Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 4:33 pm

UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 4:29 pm

It isn't as bad, it's worse. Appointing an attorney, who might be under qualified but is still an attorney, to lead a trial isn't as bad as arranging for the appointment of your completely and utterly unqualified daughter-in-law to chair the RNC so that she can prioritize using funds to pay your yuge legal bills and get you reelected while underfunding other important campaigns.

I have no clue

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:24 pm

UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:16 pm

I know what the RNC does, I have a rough outline of lara trump's experience and I think I have a pretty good understanding of my own experience. I'm underqualified for the RNC job but not nearly as unqualified as lara trump is.

MAQA yahoos like to mock kamala harris for fvcking her way to where she is; if lara trump geets the RNC Chair job then she fvcked her way to it.

If you're going to defend my criticism of lara trump I expect you to defend kamala harris just as vociferously or I'm going to continue to call out your and others hypocrisy.

You don't know shit StUni. Stop trying to act like you know anything more than reading disparaging articles from Yahoo or the Atlantic. Give us the job duties chief.

As to your stupid second statement. Get TDS therapy.

houndawg wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 7:09 am

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:24 pm

You don't know shit StUni. Stop trying to act like you know anything more than reading disparaging articles from Yahoo or the Atlantic. Give us the job duties chief.

As to your stupid second statement. Get TDS therapy.

Your traditional yapping has taken on a chihuaua-like brittle edge as Trump keeps losing his appeals to evade justice and women keep slapping the shit out of him in court - (especially black women - you know that really burns his ass) . And it seems to raising your blood pressure to a possibly-unhealthy level. I would advise you to be careful about these fits of temper but I'm sure they covered it in med school.

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:21 am

UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:16 pm
I know what the RNC does, I have a rough outline of lara trump's experience and I think I have a pretty good understanding of my own experience. I'm underqualified for the RNC job but not nearly as unqualified as lara trump is.

MAQA yahoos like to mock kamala harris for fvcking her way to where she is; if lara trump geets the RNC Chair job then she fvcked her way to it.

If you're going to defend my criticism of lara trump I expect you to defend kamala harris just as vociferously or I'm going to continue to call out your and others hypocrisy.

What highly powerful, way older, married man is Lara Trump having an affair with who is appointing her to the RNC chair? Do tell..

UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:14 am

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:21 am
What highly powerful, way older, married man is Lara Trump having an affair with who is appointing her to the RNC chair? Do tell..

15 yards and loss of down - incessant nitpicking.
Getting a job because of who you're fvcking is getting a job because of who you're fvcking. Doesn't matter the age difference or whether a ring is involved.

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:33 am

UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:14 am
15 yards and loss of down - incessant nitpicking.
Getting a job because of who you're fvcking is getting a job because of who you're fvcking. Doesn't matter the age difference or whether a ring is involved.

So a woman getting her start in politics via her husband, who wasn‘t involved in politics at the time the they were dating & got married (2008-2014) is the same as a woman getting her start in politics by having an affair with a married man more than twice her age at the time and who happened at the time to be Speaker of the House of the most populated state in the country. Yeah, you‘ve officially lost it..

UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:44 am

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 11:33 am
So a woman getting her start in politics via her husband, who wasn‘t involved in politics at the time the they were dating & got married (2008-2014) is the same as a woman getting her start in politics by having an affair with a married man more than twice her age at the time and who happened at the time to be Speaker of the House of the most populated state in the country. Yeah, you‘ve officially lost it..

Maybe lara trump was looking ahead. She didn't marry eric because he was well endowed physically, she married him because he was well endowed financially.

The hypocrisy of MAQA yahoos upset over fani willis' favoritism but fine with trump wanting to get lara trump appointed to a position for which she is woefully unqualified would be funny if they weren't so certain that trump's self-serving nepotism (and anything trump does) is okay.

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:13 pm Oof. Houndie, Klamala and StUni hardest hit today. Their version of justice is to use two liars to get Trump, the former liar in chief.

Sad.

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:42 pm

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:13 pm Oof. Houndie, Klamala and StUni hardest hit today. Their version of justice is to use two liars to get Trump, the former liar in chief.

Sad.

I don't support fani. If she did something wrong she should be investigated and charged just like trump. I have no problem with their replacing her with a competent attorney who will pursue justice in this case.

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:13 pm Oof. Houndie, Klamala and StUni hardest hit today. Their version of justice is to use two liars to get Trump.

Sad.

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:58 pm

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:42 pm
I don't support fani. If she did something wrong she should be investigated and charged just like trump. I have no problem with their replacing her with a competent attorney who will pursue justice in this case.

Is it really justice though? Two documented liars on a politically motivated case. They'd never lie about Trump or stretch the law though.

