USAID
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:56 am
Why is it funding the BBC, AP and Politico?
(Puke now because the spin on this will make you black out)
(Puke now because the spin on this will make you black out)
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53930
$520 million for ESG consultants in Africa
$45 million for DEI scholarships in Burma
$47 thousand for a trans opera in Columbia
$32 thousand for a transgender comic book in Peru
$3.25 million dollars funding the British Broadcasting Corporation media.
$1.5 million for DEI in Serbia workplaces
$70 thousand for a DEI musical production in Ireland.
$20 million for a Sesame Street in Iraq
$56 million to boost tourism in Egypt & Tunisia
$27 million to the George Soros prosecutor fund
$40 million to build schools in Jordan
$11 million to tell Vietnam to stop burning trash
$27 million for reintegration gift bags for deported Central Americans
$2.5 million for electric vehicles for Vietnam
$3.7 billion for the Taliban
$2 billion for Palestinians
$3.4 billion for Yemen as part of $8 billion for Iranian regime
$3.3 billion for Somalia
$2 million for sex changes and "LGBT activism" in Guatemala
$6 million to fund tourism in Egypt
Hundreds of thousands of dollars for a non-profit linked to designated terrorist organizations — even AFTER an inspector general launched an investigation
$Millions to EcoHealth Alliance — which was involved in research at the Wuhan lab
Hundreds of thousands of meals that went to al Qaeda-affiliated fighters in Syria
Funding to print "personalized" contraceptives birth control devices in developing countries
Hundreds of millions of dollars to fund "irrigation canals, farming equipment, and even fertilizer used to support the unprecedented poppy cultivation and heroin production in Afghanistan," benefiting the Taliban
$100 billion dollars in COVID payments was stolen by professional foreign fraud rings?
$2 million dollars for Moroccan pottery classes
$300 million to build diesel fueled power plants in Afghanistan but they couldn’t use them because diesel was too expensive
$200 million to Afghanistan to build a dam they didn’t use because it was too unsafe
$250 million to Afghanistan to build a road that was never used
$900 million to Syrians for humanitarian aid but someone messed up and it went to Al Queda
$1 million for bat research in Wuhan, China
USAID funded fashion week in Paris
USAID has been funding the invasion of our country through NGO’s
Well for starters, it’s not funding Politico. Should we check out the rest?
30+ million and counting and Politico sent out an email notifying employees they were not getting paid. Check out their scathing honorable piece on the Hunter Biden laptop story! Politico literally interfered with a US election and Democrats paid them to do it!
Gullible cult members lapping up lies and misinformation.Becker and Johnson’s claims are false. The only payments received by Politico LLC from USAID were for two subscriptions to E&E—an energy and environment publication it produces—totaling $44,000 over two years.
According to USAspending.gov, an official source for U.S. government expenditure data—and the resource used by Becker in his post—Politico received $8.2 million in total payments from government departments and agencies between fiscal year 2016 and fiscal year 2025. However, only $44,000 of this total came from USAID.
In September 2023, a staff assistant for the Center for Environment, Energy, and Infrastructure—part of USAID’s Bureau for Development, Democracy, and Innovation—purchased a subscription to E&E for $20,000. According to E&E, prices for its professional subscription packages typically start in the upper four-figure range and vary based on how many users have access to a subscription. Another subscription to E&E was purchased in September 2024 for $24,000 by the Center for Climate Positive Development—an office within USAID’s Bureau for Resilience and Food Security.
Funds received by Politico LLC from other government agencies also came mostly from subscriptions to E&E, or for the company’s policy intelligence platform, Politico Pro. The largest spenders have been the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Department of the Interior (DOI), and Department of Energy (DOE).
$100….donated to championshipsubdivision.com.Bobcat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pm Hey do you clowns remember when Politico leaked the Dobbs decision and you guys tried to kill Supreme Court Justices?
I do
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/0 ... n-00029473
I would bet each of you $100 dollars that soon we will find out that USAID has ties to the assassination attempts on Trump. Its inevitable
Your terms are not acceptable.kalm wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:05 pm$100….donated to championshipsubdivision.com.Bobcat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pm Hey do you clowns remember when Politico leaked the Dobbs decision and you guys tried to kill Supreme Court Justices?
