January 6 - How much do you care?

[Ibanez]

They've should been arrested, tried and punished. Just like the MAGAts that attacked the US Capital. That's been my position since the very beginning.

You have a right to PEACEFULLY assemble. Once you engage in the opposite of that, IMHO, you forfeit any protection of that right.

Now you’re flip flopping.
Before you said

attempting to enter a government building by force during a riot

justified her being shot.

Now your saying in regards to BLANTIFA ‘attempting to enter a govt building by force during a riot’

should been arrested, tried and punished.

as opposed to being all shot.

I would say being shot by police is punishment for breaking the law.

Besides, i'm not flip-flopping, at best you can argue inconsistent but only in a very nit-picky way. But not really, b/c I believe we should arrest, try and punish anyone that involved in the mayhem that occurred on Jan 6.

[AZGrizFan]

Now you’re flip flopping.
Before you said
justified her being shot.

Now your saying in regards to BLANTIFA ‘attempting to enter a govt building by force during a riot’

as opposed to being all shot.

I would say being shot by police is punishment for breaking the law.

Besides, i'm not flip-flopping, at best you can argue inconsistent but only in a very nit-picky way. But not really, b/c I believe we should arrest, try and punish anyone that involved in the mayhem that occurred on Jan 6.

So Kim Potter was within her rights as a police officer?

[UNI88]

I would say being shot by police is punishment for breaking the law.

Besides, i'm not flip-flopping, at best you can argue inconsistent but only in a very nit-picky way. But not really, b/c I believe we should arrest, try and punish anyone that involved in the mayhem that occurred on Jan 6.

So Kim Potter was within her rights as a police officer?

Two different situations. Daunte Wright was about to drive away when Kim Potter pulled the wrong weapon and shot him. Ashli Babbitt was shot while trying to force her way into the Speakers Lobby.

[Ibanez]

I would say being shot by police is punishment for breaking the law.

Besides, i'm not flip-flopping, at best you can argue inconsistent but only in a very nit-picky way. But not really, b/c I believe we should arrest, try and punish anyone that involved in the mayhem that occurred on Jan 6.

So Kim Potter was within her rights as a police officer?

Two different situations, hoss. But nice try.

[AZGrizFan]

So Kim Potter was within her rights as a police officer?

Two different situations, hoss. But nice try.

Well of course they're two different sits, but he was breaking the law.

[houndawg]

I would say being shot by police is punishment for breaking the law.

Besides, i'm not flip-flopping, at best you can argue inconsistent but only in a very nit-picky way. But not really, b/c I believe we should arrest, try and punish anyone that involved in the mayhem that occurred on Jan 6.

So Kim Potter was within her rights as a police officer?

Send me some of what you're smoking.

[AZGrizFan]

So Kim Potter was within her rights as a police officer?

Send me some of what you're smoking.

Just trying to determine where the line is drawn.

[houndawg]

Send me some of what you're smoking.

Just trying to determine where the line is drawn.

...her case wasn't about being within her rights, it was about colossal incompetence, at best

[AZGrizFan]

Just trying to determine where the line is drawn.

...her case wasn't about being within her rights, it was about colossal incompetence, at best

No one’s asserting there wasn’t incompetence. That’s not the argument here.
Did he or did he not break the law?

[houndawg]

...her case wasn't about being within her rights, it was about colossal incompetence, at best

No one’s asserting there wasn’t incompetence. That’s not the argument here.
Did he or did he not break the law?

the media says there was a warrant - that doesn't excuse being the judge, jury, and executioner - was she within her rights to tase him? Yes, based on whats in the media now

[AZGrizFan]

No one’s asserting there wasn’t incompetence. That’s not the argument here.
Did he or did he not break the law?

the media says there was a warrant - that doesn't excuse being the judge, jury, and executioner - was she within her rights to tase him? Yes, based on whats in the media now

He had an outstanding warrant (probably why he attempted to flee), he had broken the law, and he could have used the vehicle as a weapon (there’s PLENTY of case law to support that.

Was she within here rights to shoot (even though video evidence supports her assertion it wasn’t her intention)?

[houndawg]

the media says there was a warrant - that doesn't excuse being the judge, jury, and executioner - was she within her rights to tase him? Yes, based on whats in the media now

He had an outstanding warrant (probably why he attempted to flee), he had broken the law, and he could have used the vehicle as a weapon (there’s PLENTY of case law to support that.

Was she within here rights to shoot (even though video evidence supports her assertion it wasn’t her intention)?

I don't think she was because they had his ID and VIN, he wasn't going to be loose much longer.

What was the warrant for?

