VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Political discussions
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 55297
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by Ibanez »

SDHornet wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:55 pm
Didn't watch any of it. Saw a CNN headline claiming it was a draw so I assume Pence won.

Oh and regarding the lack of an answer on packing the court, here you go:

Packing the court is just stupid. It kills me that politicians will lie, their opponents will run ads that lie and at the end nobody remembers the truth.

Case in point - last night I saw a series of Lindsey Graham and Jamie Harrison Ads. Lindsey runs ads that say Harrison supports defunding the police. Literally, the next ad is Jamie, with videos of himself saying he opposes defunding the police. Then another ad pointing out Lindsey on record lying and back tracking. It's mudslinging at this point.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6720
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by Pwns »

That's exactly why I can't get too worked up about Trump's promise to not be a sore loser if he loses.

If you're going to expand the court because you don't like who is on it, why even have a Supreme Court?
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.

User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 54180
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by AZGrizFan »

Pwns wrote:
Fri Oct 09, 2020 9:19 am
That's exactly why I can't get too worked up about Trump's promise to not be a sore loser if he loses.

If you're going to expand the court because you don't like who is on it, why even have a Supreme Court?
Dems epitomize sore losers.

Didn’t win the election? Solution: abolish the electoral college and spend 4 years attempting to impeach the president
Can’t get a SCJ nomination through? solution: pack the court as soon as they have control again
Criminals killed by cops? Solution: burn down and loot every major city in America
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image

User avatar
catbooster
Level2
Level2
Posts: 561
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:37 am
I am a fan of: Montana State

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by catbooster »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:33 am
Pwns wrote:
Fri Oct 09, 2020 9:19 am
That's exactly why I can't get too worked up about Trump's promise to not be a sore loser if he loses.

If you're going to expand the court because you don't like who is on it, why even have a Supreme Court?
Dems epitomize sore losers.

Didn’t win the election? Solution: abolish the electoral college and spend 4 years attempting to impeach the president
Can’t get a SCJ nomination through? solution: pack the court as soon as they have control again
Criminals killed by cops? Solution: burn down and loot every major city in America
See? You said it yourself - The Dem's are the party of solutions.

:dunce: :rofl:

houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 17791
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by houndawg »

JoltinJoe wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 2:41 am
IMO, the moderator's questioning was transparently biased. The issues she chose; even the phrasing of the questions, i.e., "Trump has said he will not voluntarily relinquish power. What will you do when he does that?" Seriously? This necessitated Pence to speak over his time limit, because he was trying to get some of his issues injected into the discussion.

But I think he ultimately won, because he managed to make the sound bite of the night Harris refusing to commit to not packing the Supreme Court. That issue alone is likely to keep the Senate red, as Middle Americans overwhelmingly fear what a Court, influenced by Democratic politics, would do to the First and Second Amendments. And they fear the Court will go back to the Roe standard on abortion rejected by Casey in 1992.

So Pence won this on that issue alone.
Not so sure - Pence spent a lot of time talking over Harris and ignoring the (female) moderator and every woman in the audience felt the sound bite moment was when Harris said "I'm speaking" as Pence talked over her. Pence's continual condescension and patronizing of the women will be felt on election day I think.
Subvert the dominant paradigm

User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18665
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by BDKJMU »

houndawg wrote:
Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:41 am
JoltinJoe wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 2:41 am
IMO, the moderator's questioning was transparently biased. The issues she chose; even the phrasing of the questions, i.e., "Trump has said he will not voluntarily relinquish power. What will you do when he does that?" Seriously? This necessitated Pence to speak over his time limit, because he was trying to get some of his issues injected into the discussion.

But I think he ultimately won, because he managed to make the sound bite of the night Harris refusing to commit to not packing the Supreme Court. That issue alone is likely to keep the Senate red, as Middle Americans overwhelmingly fear what a Court, influenced by Democratic politics, would do to the First and Second Amendments. And they fear the Court will go back to the Roe standard on abortion rejected by Casey in 1992.

