Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Past time to start this thread ...

Why?

How is an opinion a gaffe?

There is no end to your partisan hack status is there?

UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:09 pm

Donks through this Spring: Biden is lucid amd sharp as a tack. I support his candidacy.

Donks the last 4 weeks: Biden needs to go. Mentally he’s not there anymore..

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:14 pm

UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:09 pm

Donks through this Spring: Biden is lucid amd sharp as a tack. I support his candidacy.

Donks the last 4 weeks: Biden needs to go. Mentally he’s not there anymore..

I'm missing how that's a JD Vance/James Hamel/James Donald Bowman gaffe or verbal bungle.

Bobcat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:12 pm How is an opinion a gaffe?

There is no end to your partisan hack status is there?

What Vance said was 8 years ago. Donks literally flip flopped overnight on Biden..

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:17 pm

Bobcat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:12 pm How is an opinion a gaffe?

There is no end to your partisan hack status is there?

What Vance said was 8 years ago. Donks literally flip flopped overnight on Biden..

It's applicable, just doesn't fit in this thread.

Bobcat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:12 pm How are two changing opinions a gaffe?

There is no end to your partisan hack status is there?

FYP

Bobqat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:12 pm How is an opinion a gaffe?

There is no end to your partisan hack status is there?

I can't stand trump or biden. I mock them both. You get upset when I mock trump and his MAQA yahoos like vance/hamel/bowman but not when I mock biden. Who's the partisan hack?

UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:50 pm

Bobqat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:12 pm How is an opinion a gaffe?

There is no end to your partisan hack status is there?

I can't stand trump or biden. I mock them both, but 95% of my mockery is directed at Trump because of my TDS.

FIFY

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 4:22 pm

UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:50 pm
I can't stand trump or biden. I mock them both, but 80% of my current mockery is directed at trump because of his MAQA yahoo cult's tDS Type II.

FIFY

Back atcha.

UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 2:53 pm

the great ones make it look easy.......(this guy went to Yale Law School? Seriously?)

UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 4:27 pm

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 4:22 pm
FIFY

Back atcha.

Yeah, I noticed right after my post you posted a bunch of anti Biden memes & pro Trump memes. Ok, maybe you’re at 90/10.

BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 10:13 am

UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 4:27 pm
Back atcha.

Yeah, I noticed right after my post you posted a bunch of anti Biden memes & pro Trump memes. Ok, maybe you’re at 90/10.

And I'm 80/20, 90/10 or whatever because while the biden supporters on here know that he (or harris) are crappy candidates, the MAQA yahoos defend trump like he's the 2nd coming who can do no wrong and is being persecuted by the Romans. Their hypocrisy/double standard deserves to be mocked relentlessly.

The left has been after Trump for 9 years lying, cheating and attempting to kill him. They have failed at every turn Russia was a lie its proven just like all the other BS they tried. If there was ever anything substantive I would love to hear it and would hold him accountable for it but the left has nothing but lies and deceit

Bobsquat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 10:40 am The left has been after Trump for 9 years lying, cheating and attempting to kill him. They have failed at every turn Russia was a lie its proven just like all the other BS they tried. If there was ever anything substantive I would love to hear it and would hold him accountable for it but the left has nothing but lies and deceit

Trying to beat him at his own game is a bold move.

To provide some but not all of the substance (not that you won't just summarily dismiss it):

• there is evidence of communication between trump's associates and russia, just not enough to prove collusion. It's similar to the proof about biden benefiting from hunter's exploits in that regard.
• there is video of him firing up the crowd that later stormed the Capital. In addition to telling the mob that "if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore", he mixed in statements like "peacefully and patriotically" to reduce his liability.
• It's proven that the FBI had to enforce a subpoena to get around his attempts to obstruct the return of classified documents.
• There are recordings of at least one call to state officials where he attempted to bully them into "finding" votes or not certifying results.
• There is proof of his staff arranging for slates of fraudulent electors.
• It's know that he focused his election interference only on battleground states that he lost. If he was acting in a Presidential capacity (and not as a candidate) he would have asked for reviews of all battleground states including North Carolina.

See, you have nothing but speculation and political narratives.

To provide some but not all of the substance (not that you won't just summarily dismiss it):

Bobcat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:11 am See, you have nothing but speculation and political narratives.

kalm wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:25 am

To provide some but not all of the substance (not that you won't just summarily dismiss it):

Bobsquat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:11 am See, you have nothing but speculation and political narratives.

Any substance that I disagree with is "speculation and political narratives" while any "speculation and political narrative" that I agree with is substantive.

Tim Walz teaching JD Vance about small towns is thing of beauty.

Vance is a total fraud and bad strategic choice for Trump.

I guess he knows what project 2025 is ...

What? Wait…What?

And to a round of applause.

Bobcat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:11 am See, you have nothing but speculation and political narratives.

Nobody from his first cabinet wants to be in his second cabinet.

Speculate that for a us, Bobcant.