
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What’s the over/under on $$$ that will be dumped into Georgia for these two special elections???
$100M give or take $10MCol Hogan wrote:What’s the over/under on $$$ that will be dumped into Georgia for these two special elections???
It turns out as of yesterday:GannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2020 2:15 pmCNN's trying not to look biased. They realize the Trump Train is coming to an end so they're trying to get back some journalistic credentials by trying to look restrained. It's going to be hard to take CNN seriously after these last four years of abandoning all their principles.![]()
Edit- see below post. 500 million.
It was I think astounding to the whole country when FOX called Arizona on Tuesday. FiveThirtyEight was most skeptical at the time even calling it irresponsible for Fox to call it so soon. I would love to know the fallout of that over there.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 9:56 amIt turns out as of yesterday:GannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2020 2:15 pm
CNN's trying not to look biased. They realize the Trump Train is coming to an end so they're trying to get back some journalistic credentials by trying to look restrained. It's going to be hard to take CNN seriously after these last four years of abandoning all their principles.![]()
-FNC called AZ as soon after the polls closed. Biden was up by something like 8.5% at the time maybe half (or might have been less than half, don't remember) reporting. Trotted out some ass clown who tried to defend it, insisting it wasn't going to be close/conks had no chance.
-AP called Wed I think.
-ABC called it, but retracted it, so hasn't called it.
-NBC still hasn't called it.
-CBS still hasn't called it.
-CNN still hasn't called it.
Using NBC AZ now showing Biden up by .6%/20k votes out of 3.2+ million, 115k votes outstanding. Likely going to be a recount in AZ. While Biden will likely win by the skin of his dentures, CNN was right in this case not to call it, as were the others. It wasn't trying not to look biased. With FNC its WTF were they thinking?
We need a Kennedy Project to counter AOC and the pseudo-progressive wing of the Democratic Party.
The SC race had 180 million.
Well, Biden admitted it:SDHornet wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 11:12 pm More on the "software glitch".
Politico article on GA also having issues with this system.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/0 ... tch-434065The counties use voting machines made by Dominion Voting Systems and electronic poll books — used to sign in voters — made by KnowInk.
The companies “uploaded something last night, which is not normal, and it caused a glitch,” said Marcia Ridley, elections supervisor at Spalding County Board of Election. That glitch prevented pollworkers from using the pollbooks to program smart cards that the voters insert into the voting machines.
My numbers are conservative.BDKJMU wrote:The SC race had 180 million.
The AZ race had 145 million.
https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-o ... y=allcands
These 2 races for will for control of EVERYTHING, the difference between the democrats having a shot at court packing, implementing portions of the Green New Deal, eliminating the Trump tax cuts, gun bans, etc, etc, etc. The 2 GA races I think will be the 2 most exspensive Senate races in US history, by far. While my previous reply of 1 billion was too high, I'd 500 million.
It’s funny how the Trump supporters just forge right on ahead past the content warnings (and no, I’m not a fan of tech companies censorship).BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:25 amWell, Biden admitted it:SDHornet wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 11:12 pm More on the "software glitch".
Politico article on GA also having issues with this system.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/0 ... tch-434065
FYPIbanez wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:49 amMy numbers are conservative, unlike Trump.BDKJMU wrote: The SC race had 180 million.
The AZ race had 145 million.
https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-o ... y=allcands
These 2 races for will for control of EVERYTHING, the difference between the democrats having a shot at court packing, implementing portions of the Green New Deal, eliminating the Trump tax cuts, gun bans, etc, etc, etc. The 2 GA races I think will be the 2 most exspensive Senate races in US history, by far. While my previous reply of 1 billion was too high, I'd 500 million.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't think there will be any fallout. Fox has admitted moving more to the center earlier last year, and even defended themselves with that reasoning when Trump was on their show post election.DuckDuckGriz wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:00 amIt was I think astounding to the whole country when FOX called Arizona on Tuesday. FiveThirtyEight was most skeptical at the time even calling it irresponsible for Fox to call it so soon. I would love to know the fallout of that over there.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 9:56 am
It turns out as of yesterday:
-FNC called AZ as soon after the polls closed. Biden was up by something like 8.5% at the time maybe half (or might have been less than half, don't remember) reporting. Trotted out some ass clown who tried to defend it, insisting it wasn't going to be close/conks had no chance.
-AP called Wed I think.
-ABC called it, but retracted it, so hasn't called it.
-NBC still hasn't called it.
-CBS still hasn't called it.
-CNN still hasn't called it.
Using NBC AZ now showing Biden up by .6%/20k votes out of 3.2+ million, 115k votes outstanding. Likely going to be a recount in AZ. While Biden will likely win by the skin of his dentures, CNN was right in this case not to call it, as were the others. It wasn't trying not to look biased. With FNC its WTF were they thinking?
He wants the courts to set aside the Pa votes. What a choade.Skjellyfetti wrote:I think the next big break in the hunt for evidence of fraud will be Rudy miraculously finding generate_fake_ballots.py on Hunter's laptop
It was a dumb business move made by the Rupert Murdoch sons (who aren’t conservative like their daddy or Roger Ailes was (the real FNC died with him in 2017). Plenty of other place for conservatives to go for news.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:05 amI don't think there will be any fallout. Fox has admitted moving more to the center earlier last year, and even defended themselves with that reasoning when Trump was on their show post election.DuckDuckGriz wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:00 am
It was I think astounding to the whole country when FOX called Arizona on Tuesday. FiveThirtyEight was most skeptical at the time even calling it irresponsible for Fox to call it so soon. I would love to know the fallout of that over there.