So Pence won this on that issue alone.
Not so sure - Pence spent a lot of time talking over Harris and ignoring the (female) moderator and every woman in the audience felt the sound bite moment was when Harris said "I'm speaking" as Pence talked over her. Pence's continual condescension and patronizing of the women will be felt on election day I think.
Wrong. It was Harris who was seen as more condescending with her eye rolls, smirks, funny faces, and condescending remarks like the ‘I‘m speakibg‘. There‘s a reason she got less than 1% of the vote during the donk primary.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... nding.html#!
BLM: Burning Looting Marxists

User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 18637
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by JohnStOnge »

The scientific polls indicate that more people who watched the debate perceived Harris as the winner than perceived Pence as the winner.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image

User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 16066
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Lodi, CA

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by SuperHornet »

This debate was MUCH more civilized, yet I was still disgusted with Harris. She interrupted Pence about as often as Trump interrupted Biden (though her "interruptions" amounted to not much more than condescending snickering. She came across as phony with her claims to "faith," particularly when she confirmed her commitment to infanticide. She wants nothing more than a Commie police state. And her refusal to answer a certain question was quite disconcerting.

Pence, too, was evasive. I wasn't thrilled with that, but he WAS quite a bit more forthcoming than any of the other three.

I was REALLY upset with that so-called "moderator." She was about as one-sided as it gets when it came to "enforcing the rules," cracking down on Pence a whole lot more than Harris, and allowing Harris extra time to do what she wanted.

I, too, was wondering what was up with that fly. Brazen dude, wasn't he?
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.

User avatar
89Hen
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 36558
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by 89Hen »

JohnStOnge wrote:
Sat Oct 10, 2020 6:25 pm
The scientific polls indicate that more people who watched the debate perceived Harris as the winner than perceived Pence as the winner.
according to a CNN Instant Poll of registered voters who watched. About 6 in 10 (59%) said Harris won, while 38% said Vice President Mike Pence had the better night.

Those results roughly matched voters' expectations heading into the debate. In interviews conducted before the debate, 61% of those same voters said they expected Harris to win, 36% thought Pence would.
By my scientific method, looks like Pence won. Harris lost 2% and Pence gained 2% with the SAME people. So yeah.
Image

kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 47093
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:41 am
JohnStOnge wrote:
Sat Oct 10, 2020 6:25 pm
The scientific polls indicate that more people who watched the debate perceived Harris as the winner than perceived Pence as the winner.
according to a CNN Instant Poll of registered voters who watched. About 6 in 10 (59%) said Harris won, while 38% said Vice President Mike Pence had the better night.

Those results roughly matched voters' expectations heading into the debate. In interviews conducted before the debate, 61% of those same voters said they expected Harris to win, 36% thought Pence would.
By my scientific method, looks like Pence won. Harris lost 2% and Pence gained 2% with the SAME people. So yeah.
She just didn’t cover the spread.
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
89Hen
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 36558
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:42 am
89Hen wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:41 am




By my scientific method, looks like Pence won. Harris lost 2% and Pence gained 2% with the SAME people. So yeah.
She just didn’t cover the spread.
Clever, but not the same.
Image

User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 18637
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by JohnStOnge »

89Hen wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:05 am
kalm wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:42 am


She just didn’t cover the spread.
Clever, but not the same.
I don't think who they thought was going to win tells you much. People have been expecting Harris to win a VP debate with Pence for a long time. I can remember that, when Biden was considering who to pick, there were reports that the Trump team was worried that if it was Harris she would beat Pence in the VP debate.

In the CNN poll, Independents thought Harris won by a 63% to 31% margin and moderates thought Harris won by a 68% to 28% margin.

There was a morning consult poll that was better for Pence. It had Pence winning among Independent respondents by 41% to 39%. But that's a "statistical tie." He lost among moderates by 52% to 34%. What's also interesting is that, in the Morning Consult poll, Harris inspired a lot more confidence among Democrats than Pence described among Republicans. Democrats thought Harris did better by 89% to 6%. Republicans thought Pence did better by 81% to 12%.

I think it is pretty clear that, in terms of perception, Harris won. You can argue that she shouldn't have and I wouldn't be able to disagree because I didn't watch it. But she won in terms of perception.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image

User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 18637
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by JohnStOnge »

Just as an aside:

By the CNN poll, White college grads said Harris won by 64% to 32%. White people who did not graduate from college said Pence won by 52% to 44%.

Just one more thing to suggest that the "intelligence factor" is not working in favor of the Republicans. Look, I know that is insulting and I know that there are some very intelligent people who didn't graduate from college. Bill Gates doesn't have a college degree.

But we all know that if you took the average IQ of White college graduates and the average IQ of White people who have not graduated form college the average of the college graduates is going to be notably higher. It is what it is.

The Republican side is not the "smart" side right now. People who are more intelligent, on average, and more informed, on average, favor the Democrats.

