO and Jearf are proof that both 100% substance and 0% substance can be equally irritatingIvytalk wrote:Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.
And you prove time and time again that you are not a real MAGA....otherwise you would support President Trump 1000%!CID1990 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:12 pmJSO and Jearf are proof that both 100% substance and 0% substance can be equally irritatingIvytalk wrote:Interesting quantitative approach to the value of national (and, by implication, state) parks. Although I agree with the principal points made, I suppose there are other ways to measure the result. And I fear there might be about 25 posts in this thread from JSO on the variables, methodology, and statistics.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We should subsidize oil over education! Oil is a national safety and security issue....and provides many jobs to our hard working MAGAs. Education is a libtard fantasy.kalm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:59 pm Since the thread title is economic value, I’ll put this here...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesellsm ... b1b7374473
I suppose one can make a strategic case for fossil fuel studies over the last 60 years but it seems harder and harder to justify...