[AZGrizFan]

He had an outstanding warrant (probably why he attempted to flee), he had broken the law, and he could have used the vehicle as a weapon (there’s PLENTY of case law to support that.

Was she within here rights to shoot (even though video evidence supports her assertion it wasn’t her intention)?

I don't think she was because they had his ID and VIN, he wasn't going to be loose much longer.

What was the warrant for?

Guess she should have waited until he ran over the rookie.

[houndawg]

I don't think she was because they had his ID and VIN, he wasn't going to be loose much longer.

What was the warrant for?

Guess she should have waited until he ran over the rookie.

Red herring, never happened - and wasn't going to given the rookie was not in front of the fleeing car. You're getting lazy in your old age.

What was the warrant for?

[AZGrizFan]

Guess she should have waited until he ran over the rookie.

Red herring, never happened - and wasn't going to given the rookie was not in front of the fleeing car. You're getting lazy in your old age.

What was the warrant for?

I have no idea. You’re the one who said he had a warrant.

And it’s good to know cars don’t go in reverse anymore. Makes us all a lot safer.

[houndawg]

Red herring, never happened - and wasn't going to given the rookie was not in front of the fleeing car. You're getting lazy in your old age.

What was the warrant for?

I have no idea. You’re the one who said he had a warrant.

And it’s good to know cars don’t go in reverse anymore. Makes us all a lot safer.

You're trying to conjure something from a vacuum with this red herring. Look at the video again

[houndawg]

Red herring, never happened - and wasn't going to given the rookie was not in front of the fleeing car. You're getting lazy in your old age.

What was the warrant for?

I have no idea. You’re the one who said he had a warrant.

And it’s good to know cars don’t go in reverse anymore. Makes us all a lot safer.

For weapons posession - don't you read about anything you comment on? Why do I have to wipe your nose and help you find an argument? This place has gone to shit I tell ya...

[CID1990]

He had an outstanding warrant (probably why he attempted to flee), he had broken the law, and he could have used the vehicle as a weapon (there’s PLENTY of case law to support that.

Was she within here rights to shoot (even though video evidence supports her assertion it wasn’t her intention)?

I don't think she was because they had his ID and VIN, he wasn't going to be loose much longer.

What was the warrant for?

BINGO

They knew who he was

Let him drive away, pick him up later when he’s at Kroger buying grape drank


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AZGrizFan]

I have no idea. You’re the one who said he had a warrant.

And it’s good to know cars don’t go in reverse anymore. Makes us all a lot safer.

For weapons posession - don't you read about anything you comment on? Why do I have to wipe your nose and help you find an argument? This place has gone to shit I tell ya...

You’re not helping your case here. Outstanding warrant for weapons possession?

[bobbythekidd]

I don't think she was because they had his ID and VIN, he wasn't going to be loose much longer.

What was the warrant for?

BINGO

They knew who he was

Let him drive away, pick him up later when he’s at Kroger buying grape drank


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well shit. You are asking cops to act like a police organization. To protect and serve. We haven't been doing that for years.

[houndawg]

For weapons posession - don't you read about anything you comment on? Why do I have to wipe your nose and help you find an argument? This place has gone to shit I tell ya...

You’re not helping your case here. Outstanding warrant for weapons possession?

Well, somebody has to argue your side. Back in the day it used to be you.

[houndawg]

BINGO

They knew who he was

Let him drive away, pick him up later when he’s at Kroger buying grape drank


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well shit. You are asking cops to act like a police organization. To protect and serve. We haven't been doing that for years.

When you're overwhelmed you try to check the things at the top of the list first - so job 1 is protect the private property of the very wealthy from the underclass/what's left of the middle class.

[Ibanez]

the media says there was a warrant - that doesn't excuse being the judge, jury, and executioner - was she within her rights to tase him? Yes, based on whats in the media now

He had an outstanding warrant (probably why he attempted to flee), he had broken the law, and he could have used the vehicle as a weapon (there’s PLENTY of case law to support that.

Was she within here rights to shoot (even though video evidence supports her assertion it wasn’t her intention)?

I'm not sure attempting to flee is the same as riotting against the US Government.

Also, why couldn't have Kim let him run off? They knew who he was and where he lived, go get him with backup and maybe a seasoned pro or two that knows the difference between a taser and a gun.

[houndawg]

On a scale of 1-10 how much do you care about January 6th? 10 being it was as bad as Pearl Harbor and 9/11. 1 if you don't give a damn.

I'm about a hard 6/soft 7 because of the feeble response.

The leadership of the Capitol Police were definitely exposed as to where they stand. Combat ready when the lefties come around, pants down and bent over holding their ankles for their fellow travelers on the right.

[89Hen]

Combat ready when the lefties come around....

They were around for weeks.