FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53243
I don't disagree with removing the dams on the Klamath but what about the impact on green energy production? Will we need to burn more fossil fuels to compensate for the loss of generating capacity?kalm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 5:04 pm …removal is coming to the Klamath basin and that’s a good thing.
Snake and Columbia need to be moved on next.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/save-s ... XthniMNhAc
Indeed and it will require serious cooperation from all parties and engineering.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 6:13 pmI don't disagree with removing the dams on the Klamath but what about the impact on green energy production? Will we need to burn more fossil fuels to compensate for the loss of generating capacity?kalm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 5:04 pm …removal is coming to the Klamath basin and that’s a good thing.
Snake and Columbia need to be moved on next.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/save-s ... XthniMNhAc
The Snake and Columbia are different animals. If were' smart, we'll have plans in place for handling the impact on energy production, shipping and crop irrigation before removing dams on those rivers.
No one gives a fuck about the Dam Cup, SH. Sheesh!
Make the lakeside homeowners responsible.HI54UNI wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 7:18 am There's a small dam in the community where I live. Big debate in the community about what to do with it. It needs repair and the county taxpayers are on the hook for it. County and city had been working on a grant to partially take it out, add fish ladders, and create a whitewater rapids course/area. A very vocal minority that live on the reservoir convinced enough of the city council to kill the idea. Missed the chance for a bunch of grant money and the county is still stuck with an aging dam.
UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 6:13 pmI don't disagree with removing the dams on the Klamath but what about the impact on green energy production? Will we need to burn more fossil fuels to compensate for the loss of generating capacity?kalm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 5:04 pm …removal is coming to the Klamath basin and that’s a good thing.
Snake and Columbia need to be moved on next.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/save-s ... XthniMNhAc
The Snake and Columbia are different animals. If were' smart, we'll have plans in place for handling the impact on energy production, shipping and crop irrigation before removing dams on those rivers.
I know it is. The dams are already built and providing energy without the climate impact of fossil fuel but the damage to the ecosystem is real and should be considered. The amount of energy the Klamath dams produce seems to be very small as well.dbackjon wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 10:17 amUNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 6:13 pm
I don't disagree with removing the dams on the Klamath but what about the impact on green energy production? Will we need to burn more fossil fuels to compensate for the loss of generating capacity?
The Snake and Columbia are different animals. If were' smart, we'll have plans in place for handling the impact on energy production, shipping and crop irrigation before removing dams on those rivers.
Green energy is in the eye of the beholder - what is green about causing species to go extinct, and disrupting an ecosystem completely?
Just build a bunch of nuke plants on Hanford Reservation
That may happen. This week the county decided to offer the dam for sale. Pretty much said to the rich loudmouth who has been the most vocal - you want to keep it you can buy it and do what you want and if you don't buy it we are going to do what we want and you can STFU.dbackjon wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 10:15 amMake the lakeside homeowners responsible.HI54UNI wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 7:18 am There's a small dam in the community where I live. Big debate in the community about what to do with it. It needs repair and the county taxpayers are on the hook for it. County and city had been working on a grant to partially take it out, add fish ladders, and create a whitewater rapids course/area. A very vocal minority that live on the reservoir convinced enough of the city council to kill the idea. Missed the chance for a bunch of grant money and the county is still stuck with an aging dam.
Is it a public waterway? Can a dam on a public waterway be privatized?HI54UNI wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:09 pmThat may happen. This week the county decided to offer the dam for sale. Pretty much said to the rich loudmouth who has been the most vocal - you want to keep it you can buy it and do what you want and if you don't buy it we are going to do what we want and you can STFU.
There are a few dams in Iowa owned by private associations, usually to create a recreational lake. They have to follow all the relevant regulations, permits, etc. so I would think the county could sell it to an association or individual. I'm sure the county would gladly sell it for $1 to be rid of it. I can't believe anyone would be stupid enough to buy it. The county had a study done that said the dam is in fair but deteriorating condition. Rich loudmouth paid for his own study that came to the same conclusion. I hope he does buy it so it takes me as a taxpayer off the hook for it.UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:41 pmIs it a public waterway? Can a dam on a public waterway be privatized?HI54UNI wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:09 pm
That may happen. This week the county decided to offer the dam for sale. Pretty much said to the rich loudmouth who has been the most vocal - you want to keep it you can buy it and do what you want and if you don't buy it we are going to do what we want and you can STFU.
Not trying to kill the idea, if the loudmouths want to keep the dam and their reservoir then they should pay for it. Curious about the logistics.
Yes, the Klamath ones are a no-brainer. The larger ones you do have to account for the fact that a lot of the damage is already done, and until we can replace with as clean (now that they are built) sources, hard to pull the plug so to speak.UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 11:08 amI know it is. The dams are already built and providing energy without the climate impact of fossil fuel but the damage to the ecosystem is real and should be considered. The amount of energy the Klamath dams produce seems to be very small as well.
You'll have to convince the eco-knights that nuke plants are good.
HI54UNI wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:09 pmThat may happen. This week the county decided to offer the dam for sale. Pretty much said to the rich loudmouth who has been the most vocal - you want to keep it you can buy it and do what you want and if you don't buy it we are going to do what we want and you can STFU.
That was my reaction when I heard what the county decided to do.dbackjon wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 1:35 pmHI54UNI wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:09 pm
That may happen. This week the county decided to offer the dam for sale. Pretty much said to the rich loudmouth who has been the most vocal - you want to keep it you can buy it and do what you want and if you don't buy it we are going to do what we want and you can STFU.
