FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53454
So apointing out the shooter was a transvestite BLM supporter makes one homophobic.bobbythekidd wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 10:16 am It's almost crazy that all these mass shootings involve the same style rifle.
White, black, trans, school, house of religious worship, grocery store, concert, or night club, it's always the same rifle. It's a complete enigma.
But do go on about your homophobia.
Why did you start a thread named "Another trans mass shooter" when it's a rare occurrence?BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:01 pmSo apointing out the shooter was a transvestite BLM supporter makes one homophobic.bobbythekidd wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 10:16 am It's almost crazy that all these mass shootings involve the same style rifle.
White, black, trans, school, house of religious worship, grocery store, concert, or night club, it's always the same rifle. It's a complete enigma.
But do go on about your homophobia.
Using that same Bobby logic if, it was a MAGA shooter, (which would be front page national news) pointing that out on here would make one Conkphobic, or MAGAphobic.
Add this shooter and you bumped the percentage up a whole 0.03% to 0.14%!The data tells a different story, according to gender and criminology experts. Mass casualty shootings perpetrated by someone identifying as trans or nonbinary are rare, and in fact, those groups are far more likely to be the victims of violence.
...
While specific data on transgender and nonbinary mass shooters can be hard to isolate, available information shows that the overwhelming majority of assailants in mass shootings are cisgender males.
...
Laura Dugan, a professor of human security and sociology at Ohio State University, said the four widely cited examples out of the 3,561 shootings translates to 0.11% being perpetrated by someone who is not cisgender — a very low number relative to the number of mass shootings total.
How about because it's been two in a row, and the first ones mind was so twisted, they still won't release the manifesto.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:32 pmWhy did you start a thread named "Another trans mass shooter" when it's a rare occurrence?
FACT FOCUS: No ‘incredible rise’ in transgender shooters
Add this shooter and you bumped the percentage up a whole 0.03% to 0.14%!The data tells a different story, according to gender and criminology experts. Mass casualty shootings perpetrated by someone identifying as trans or nonbinary are rare, and in fact, those groups are far more likely to be the victims of violence.
...
While specific data on transgender and nonbinary mass shooters can be hard to isolate, available information shows that the overwhelming majority of assailants in mass shootings are cisgender males.
...
Laura Dugan, a professor of human security and sociology at Ohio State University, said the four widely cited examples out of the 3,561 shootings translates to 0.11% being perpetrated by someone who is not cisgender — a very low number relative to the number of mass shootings total.
The odds of a shooter being a straight MAGAt yahoo are significantly higher than them being trans.
There is no point so obvious that you could not miss it.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:01 pmSo apointing out the shooter was a transvestite BLM supporter makes one homophobic.bobbythekidd wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 10:16 am It's almost crazy that all these mass shootings involve the same style rifle.
White, black, trans, school, house of religious worship, grocery store, concert, or night club, it's always the same rifle. It's a complete enigma.
But do go on about your homophobia.
Using that same Bobby logic if, it was a MAGA shooter, (which would be front page national news) pointing that out on here would make one Conkphobic, or MAGAphobic.
it standsfor Armalite and there is no better tool available to the general civilian population if you want to kill as many people as possible in a short amount of time.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:07 pmOh, it takes an AR? I suppose you think that stands for Assault Rifle.
You mean a semiautomatic? Like a pistol, which happens to kill more people than any other weapon.houndawg wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:10 pmit standsfor Armalite and there is no better tool available to the general civilian population if you want to kill as many people as possible in a short amount of time.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:07 pm
Oh, it takes an AR? I suppose you think that stands for Assault Rifle.
0.14% of mass shooters are trans. Depending on how you define them, 0.6 - 1.6% of people in the US are trans/non-binary.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:51 pmHow about because it's been two in a row, and the first ones mind was so twisted, they still won't release the manifesto.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:32 pm
Why did you start a thread named "Another trans mass shooter" when it's a rare occurrence?
FACT FOCUS: No ‘incredible rise’ in transgender shooters
Add this shooter and you bumped the percentage up a whole 0.03% to 0.14%!
The odds of a shooter being a straight MAGAt yahoo are significantly higher than them being trans.
Stats are not homophobic and anyone who tries to pull that obviously cannot defend their stance.
Ha! I was talking about Bobby trying to say pointing out the last two was homophobic! But you keep up with the knee jerk reactions.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:51 pm0.14% of mass shooters are trans. Depending on how you define them, 0.6 - 1.6% of people in the US are trans/non-binary.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 2:51 pm
How about because it's been two in a row, and the first ones mind was so twisted, they still won't release the manifesto.
Stats are not homophobic and anyone who tries to pull that obviously cannot defend their stance.
Even with the recent shootings, the statistics don't like and aren't heterophobic. Trans people are significantly less likely then the general population to be mass shooters. But lets keep trying to spread these bullshit lies that trans people are mass shooters (as well as groomers and pedophiles) that someone reads about in echo chambers filled with gullible morons.
What would you call starting a thread focused on something that is such a tiny percentage of the total? Homophobic? Homoerotic? Bi-Curious? Self loathing?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 4:36 pmHa! I was talking about Bobby trying to say pointing out the last two was homophobic! But you keep up with the knee jerk reactions.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:51 pm
0.14% of mass shooters are trans. Depending on how you define them, 0.6 - 1.6% of people in the US are trans/non-binary.
Even with the recent shootings, the statistics don't like and aren't heterophobic. Trans people are significantly less likely then the general population to be mass shooters. But lets keep trying to spread these bullshit lies that trans people are mass shooters (as well as groomers and pedophiles) that someone reads about in echo chambers filled with gullible morons.
How about you really dig in and tell us just who is commiting the most mass shootings. That'll be an eye opener because your own linked articles states it's really hard to come up with numbers.
What are the facts? That's what matters.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 4:52 pmWhat would you call starting a thread focused on something that is such a tiny percentage of the total? Homophobic? Homoerotic? Bi-Curious? Self loathing?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 4:36 pm
Ha! I was talking about Bobby trying to say pointing out the last two was homophobic! But you keep up with the knee jerk reactions.
How about you really dig in and tell us just who is commiting the most mass shootings. That'll be an eye opener because your own linked articles states it's really hard to come up with numbers.
BDKaren professes not to care about the LGBTQ+ community but seems to be infatuated with them. It's almost like he looks for things he can post that will disparage them. He does the same for blacks and other minorities. Is he being informative or bigoted?
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:24 pmYou mean a semiautomatic? Like a pistol, which happens to kill more people than any other weapon.
houndawg wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 6:20 pmSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:24 pm
You mean a semiautomatic? Like a pistol, which happens to kill more people than any other weapon.
That's gonna leave a mark.
I think he was talking about mass shootings.
Two in a row? Are you intentionally misrepresenting reality or are you ignorant?
Two in a row meaning that up until this year, I'd never heard of a trans shooter, now there have been two in a row.bobbythekidd wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:15 amTwo in a row? Are you intentionally misrepresenting reality or are you ignorant?
The have been 24 mass shootings in the last 4 days alone. There is no way you can come up with a "two in a row" argument.
https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/repo ... s-shooting
IIRC it’s something like 4 victims involved.
very nice, off the subject as usual - I'm not talking about the most commonly used , I'm talking about the best tool commonly available...Check out the pics of classrooms shot up with a gun vs those shot up with an AR-15.