Their reasoning was that they have pretty much all of the Conservative viewership and where else would they go for news. Savvy business move.
Now, look out for Newsmax TV and if/when Trump starts his own news show.
Fox is moving slightly left towards Center. That’s not a bad place to reside. Better than far right or far left.BDKJMU wrote:It was a dumb business move made by the Rupert Murdoch sons (who aren’t conservative like their daddy or Roger Ailes was (the real FNC died with him in 2017). Plenty of other place for conservatives to go for news.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:05 am I don't think there will be any fallout. Fox has admitted moving more to the center earlier last year, and even defended themselves with that reasoning when Trump was on their show post election.
Their reasoning was that they have pretty much all of the Conservative viewership and where else would they go for news. Savvy business move.
Now, look out for Newsmax TV and if/when Trump starts his own news show.
-OAN
-News Max
-Blaze TV
-Talk Radio
-Countless podcasts
It was also a dumb move putting a donk consultant in charge of their decision desk, proven by that premature AZ call. I guess that was some attempt to say ‘we’re not biased’.
Moving left they’ll lose more than they gain for the simple fact that there’s a lot more competition. Look at Drudge. Summer 2019 they completely flipped to anti Trump (clearly something happened between Trump and Drudge), and their traffic is reportedly down 45%. Heck, I use to go there multiple times a day, and that dwindled to the point where I might go in there once a week..Ironically, that’s when I started going to FNC online more.
I know a couple of people that have said they are done with FNC. I’ll still occasionally watch Tucker and go online, but that’s about it..
They’ll lose viewers if they continue.Ibanez wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:33 pmFox is moving slightly left towards Center. That’s not a bad place to reside. Better than far right or far left.BDKJMU wrote: It was a dumb business move made by the Rupert Murdoch sons (who aren’t conservative like their daddy or Roger Ailes was (the real FNC died with him in 2017). Plenty of other place for conservatives to go for news.
-OAN
-News Max
-Blaze TV
-Talk Radio
-Countless podcasts
It was also a dumb move putting a donk consultant in charge of their decision desk, proven by that premature AZ call. I guess that was some attempt to say ‘we’re not biased’.
Moving left they’ll lose more than they gain for the simple fact that there’s a lot more competition. Look at Drudge. Summer 2019 they completely flipped to anti Trump (clearly something happened between Trump and Drudge), and their traffic is reportedly down 45%. Heck, I use to go there multiple times a day, and that dwindled to the point where I might go in there once a week..Ironically, that’s when I started going to FNC online more.
I know a couple of people that have said they are done with FNC. I’ll still occasionally watch Tucker and go online, but that’s about it..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
From what I read not all precincts followed the segregation order.Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:20 am Lol. Alito just reiterates the status quo of the previous order. There was no evidence presented that PA has not been segregating those votes.
But, if that's what you're counting on - good luck.![]()
Wayne County, MI fraud:Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:06 am I think the next big break in the hunt for evidence of fraud will be Rudy miraculously finding generate_fake_ballots.py on Hunter's laptop
That's because you're a man like Mike Gundy ...BDKJMU wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:21 pmIt was a dumb business move made by the Rupert Murdoch sons (who aren’t conservative like their daddy or Roger Ailes was (the real FNC died with him in 2017). Plenty of other place for conservatives to go for news.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:05 am
I don't think there will be any fallout. Fox has admitted moving more to the center earlier last year, and even defended themselves with that reasoning when Trump was on their show post election.
Their reasoning was that they have pretty much all of the Conservative viewership and where else would they go for news. Savvy business move.
Now, look out for Newsmax TV and if/when Trump starts his own news show.
-OAN
-News Max
-Blaze TV
-Talk Radio
-Countless podcasts
It was also a dumb move putting a donk consultant in charge of their decision desk, proven by that premature AZ call. I guess that was some attempt to say ‘we’re not biased’.
Moving left they’ll lose more than they gain for the simple fact that there’s a lot more competition. Look at Drudge. Summer 2019 they completely flipped to anti Trump (clearly something happened between Trump and Drudge), and their traffic is reportedly down 45%. Heck, I use to go there multiple times a day, and that dwindled to the point where I might go in there once a week..Ironically, that’s when I started going to FNC online more.
I know a couple of people that have said they are done with FNC. I’ll still occasionally watch Tucker and go online, but that’s about it..
The Trump campaign can take the evidence to a court. I'm not about to wade through that to see if it's legit or not.SDHornet wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:45 pmWayne County, MI fraud:Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:06 am I think the next big break in the hunt for evidence of fraud will be Rudy miraculously finding generate_fake_ballots.py on Hunter's laptop
BTW, for some who was heavily into trends and posting graphs and such, I'm wondering if you have a mathematical explanation for the statistical anomalies observed from the data analysis of the voting results.
Nothing will come of it in the near future. Maybe in 30 years or something.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:42 pm Hammer and Scorecard.
We'll see if there is any truth behind this.
Agreed. Lots of statistical anomalies and it's just the initial analysis.Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:52 pmThe Trump campaign can take the evidence to a court. I'm not about to wade through that to see if it's legit or not.
Courts, not Twitter, is where it should be litigated