Unfortunately, the Republican Party has become the Party of relatively ignorant White people. That's just the truth.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image

User avatar
89Hen
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 36558
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by 89Hen »

JohnStOnge wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 1:56 pm
Just as an aside:

By the CNN poll, White college grads said Harris won by 64% to 32%. White people who did not graduate from college said Pence won by 52% to 44%.

Just one more thing to suggest that the "intelligence factor" is not working in favor of the Republicans. Look, I know that is insulting and I know that there are some very intelligent people who didn't graduate from college. Bill Gates doesn't have a college degree.

But we all know that if you took the average IQ of White college graduates and the average IQ of White people who have not graduated form college the average of the college graduates is going to be notably higher. It is what it is.

The Republican side is not the "smart" side right now. People who are more intelligent, on average, and more informed, on average, favor the Democrats.

Unfortunately, the Republican Party has become the Party of relatively ignorant White people. That's just the truth.
We've been over this John. Degrees =/= intelligence. Some of the most educated people I've met are also the most dense people lacking common sense. :nod: :nod: :nod:
Image

User avatar
89Hen
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 36558
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by 89Hen »

JohnStOnge wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 1:53 pm
I didn't watch it
Enough said.
Image

User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18665
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by BDKJMU »

JohnStOnge wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 1:56 pm
Just as an aside:

By the CNN poll, White college grads said Harris won by 64% to 32%. White people who did not graduate from college said Pence won by 52% to 44%.

Just one more thing to suggest that the "intelligence factor" is not working in favor of the Republicans. Look, I know that is insulting and I know that there are some very intelligent people who didn't graduate from college. Bill Gates doesn't have a college degree.

But we all know that if you took the average IQ of White college graduates and the average IQ of White people who have not graduated form college the average of the college graduates is going to be notably higher. It is what it is.

The Republican side is not the "smart" side right now. People who are more intelligent, on average, and more informed, on average, favor the Democrats.

Unfortunately, the Republican Party has become the Party of relatively ignorant White people. That's just the truth.
Which wasn’t a poll of likely voters.
BLM: Burning Looting Marxists

houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 17791
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by houndawg »

BDKJMU wrote:
Sat Oct 10, 2020 7:23 am
houndawg wrote:
Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:41 am


Not so sure - Pence spent a lot of time talking over Harris and ignoring the (female) moderator and every woman in the audience felt the sound bite moment was when Harris said "I'm speaking" as Pence talked over her. Pence's continual condescension and patronizing of the women will be felt on election day I think.
Wrong. It was Harris who was seen as more condescending with her eye rolls, smirks, funny faces, and condescending remarks like the ‘I‘m speakibg‘. There‘s a reason she got less than 1% of the vote during the donk primary.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... nding.html#!
by butthurt males :coffee: - every woman in the nation related, negatively, to Pence's patronizing condescension.


Blue tsunami, bro. :thumb:
Subvert the dominant paradigm

houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 17791
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by houndawg »

SuperHornet wrote:
Sun Oct 11, 2020 7:58 am
This debate was MUCH more civilized, yet I was still disgusted with Harris. She interrupted Pence about as often as Trump interrupted Biden (though her "interruptions" amounted to not much more than condescending snickering. She came across as phony with her claims to "faith," particularly when she confirmed her commitment to infanticide. She wants nothing more than a Commie police state. And her refusal to answer a certain question was quite disconcerting.

Pence, too, was evasive. I wasn't thrilled with that, but he WAS quite a bit more forthcoming than any of the other three.

I was REALLY upset with that so-called "moderator." She was about as one-sided as it gets when it came to "enforcing the rules," cracking down on Pence a whole lot more than Harris, and allowing Harris extra time to do what she wanted.

I, too, was wondering what was up with that fly. Brazen dude, wasn't he?
He found a stool he liked. 8-)
Subvert the dominant paradigm

User avatar
DuckDuckGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1211
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:56 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
Location: Portland, OR

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by DuckDuckGriz »

houndawg wrote:
Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:34 pm
SuperHornet wrote:
Sun Oct 11, 2020 7:58 am
This debate was MUCH more civilized, yet I was still disgusted with Harris. She interrupted Pence about as often as Trump interrupted Biden (though her "interruptions" amounted to not much more than condescending snickering. She came across as phony with her claims to "faith," particularly when she confirmed her commitment to infanticide. She wants nothing more than a Commie police state. And her refusal to answer a certain question was quite disconcerting.

