2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28071
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
Don’t have a 2024 thread. Not a ruling, but Justice Diversity Hire strikes again.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23337
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
they should give the bump stocks away free at Modern Country concerts, in a month 50% of the semi-auto rifles in the nation would have cooked barrels.
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28071
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
Lol no they wouldn’t. Not too many dumbasses that would blow through enough rounds in a brief enough period to cook the barrels.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23337
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
wrong.
Plenty of dumbasses and the barrels are lighter in the civilian models.
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 20234
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
Even the Supreme Court’s Conservatives Are Fed Up With the Garbage Coming Out of the 5th Circuit
How would Doughty and others react if trump were reelected in 2024 and liberals turned the tables, using his rulings to keep the trump administration from trying to influence FaceBook and other social media providers?
Are clowns like Doughty the reason that people think we can't trust any judge who doesn't think like they do?Doughty, it turns out, grievously butchered the record to reach his conclusion. An exhaustive analysis by Mike Masnick proves that Doughty consistently misrepresented testimony and other evidence in the record to construct a conspiracy theory with zero basis in reality. He distorted emails and other exchanges to make them look coercive when they were nothing of the sort, cherry-picking and rearranging quotations to put them in a censorious light. Yet the hard-right U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, where law goes to die, affirmed Doughty’s conclusions and upheld much of his injunction (while narrowing it in part). That move sent the administration racing to the Supreme Court for an emergency stay, which it granted in October, over the dissents of Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. Monday’s arguments confirmed that a majority is prepared to side with Biden on the merits.
The justices did not sound happy to have the case before them. Justice Sonia Sotomayor scolded Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin Aguiñaga (a former Alito clerk) for his lack of candor. “I have such a problem with your brief,” she told him. “You omit information that changes the context of some of your claims. You attribute things to people who it didn’t happen to.” Aguiñaga was unable to defend Doughty’s more extreme deceptions. So he had to fall back on what Justice Elena Kagan called an “extremely expansive” argument: the notion that “encouraging people to suppress their own speech” violates the First Amendment, even if it isn’t coercive. Kagan drew upon her past work in the executive branch to explain that, actually, government officials do this all the time. “I’ve had some experience encouraging press to suppress their own speech,” Kagan told Aguiñaga. Example: “You just wrote a bad editorial. Here are the five reasons you shouldn’t write another one.” Is that really unconstitutional?
How would Doughty and others react if trump were reelected in 2024 and liberals turned the tables, using his rulings to keep the trump administration from trying to influence FaceBook and other social media providers?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23337
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
Not SCOTUS but....Aileen Cannon - is she deliberately trying to get herself removed from the case or is she a true believer?UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:55 pm Even the Supreme Court’s Conservatives Are Fed Up With the Garbage Coming Out of the 5th Circuit
Are clowns like Doughty the reason that people think we can't trust any judge who doesn't think like they do?Doughty, it turns out, grievously butchered the record to reach his conclusion. An exhaustive analysis by Mike Masnick proves that Doughty consistently misrepresented testimony and other evidence in the record to construct a conspiracy theory with zero basis in reality. He distorted emails and other exchanges to make them look coercive when they were nothing of the sort, cherry-picking and rearranging quotations to put them in a censorious light. Yet the hard-right U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, where law goes to die, affirmed Doughty’s conclusions and upheld much of his injunction (while narrowing it in part). That move sent the administration racing to the Supreme Court for an emergency stay, which it granted in October, over the dissents of Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. Monday’s arguments confirmed that a majority is prepared to side with Biden on the merits.
The justices did not sound happy to have the case before them. Justice Sonia Sotomayor scolded Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin Aguiñaga (a former Alito clerk) for his lack of candor. “I have such a problem with your brief,” she told him. “You omit information that changes the context of some of your claims. You attribute things to people who it didn’t happen to.” Aguiñaga was unable to defend Doughty’s more extreme deceptions. So he had to fall back on what Justice Elena Kagan called an “extremely expansive” argument: the notion that “encouraging people to suppress their own speech” violates the First Amendment, even if it isn’t coercive. Kagan drew upon her past work in the executive branch to explain that, actually, government officials do this all the time. “I’ve had some experience encouraging press to suppress their own speech,” Kagan told Aguiñaga. Example: “You just wrote a bad editorial. Here are the five reasons you shouldn’t write another one.” Is that really unconstitutional?
How would Doughty and others react if trump were reelected in 2024 and liberals turned the tables, using his rulings to keep the trump administration from trying to influence FaceBook and other social media providers?
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59556
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
I’ve learned over the years not get all bent about oral arguments and questions asked by judges. It’s the legal version of campaign horserace.
But hot damn there are some dumb, wildly hypocritical right wing partisan hack judges on the SCOTUS.
But hot damn there are some dumb, wildly hypocritical right wing partisan hack judges on the SCOTUS.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23337
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
Just have BATF expand the FFL category to include high-capacity semi-autos, a simple solution thay infringes on nobody
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28071
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
And no matter how many times you repeat it, you’re still wrong.
A simpler solition. Disband the ATF. If you don’t like high capacity semi autos, don’t buy one. If you do like them, buy lots. After all, its a free country
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23337
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
False dichotomy, bro.
I'm a big fan of them personally - the problem is being downrange from one when downrange means a classroom/schoolyard or a country music show.
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28071
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
And if current gun and mental health laws were enforced, most of those shootings wouldn’t have happend.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23337
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
But we didn't fund adequately because its "too expensive" and makes republicans cry.
Best thing to do to force some action is to show the photos from Uvalde - show the folks at home what an AR does to a 60lb kid.
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28071
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28071
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
At very close range, a much bigger, slower JHP round from a handgun (semi auto or revolver) would do worse. Or from a 12 gauge shooting 00 buck..
About 90% of all lethal shootings are done with handguns. Only about 10% longguns, and those black and scary looking MRSs are only about 1/3 of that. But that’s what gets all the attention of all the anti gun whiney little bitches..
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 28071
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
As I said last year:
-It wouldn’t pass the current Congress . Not even remotely close.
-It wouldn’t pass the current courts. Not even remotely close.
ATF only handles a few hundred thousand FFL and tax stamps application packets per year. And the wait times on those is like 6 months. If the ATF had to do an FFL packet for the tens of millions of semi auto owners and a tax stamp packet for bundreds of millions of semi autos (the tax stamp is per gun, suppressor, etc), it would take them DECADES to process.
Then the ATF couldn’t handle the conpliance checks on 50 million or ao new FFL/tax stamp holders. Better redirect those 600k new ITS agents to the ATF.
ZERO %. chance of happening in our lifetimes.
But even if your fantasy could somehow come true, tens of millions of gun owners would ignore it. Govt couldn’t do anything about mass non compliance.
And it would disproportionately affect the 2A rights of poor and minority people. Why are you against poor people and racist?
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions...But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23337
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
you mad bro?:lol:
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky
-
- Level5
- Posts: 23337
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: 2024 SCOTUS Rulings Thread
Best tool available to a civilian who needs to kill a lot of people in a short time unless you have access to explosivesBDKJMU wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:36 amAt very close range, a much bigger, slower JHP round from a handgun (semi auto or revolver) would do worse. Or from a 12 gauge shooting 00 buck..
About 90% of all lethal shootings are done with handguns. Only about 10% longguns, and those black and scary looking MRSs are only about 1/3 of that. But that’s what gets all the attention of all the anti gun whiney little bitches..
The best way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of opinion but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - Noam Chomsky