That is a good question.UNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 12:17 pmInteresting and long article. I need to set aside some time to finish it.Winterborn wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 10:56 am
That is the one I am talking about (and assume Ivy is as well).
I do wonder if the CCP is really only the face of China and not really the cause of the problem. The real issue seems to be the Han belief that they are the rightful rulers of the world (celestial empire, mandate of heaven, etc.).
Would things be different if Chiang Kai-shek had won? Or would we still have arrived at this point?
Link to the article - China Unquarantined
While policymakers accurately assessed the upside for America from engaging China, they missed a whole dimension of downside in the righthand column of the ledger. They gave virtually no consideration to the unintended ramifications of promoting global “interdependence” with an increasingly powerful actor that does not share Western liberal values — that is, indeed, implacably hostile to them. An entire class of hazards inherent in our grand strategy for “managing China” were left, by America’s chief risk officers, priced effectively at zero — even as our “globalization” policies exposed our society, economy, and political system to huge new vulnerabilities at the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.
My guess is that the mandate would of been tempered in a way more towards democracy.