I do
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/0 ... n-00029473
I would bet each of you $100 dollars that soon we will find out that USAID has ties to the assassination attempts on Trump. Its inevitable
Story must be verified media outlets like AP, Reuters, NYT, WaPo, Guardian.
You’re on.
Elon Musk wants to cut government spending. Tesla and SpaceX benefit from itTesla: Musk's automotive and energy company, known for its pioneering electric vehicles and its battery storage innovations, has received $41.9 million in federal contracts since 2008.
...
SpaceX: The tech billionaire's aerospace company has benefited from nearly $19.8 billion in federal contracts since 2008.
Show us all where that info was buried and hidden, show us where politicians on boths sides funded Musk illegally.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:12 pm Speaking of potential fraud ...
Elon Musk wants to cut government spending. Tesla and SpaceX benefit from itTesla: Musk's automotive and energy company, known for its pioneering electric vehicles and its battery storage innovations, has received $41.9 million in federal contracts since 2008.
...
SpaceX: The tech billionaire's aerospace company has benefited from nearly $19.8 billion in federal contracts since 2008.
I don't think either was fraudulent. Believing the propaganda and bitching about some companies getting paid by the government and while saying nothing about others is hypocritical.BobQat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:32 pmShow us all where that info was buried and hidden, show us where politicians on boths sides funded Musk illegally.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:12 pm Speaking of potential fraud ...
Elon Musk wants to cut government spending. Tesla and SpaceX benefit from it
Ill save you, Politico and the NYT the time. Its not fraud, your panic speaks volumes.
Musk had to produce a product. Politico peddled misinformation you gobbled up.
Speaking of gullible cult members lapping up lies and misinformation ...SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:54 pmMusk had to produce a product. Politico peddled misinformation you gobbled up.
Big difference.![]()
You are consistent in applying a double standard, I'll give you that.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:43 pm Claims That Politico Received USAID Funds Are False
Gullible cult members lapping up lies and misinformation.Becker and Johnson’s claims are false. The only payments received by Politico LLC from USAID were for two subscriptions to E&E—an energy and environment publication it produces—totaling $44,000 over two years.
According to USAspending.gov, an official source for U.S. government expenditure data—and the resource used by Becker in his post—Politico received $8.2 million in total payments from government departments and agencies between fiscal year 2016 and fiscal year 2025. However, only $44,000 of this total came from USAID.
In September 2023, a staff assistant for the Center for Environment, Energy, and Infrastructure—part of USAID’s Bureau for Development, Democracy, and Innovation—purchased a subscription to E&E for $20,000. According to E&E, prices for its professional subscription packages typically start in the upper four-figure range and vary based on how many users have access to a subscription. Another subscription to E&E was purchased in September 2024 for $24,000 by the Center for Climate Positive Development—an office within USAID’s Bureau for Resilience and Food Security.
Funds received by Politico LLC from other government agencies also came mostly from subscriptions to E&E, or for the company’s policy intelligence platform, Politico Pro. The largest spenders have been the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Department of the Interior (DOI), and Department of Energy (DOE).
UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 4:06 pmSpeaking of gullible cult members lapping up lies and misinformation ...SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:54 pm
Musk had to produce a product. Politico peddled misinformation you gobbled up.
Big difference.![]()
Information is as much of a product as carbon credits.
trump and his MAQA yahoo minions peddle misinformation and you say nothing ...
You are consistent in applying a double standard, I'll give you that.UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:43 pm Claims That Politico Received USAID Funds Are False
Gullible cult members lapping up lies and misinformation.
Did you fall and hit your head? Have you been hospitalized? Your ability to reason appears to be severely impacted by an injury, stroke, or similar.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 4:28 pmUNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 4:06 pm
Speaking of gullible cult members lapping up lies and misinformation ...
Information is as much of a product as carbon credits.
trump and his MAQA yahoo minions peddle misinformation and you say nothing ...
You are consistent in applying a double standard, I'll give you that.TDS so raging you can't even think straight. How exactly does you quoting yourself change the fact Musk got contracts to produce actual physical products that benefit millions?
I suggest you check into a mental hospital, because it's going to be a LOOONG head-splody four years for you, Mr nutjob.