Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:09 am

houndawg wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 9:27 pm

You say that as if the Republicans have more than one candidate.

There are at least 10 conservatives I could name off the top of my head who’d wipe the floor with Biden or Harris in literally ANY political discussion/conversation.

This is the extent of Kamala Harris’s intelligence:

It is time for us to do what we have been doing, and that time is every day. Every day, it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down.

Why, it’s brilliant!

houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:49 pm

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:09 am



There are at least 10 conservatives I could name off the top of my head who’d wipe the floor with Biden or Harris in literally ANY political discussion/conversation.

This is the extent of Kamala Harris’s intelligence:



Why, it’s brilliant!

Looks like you missed the point entirely as you seem to do with metronomic regularity - let me preface the point by telling you that I'm about to explain the point that you missed - the point is that it doesn't matter if you have 1,000 conservatives that out-debate Harris or Biden - your candidate is Trump - the Republican Party doesn't break wind without his approval and every one of them with a couple(2) of exceptions pisses down their leg at the thought of crossing him. And debate isn't necessary: people will vote for or against him regardless of which feeble old corporate hack the Democrats put up. Last time they voted there were 7,000,000 more votes for the tired old hack who is likely already drooling in his porridge than there were for Trump. (Who btw way lost the popular vote by nearly 3,000,000 votes to the most unpopular politician in recent history.)

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:01 pm

houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:49 pm



Looks like you missed the point entirely as you seem to do with metronomic regularity - let me preface the point by telling you that I'm about to explain the point that you missed - the point is that it doesn't matter if you have 1,000 conservatives that out-debate Harris or Biden - your candidate is Trump - the Republican Party doesn't break wind without his approval and every one of them with a couple(2) of exceptions pisses down their leg at the thought of crossing him. And debate isn't necessary: people will vote for or against him regardless of which feeble old corporate hack the Democrats put up. Last time they voted there were 7,000,000 more votes for the tired old hack who is likely already drooling in his porridge than there were for Trump. (Who btw way lost the popular vote by nearly 3,000,000 votes to the most unpopular politician in recent history.)

Until our candidate IS Trump, I won’t believe that.

And at the end of the day, even if it IS Trump, that only accounts for the next four years. After that, with the hand the libtards have shown, they may never sniff the White House again.

houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:17 pm

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:01 pm

Until our candidate IS Trump, I won’t believe that.

And at the end of the day, even if it IS Trump, that only accounts for the next four years. After that, with the hand the libtards have shown, they may never sniff the White House again.

How will it not be Trump? You seriously think he'd actually select somebody else over himself?

Gimme some of what you're smoking, its obviously of very high quality

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:22 pm

houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:17 pm

How will it not be Trump? You seriously think he'd actually select somebody else over himself?

Gimme some of what you're smoking, its obviously of very high quality

Well I guess we’ll know in the next several months.

houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:27 pm

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:22 pm

Well I guess we’ll know in the next several months.

Who's going to contest his will in the Republican Party? Nobody, thats who.

89Hen wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:42 am Joe has been MIA this week. He must be resting up for his grueling press conference today where he'll call on a couple pre-approved reporters who will throw him a few softballs.

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:22 pm

houndawg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:17 pm

How will it not be Trump? You seriously think he'd actually select somebody else over himself?

Gimme some of what you're smoking, its obviously of very high quality

Well I guess we’ll know in the next several months.

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:58 pm

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:22 pm

Well I guess we’ll know in the next several months.

Don’t think we’ll know until after the midterms..

LeadBolt wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:28 pm I think that The Federalist is in danger of being investigated for reporting relative truth.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/19/bi ... on-claims/

GannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:52 pm

89Hen wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:42 am Joe has been MIA this week. He must be resting up for his grueling press conference today where he'll call on a couple pre-approved reporters who will throw him a few softballs.

The sad thing is, it could be completely scripted (and it likely is very close to that) and he'll still struggle with it. We're approaching elderly abuse here. If he won't step aside, someone has to be thinking when to pull the lever on the 25th amendment.