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 6:49 pm

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:58 pm

Is it really justice though? Two documented liars on a politically motivated case. They'd never lie about Trump or stretch the law though.

How are they stretching the law?

They're prosecuting the case. They don't get to just make up shit in court and the judge lets them get away with it (despite trump's best attempts in other trials). If they do, the defense attorneys object and if they're overruled the defense can use it on appeal.

If it is found that their affair created a conflict of interest then they should be removed and a new district attorney assigned.

If I'm the judge on this (or another trump) case then I'm dotting all my I's and crossing all my T's so that I don't give an appeals or Supreme Court reasons to overturn the ruling.

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:03 pm

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 6:49 pm

How are they stretching the law?

They're prosecuting the case. They don't get to just make up shit in court and the judge lets them get away with it (despite trump's best attempts in other trials). If they do, the defense attorneys object and if they're overruled the defense can use it on appeal.

If it is found that their affair created a conflict of interest then they should be removed and a new district attorney assigned.

If I'm the judge on this (or another trump) case then I'm dotting all my I's and crossing all my T's so that I don't give an appeals or Supreme Court reasons to overturn the ruling.

You're trusting a pair of philandering liars with being honest? Holy fuck. Move away, you've gone Antifa level insane.

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:26 pm

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:03 pm

You're trusting a pair of philandering liars with being honest? Holy fuck. Move away, you've gone Antifa level insane.

First, why not? You trust a philandering liar to put the people's interests before his own while he fights the deep state.

Second, I don't trust them. I trust the system. It fails occasionally but it's a damn good system, better than anything the trump and his cronies could replace it with.

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:03 pm

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 6:49 pm

How are they stretching the law?

They're prosecuting the case. They don't get to just make up shit in court and the judge lets them get away with it (despite trump's best attempts in other trials). If they do, the defense attorneys object and if they're overruled the defense can use it on appeal.

If it is found that their affair created a conflict of interest then they should be removed and a new district attorney assigned.

If I'm the judge on this (or another trump) case then I'm dotting all my I's and crossing all my T's so that I don't give an appeals or Supreme Court reasons to overturn the ruling.

You're trusting a pair of philandering liars with being honest? Holy fuck. Move away, you've gone Antifa level insane.

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 8:21 am

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:26 pm

First, why not? You trust a philandering liar to put the people's interests before his own while he fights the deep state.

Second, I don't trust them. I trust the system. It fails occasionally but it's a damn good system, better than anything the trump and his cronies could replace it with.

Your first claim is a non sequitur. Trump's interests, which you have no clue over, have nothing to do with the fair application of justice. You're also saying that it's okay to fuck people over because you don't personally like them.

Your second claim is omitting the fact that the system is operated by liars like Fani, and if anything like you, people willing to fuck someone over because they don't like them. The "system" doesn't apply any action, it's the people.

Tell you what. I'll start searching for a qualified doctor to perform a TDSectomy on you.

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:26 pm

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:03 pm

You're trusting a pair of philandering liars with being honest? Holy fuck. Move away, you've gone Antifa level insane.

First, why not? You trust a philandering liar to put the people's interests before his own while he fights the deep state.

Second, I don't trust them. I trust the system. It fails occasionally but it's a damn good system, better than anything the trump and his cronies could replace it with.

Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:15 am

UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:26 pm

First, why not? You trust a philandering liar to put the people's interests before his own while he fights the deep state.

Second, I don't trust them. I trust the system. It fails occasionally but it's a damn good system, better than anything the trump and his cronies could replace it with.

The TDS infection your brain has with everything Trump has exposed you as extremely biased, nothing like the middleman you pretend to be

Fani is lying fraud and you love her

kalm wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:35 am

Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:15 am

The TDS infection your brain has with everything Trump has exposed you as extremely biased, nothing like the middleman you pretend to be

Fani is lying fraud and you love her

“Find me 11,780 votes.”

kalm wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:35 am

Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:15 am

The TDS infection your brain has with everything Trump has exposed you as extremely biased, nothing like the middleman you pretend to be

Fani is lying fraud and you love her

“Find me 11,780 votes.”

houndawg wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:06 am

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 8:21 am

Your first claim is a non sequitur. Trump's interests, which you have no clue over, have nothing to do with the fair application of justice. You're also saying that it's okay to fuck people over because you don't personally like them.

Your second claim is omitting the fact that the system is operated by liars like Fani, and if anything like you, people willing to fuck someone over because they don't like them. The "system" doesn't apply any action, it's the people.

Tell you what. I'll start searching for a qualified doctor to perform a TDSectomy on you.

Exactly.

SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 10:16 am

kalm wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 9:35 am

“Find me 11,780 votes.”

Let the people investigate the 150k ballots they have asked to see.