Missing document

[houndawg]

What happens if Trump's lawyers can' produce the missing document?

[houndawg]

Its been a week now since it was first reported that the Iran document Trump referenced in his discussion with unauthorized personnel has gone missing and......crickets. Now, nobody is saying that it is related to the $2,000,000,000 that the Saudis gave to his son-in-law for...something, and it could all be a coincidence but, many people are saying...

[houndawg]

I'm disappointed, SG, thought you'd be on this like a chicken on a junebug...you've lost a step..

[kalm]

I assume it will now be a part of discovery but it’s interesting why Bedminster wasn’t raided.

[bobbythekidd]

I assume it will now be a part of discovery but it’s interesting why Bedminster wasn’t raided.

To get a search warrant, the probable cause/evidence must be "fresh" for a judge to sign off on it. The intel that docs were brought to Bedminster is over a year old. No way they would have been granted one without some info that's more recent.

That pesky fourth amendment poking it's head up on that one. If it wasn't that way then your old friend that you had a falling out with could say that you had drugs in your house when you were in your 20's and the law could come ransack your place tomorrow.

[kalm]

I assume it will now be a part of discovery but it’s interesting why Bedminster wasn’t raided.

To get a search warrant, the probable cause/evidence must be "fresh" for a judge to sign off on it. The intel that docs were brought to Bedminster is over a year old. No way they would have been granted one without some info that's more recent.

That pesky fourth amendment poking it's head up on that one. If it wasn't that way then your old friend that you had a falling out with could say that you had drugs in your house when you were in your 20's and the law could come ransack your place tomorrow.

That makes a bunch of sense. Thank you.

[bobbythekidd]

To get a search warrant, the probable cause/evidence must be "fresh" for a judge to sign off on it. The intel that docs were brought to Bedminster is over a year old. No way they would have been granted one without some info that's more recent.

That pesky fourth amendment poking it's head up on that one. If it wasn't that way then your old friend that you had a falling out with could say that you had drugs in your house when you were in your 20's and the law could come ransack your place tomorrow.

That makes a bunch of sense. Thank you.

The New York Times hits Donald Trump with a devastating Tuesday night bombshell, revealing that “Special Counsel Jack Smith subpoenaed surveillance footage from Trump’s Bedminster resort in New Jersey” just as he did for Mar-a-Lago.

This is courtesy of the almost 30 Secret Service Agents that have testified in a separate grand jury about Trump.

Look for another search warrant soon.

[kalm]

That makes a bunch of sense. Thank you.

The New York Times hits Donald Trump with a devastating Tuesday night bombshell, revealing that “Special Counsel Jack Smith subpoenaed surveillance footage from Trump’s Bedminster resort in New Jersey” just as he did for Mar-a-Lago.

This is courtesy of the almost 30 Secret Service Agents that have testified in a separate grand jury about Trump.

Look for another search warrant soon.

It’s been puzzling why Bedminster hasn’t been searched. They were waiting on testimony and to flip witnesses.

Garland is taking some heat for slow rolling the investigation from the start. That’s seems like a fair criticism unless the documents case is truly just the first course.

[houndawg]

That makes a bunch of sense. Thank you.

The New York Times hits Donald Trump with a devastating Tuesday night bombshell, revealing that “Special Counsel Jack Smith subpoenaed surveillance footage from Trump’s Bedminster resort in New Jersey” just as he did for Mar-a-Lago.

This is courtesy of the almost 30 Secret Service Agents that have testified in a separate grand jury about Trump.

Look for another search warrant soon.

That one was interesting I'm sure - I wonder what the two agents who were going to offer contradicting testimony about the episode with trump and his driver said.

[bobbythekidd]

Doesn't matter who they were. Their bravado followed by their silence tells you all you need to know about their claims.

[houndawg]

Doesn't matter who they were. Their bravado followed by their silence tells you all you need to know about their claims.

Wonder what else are they lying about.

[BDKJMU]

What happens if Trump's lawyers can' produce the missing document?

How do you know Trump or his lawyers ever had the document?

[houndawg]

What happens if Trump's lawyers can' produce the missing document?

How do you know Trump or his lawyers ever had the document?

Because he said he didn't have it.

[UNI88]

What happens if Trump's lawyers can' produce the missing document?

How do you know Trump or his lawyers ever had the document?

There is just as much if not more evidence of trump’s nefarious deeds as there is of Joe’s/Hunter’s. You will take any rumor or innuendo as proof of Biden guilt but would dismiss video evidence of trump’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

How do you know Trump or his lawyers ever had the document?

There is just as much if not more evidence of trump’s nefarious deeds as there is of Joe’s/Hunter’s. You will take any rumor or innuendo as proof of Biden guilt but would dismiss video evidence of trump’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Incorrect.

[houndawg]

What happens if Trump's lawyers can' produce the missing document?

How do you know Trump or his lawyers ever had the document?

You don't seriously think that the Saudis just handed the outgoing president's son-in-law $2,500,000,000 for nothing? Do you?

$2,500,000,000 is chump (rhymes with Trump) change for the Saudis, SG, - they would have paid twice that to get their hands on the US military's asessment of Iran's weaknesses and a battle plan for dealing with the Saudis bitter rival for regional dominance.
For a conspiracy wack who sees plots everywhere its interesting you haven't mentioned this one.

[LeadBolt]

It is one thing to cultivate relationships that can produce opportunities after leaving office as Clinton, Obama and yes Jared Cushner did.

It is another thing altogether to take money while in office for political favors in office as the Bidens have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[UNI88]

There is just as much if not more evidence of trump’s nefarious deeds as there is of Joe’s/Hunter’s. You will take any rumor or innuendo as proof of Biden guilt but would dismiss video evidence of trump’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Incorrect.

This is where you and kalm agree.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

Incorrect.

This is where you and kalm agree.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What am I agreeing with here?

[UNI88]

How do you know Trump or his lawyers ever had the document?

You don't seriously think that the Saudis just handed the outgoing president's son-in-law $2,500,000,000 for nothing? Do you?

$2,500,000,000 is chump (rhymes with Trump) change for the Saudis, SG, - they would have paid twice that to get their hands on the US military's asessment of Iran's weaknesses and a battle plan for dealing with the Saudis bitter rival for regional dominance.
For a conspiracy wack who sees plots everywhere its interesting you haven't mentioned this one.

The false god trump can do no wrong in the eyes of his worshippers. They see conspiracies everywhere except when they look in the mirror. Like most cults, they believe in the righteousness of their cause and that evil doers are out to get their idol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

It is one thing to cultivate relationships that can produce opportunities after leaving office as Clinton, Obama and yes Jared Cushner did.

It is another thing altogether to take money while in office for political favors in office as the Bidens have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not really. The bribery/grifting, leveraging campaign donations or in your case Saudi blood money didn’t just all happen after Trump left office.

[UNI88]

This is where you and kalm agree.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What am I agreeing with here?

That I’m incorrect that

There is just as much if not more evidence of trump’s nefarious deeds as there is of Joe’s/Hunter’s.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

What am I agreeing with here?

That I’m incorrect that

There is just as much if not more evidence of trump’s nefarious deeds as there is of Joe’s/Hunter’s.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Am I?

[UNI88]

That I’m incorrect that
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Am I?

You are just as sure that the Bidens’ misdeeds are less than the trumps’ as SG is of the opposite.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

Am I?

You are just as sure that the Bidens’ misdeeds are less than the trumps’ as SG is of the opposite.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because there’s overwhelming evidence provided through investigations, testimony and evidence that they are. The only people arguing otherwise are MAGA.

Reality is more important than an arbitrary center line in a two party system.