89Hen wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:41 pm

GannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:52 pm

The sad thing is, it could be completely scripted (and it likely is very close to that) and he'll still struggle with it. We're approaching elderly abuse here. If he won't step aside, someone has to be thinking when to pull the lever on the 25th amendment.

It's unwatchable. His answers are simply horrible on just about everything. Like trying to listen to a conversation while you're drunk. It sounds like words, but you can't quite understand.

Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:11 pm

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:09 am



There are at least 10 conservatives I could name off the top of my head who’d wipe the floor with Biden or Harris in literally ANY political discussion/conversation.

This is the extent of Kamala Harris’s intelligence:



Why, it’s brilliant!

It won't take much to beat Harris. She simply isn't up to the task. Remind me how she fared in the primaries.... Democrats didn't want her.

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:32 pm

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:58 pm
Don’t think we’ll know until after the midterms..

Which are in several months.

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:32 pm

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:58 pm
Don’t think we’ll know until after the midterms..

Which are in several months.

AZGrizFan wrote:

89Hen wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:41 pm It's unwatchable. His answers are simply horrible on just about everything. Like trying to listen to a conversation while you're drunk. It sounds like words, but you can't quite understand.

Claims he’s “overperformed” expectations.

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:15 pm

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:32 pm

Which are in several months.

They aren’t for 9 1/2+ months (11/8).

UNI88 wrote:

LeadBolt wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:28 pm I think that The Federalist is in danger of being investigated for reporting relative truth.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/19/bi ... on-claims/

Awesome images in that article ... is it safe to click on the links?





Biden's hyperbole is excessive but I'm not sure it's worse than Trump's was.

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:27 pm

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:15 pm
They aren’t for 9 1/2+ months (11/8).

Is that or is that not “several months”? FFS….

houndawg wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 9:09 am

There are at least 10 conservatives I could name off the top of my head who’d wipe the floor with Biden or Harris in literally ANY political discussion/conversation.

This is the extent of Kamala Harris’s intelligence:
Why, it’s brilliant!

Looks like you missed the point entirely as you seem to do with metronomic regularity - let me preface the point by telling you that I'm about to explain the point that you missed - the point is that it doesn't matter if you have 1,000 conservatives that out-debate Harris or Biden - your candidate is Trump - the Republican Party doesn't break wind without his approval and every one of them with a couple(2) of exceptions pisses down their leg at the thought of crossing him. And debate isn't necessary: people will vote for or against him regardless of which feeble old corporate hack the Democrats put up. Last time they voted there were 7,000,000 more votes for the tired old hack who is likely already drooling in his porridge than there were for Trump. (Who btw way lost the popular vote by nearly 3,000,000 votes to the most unpopular politician in recent history.)

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:37 pm

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:27 pm

Is that or is that not “several months”? FFS….

No. The definition of several is ‘more than 2 but not many’. I would say several months would be 3-4, maybe 5 tops..

And FWIW I don’t think Trump will make an announcement Novor Dec after the midterms. I’m guessing Jan 2023 at the earliest, so a year or more. Remember last time he announced was June 2015.

So either way, we aren’t going to know in ‘several months’…

Spoiler: show

And I looked up the definition too…nowhere does it say “5 tops”. Few is defined as “not many” e.g., three roses…so 3-4 would be “a few months”. Several months is more than that, and certainly more than 5.

Here endeth the lesson.

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 6:58 pm

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 4:37 pm
No. The definition of several is ‘more than 2 but not many’. I would say several months would be 3-4, maybe 5 tops..

And FWIW I don’t think Trump will make an announcement Novor Dec after the midterms. I’m guessing Jan 2023 at the earliest, so a year or more. Remember last time he announced was June 2015.

So either way, we aren’t going to know in ‘several months’…

THIS. This is why people here give you so much shit. You want to dissect and wordsmith every fucking post, no matter how inane. I would say several is some # < 10-12. But hey, you do you.

Spoiler: show

And I looked up the definition too…nowhere does it say “5 tops”. Few is defined as “not many” e.g., three roses…so 3-4 would be “a few months”. Several months is more than that, and certainly more than 5.

Here endeth the lesson.