Pence, too, was evasive. I wasn't thrilled with that, but he WAS quite a bit more forthcoming than any of the other three.

I was REALLY upset with that so-called "moderator." She was about as one-sided as it gets when it came to "enforcing the rules," cracking down on Pence a whole lot more than Harris, and allowing Harris extra time to do what she wanted.

I, too, was wondering what was up with that fly. Brazen dude, wasn't he?
He found a stool he liked. 8-)
This is no time to be fecetious.

User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 18637
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by JohnStOnge »

89Hen wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 2:13 pm
JohnStOnge wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 1:56 pm
Just as an aside:

By the CNN poll, White college grads said Harris won by 64% to 32%. White people who did not graduate from college said Pence won by 52% to 44%.

Just one more thing to suggest that the "intelligence factor" is not working in favor of the Republicans. Look, I know that is insulting and I know that there are some very intelligent people who didn't graduate from college. Bill Gates doesn't have a college degree.

But we all know that if you took the average IQ of White college graduates and the average IQ of White people who have not graduated form college the average of the college graduates is going to be notably higher. It is what it is.

The Republican side is not the "smart" side right now. People who are more intelligent, on average, and more informed, on average, favor the Democrats.

Unfortunately, the Republican Party has become the Party of relatively ignorant White people. That's just the truth.
We've been over this John. Degrees =/= intelligence. Some of the most educated people I've met are also the most dense people lacking common sense. :nod: :nod: :nod:
Yes I know that is the populist schtick. But we all know that if you were to do any kind of test as to what is going on in the world the people with college degrees would score higher, on average, than the people without them would. There is no evidence, at all, that people without college degrees have more "common sense" (however that is defined) than people with college degrees do.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image

User avatar
89Hen
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 36558
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by 89Hen »

JohnStOnge wrote:
Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:23 pm
Yes I know that is the populist schtick. But we all know that if you were to do any kind of test as to what is going on in the world the people with college degrees would score higher, on average, than the people without them would. There is no evidence, at all, that people without college degrees have more "common sense" (however that is defined) than people with college degrees do.
Depends on what you define as "what is going on". People with college degrees probably know that Iceland had big banking reform, but those same people think it would work in the US. So...
Image

User avatar
89Hen
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 36558
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by 89Hen »

houndawg wrote:
Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:31 pm
by butthurt males :coffee: - every woman in the nation related, negatively, to Pence's patronizing condescension.
Mrs 89 said she cannot vote for Biden because of that smarmy bitch Harris since she would end up POTUS pretty quickly. So you are incorrect. Not surprising. :coffee:
Image

kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 47093
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
Thu Oct 15, 2020 6:11 am
houndawg wrote:
Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:31 pm
by butthurt males :coffee: - every woman in the nation related, negatively, to Pence's patronizing condescension.
Mrs 89 said she cannot vote for Biden because of that smarmy bitch Harris since she would end up POTUS pretty quickly. So you are incorrect. Not surprising. :coffee:
This is THE reason Hillary lost.

Women in power have it tough from a personality standpoint, even with other women.
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 14665
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote:
Thu Oct 15, 2020 6:58 am
89Hen wrote:
Thu Oct 15, 2020 6:11 am


Mrs 89 said she cannot vote for Biden because of that smarmy bitch Harris since she would end up POTUS pretty quickly. So you are incorrect. Not surprising. :coffee:
This is THE reason Hillary lost.

Women in power have it tough from a personality standpoint, even with other women.
Well, that and the tremendous rank corruption on her part. That wasn't really a positive for her. :rofl:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation

User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9277
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
A.K.A.: Unification88
Location: Fence Sitter & Ball-Sack Splitter

Re: VP debate 10/7 9 PM ECB.

Post by UNI88 »

kalm wrote:
Thu Oct 15, 2020 6:58 am
89Hen wrote:
Thu Oct 15, 2020 6:11 am

Mrs 89 said she cannot vote for Biden because of that smarmy bitch Harris since she would end up POTUS pretty quickly. So you are incorrect. Not surprising. :coffee:
This is THE reason Hillary lost.

Women in power have it tough from a personality standpoint, even with other women.
I don't think I'm intimidated by strong, successful women but I think that in Hillary's case the highlighted term is accurate. I don't know if it is in Harris'. I don't care if she used sex to help get ahead. If she's a ho for sleeping her way up the ladder then what is Melania? You use the assets you have and are willing to use - hard work, brains, ideas, money, charisma, sex, etc.

Post Reply