Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Pwns wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 5:47 pm https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden- ... -us-chinas


I'm sure all we need now is for fatcat political donors to be able to make more money with the Commie Chinese and they'll modernize their human rights and become a more conscientious military and economic power. It's worked great so far.

Thanks, Biden voters.

We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China’s rise in a manner consistent with an open, fair, rules-based, regional order,” Sullivan said. “This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight, and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention. It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.”

JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:40 pm Details of what he said from the article:

We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China’s rise in a manner consistent with an open, fair, rules-based, regional order,” Sullivan said. “This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight, and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention. It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.”

Oh yeah, that is HORRIBLE.

JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:40 pm Details of what he said from the article:

We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China’s rise in a manner consistent with an open, fair, rules-based, regional order,” Sullivan said. “This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight, and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention. It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.”

Oh yeah, that is HORRIBLE.

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:33 pm

JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:40 pm Details of what he said from the article:

Oh yeah, that is HORRIBLE.

What’s horrible is that idiots like you would believe there’s ANYTHING altruistic about China’s rise, anything FAIR about their rise, anything “rules based” about their efforts. You have gone full retard, John, and frankly I’m embarrassed FOR you.

JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:40 pm Details of what he said from the article:

We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China’s rise in a manner consistent with an open, fair, rules-based, regional order,” Sullivan said. “This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight, and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention. It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.”

Oh yeah, that is HORRIBLE.

89Hen wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 7:42 pm

JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:40 pm Details of what he said from the article:



Oh yeah, that is HORRIBLE.

Your conversion is complete.

kalm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 9:44 am

89Hen wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 7:42 pm
Your conversion is complete.

As is the conversion of conk free traders to protectionists. Ganny knows...

UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 10:41 am

kalm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 9:44 am

As is the conversion of conk free traders to protectionists. Ganny knows...

Free trade is a two-way street. China doesn't practice free trade and we would be foolish to give them open access to our markets when they don't do the same for us. China and the rest of the world take access to US markets for granted and then get upset when we ask for equal access to their markets. Post WWII, greater access to US markets was important for rebuilding countries and for world peace. It's no longer necessary and it's time to reset expectations. I want truly free trade and we might need to be perceived as protectionist in order to get other countries to give us the same access to their markets.

UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 10:41 am

kalm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 9:44 am

As is the conversion of conk free traders to protectionists. Ganny knows...

Free trade is a two-way street. China doesn't practice free trade and we would be foolish to give them open access to our markets when they don't do the same for us. China and the rest of the world take access to US markets for granted and then get upset when we ask for equal access to their markets. Post WWII, greater access to US markets was important for rebuilding countries and for world peace. It's no longer necessary and it's time to reset expectations. I want truly free trade and we might need to be perceived as protectionist in order to get other countries to give us the same access to their markets.

kalm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:36 pm

UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 10:41 am
Free trade is a two-way street. China doesn't practice free trade and we would be foolish to give them open access to our markets when they don't do the same for us. China and the rest of the world take access to US markets for granted and then get upset when we ask for equal access to their markets. Post WWII, greater access to US markets was important for rebuilding countries and for world peace. It's no longer necessary and it's time to reset expectations. I want truly free trade and we might need to be perceived as protectionist in order to get other countries to give us the same access to their markets.

Ahhh...now you’re just sounding like Bernie...

JohnStOnge wrote:Details of what he said from the article:

We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China’s rise in a manner consistent with an open, fair, rules-based, regional order,” Sullivan said. “This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight, and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention. It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.”

Oh yeah, that is HORRIBLE.

CID1990 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:55 pm

JohnStOnge wrote:Details of what he said from the article:



Oh yeah, that is HORRIBLE.

Given that he doesn’t realize that that ship sailed around 1995 and it is now too late to compel that kind of behavior from China.. yeah - not just horrible but ignorant as well

Like Joe Kennedy and Henry Ford .... ignorant, or compliant?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

AZGrizFan wrote:

CID1990 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:55 pm Given that he doesn’t realize that that ship sailed around 1995 and it is now too late to compel that kind of behavior from China.. yeah - not just horrible but ignorant as well

Like Joe Kennedy and Henry Ford .... ignorant, or compliant?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well hello, stranger!

CID1990 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:01 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
Well hello, stranger!

Don’t get used to it.

I just had a rough day and felt like stomping a puppy or two

So I came in here and searched up a rando JSO post


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk