2025 SCOTUS Decisions
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:01 pm
Tik Tok ban upheld. Doesn’t fall across the usual ideological lines, as have bipartisan conks and donks for the ban, and bipartisan conks and donks against it.
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53920
And“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
...
The Constitution gives the House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a slim majority, the power to impeach a judge with a simple majority vote. But, like a presidential impeachment, any removal requires a vote from a two-thirds majority from the Senate.
...
“What we are seeing is an attempt by one branch of government to intimidate another branch from performing its constitutional duty. It is a direct threat to judicial independence,” Marin Levy, a Duke University School of Law professor who specializes in the federal courts, said in an email.
Only one day earlier, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “I have not heard the president talk about impeaching judges.”
So how did the other 8 justices vote in this case?UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:06 pm Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans
And“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
...
The Constitution gives the House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a slim majority, the power to impeach a judge with a simple majority vote. But, like a presidential impeachment, any removal requires a vote from a two-thirds majority from the Senate.
...
“What we are seeing is an attempt by one branch of government to intimidate another branch from performing its constitutional duty. It is a direct threat to judicial independence,” Marin Levy, a Duke University School of Law professor who specializes in the federal courts, said in an email.
Only one day earlier, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “I have not heard the president talk about impeaching judges.”on karoline leavitt's statement. Does she not read her boss' Lie Social posts?
What case? This was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States commenting about the Radical Right Lunatics calling for the impeachment of judges.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 4:33 pmSo how did the other 8 justices vote in this case?UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:06 pm Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans
Andon carolyn leavitt's statement. Does she not read her boss' Lie Social posts?
This is the ‘2025 SCOTUS Decisions’ thread.
1) It wasn't a "decision" but it was "the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States commenting about the Radical Right Lunatics calling for the impeachment of judges."