Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

"John McCain could not have picked a better running mate than Sarah Palin."
- Baldy, travelinman67, AZGrizFan, John St. Wronge, wildcat ryan, bulldog10jw - 2008

The REALLY funny part about that post is that only ONE of those people actually SAID that. But, that's the typical donk spin. Take a fact, and spin it wildly to fit your sick, twisted view of the world.

AZGrizFan wrote:The REALLY funny part about that post is that only ONE of those people actually SAID that. But, that's the typical donk spin. Take a fact, and spin it wildly to fit your sick, twisted view of the world.

Not letting you get away with that one, Z. Please paint for us a picture of the left's "sick, twisted view of the world"......?

Is it the peace thing that got you?




Rolling Conks like so many bag ladies......

Cap'n Cat wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:The REALLY funny part about that post is that only ONE of those people actually SAID that. But, that's the typical donk spin. Take a fact, and spin it wildly to fit your sick, twisted view of the world.

Not letting you get away with that one, Z. Please paint for us a picture of the left's "sick, twisted view of the world"......?

Is it the peace thing that got you?




Rolling Conks like so many bag ladies......

I don't need to paint the picture. You paint it FOR me every single day.

Palin/Prejean 2012

Wedgebuster wrote:Palin/Prejean 2012

Punch the Pageant Ticket in 2012!

Damn it...who used all the ???

We're just about out, and I can't find Chris to order some more...

Cap'n Cat wrote:"John McCain could not have picked a better running mate than Sarah Palin."
- Baldy, travelinman67, AZGrizFan, John St. Wronge, wildcat ryan, bulldog10jw - 2008

...and the numbers backed it up...

69% of GOP Voters Say Palin Helped McCain

Friday, November 07, 2008

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... ped_mccain

Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Republican voters say Alaska Governor Sarah Palin helped John McCain’s bid for the presidency, even as news reports surface that some McCain staffers think she was a liability.

Only 20% of GOP voters say Palin hurt the party’s ticket, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Six percent (6%) say she had no impact, and five percent (5%) are undecided.

Ninety-one percent (91%) of Republicans have a favorable view of Palin, including 65% who say their view is Very Favorable. Only eight percent (8%) have an unfavorable view of her, including three percent (3%) Very Unfavorable.

When asked to choose among some of the GOP’s top names for their choice for the party’s 2012 presidential nominee, 64% say Palin. The next closest contenders are two former governors and unsuccessful challengers for the presidential nomination this year -- Mike Huckabee of Arkansas with 12% support and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts with 11%.

That's the funny thing. The fact that they lost does NOT make the statement incorrect.

69% of GOP Voters Say Palin Helped McCain...

ROFL... the same number still swear that Iraq was behind 9-11...

and if she "helped"... by God I'd hate to see what "hurt" woulda led to at the polls... because that was a pretty serious whuppin'.

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:69% of GOP Voters Say Palin Helped McCain...

ROFL... the same number still swear that Iraq was behind 9-11...

and if she "helped"... by God I'd hate to see what "hurt" woulda led to at the polls... because that was a pretty serious whuppin'.

A "...serious whuppin'", huh...

Nixon v McGovern - MOV 23.2%
Carter v Ford - MOV 2.1%
Reagan v Carter - MOV 9.7%
Reagan v Mondale - MOV 18.2%
Bush v Dukakis - MOV 7.8%
Clinton v Bush - MOV 5.6%
Clinton v Dole - MOV 8.5%
Bush v Gore - MOV -0.5%
Bush v Kerry - MOV 2.4%
Obama - McCain - MOV 7.3%

Dude...when 78% of all the MSM news during an election favors your candidate, and your own party's controlled Congress has been funding a national voter registration crime syndicate to cherry pick voters for your party...

...and you only win by 7.3% after replacing the opponent's low-favorable rating President...

...you shouldn't be patting yourself on the back too hard...

travelinman67 wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:"John McCain could not have picked a better running mate than Sarah Palin."
- Baldy, travelinman67, AZGrizFan, John St. Wronge, wildcat ryan, bulldog10jw - 2008

...and the numbers backed it up...

69% of GOP Voters Say Palin Helped McCain

Tman, a better poll would be what independents thought of Palin's impact on the ticket? McCain wasn't going to win the election by carrying just the Republican base, he needed to appeal to the people in the middle. Did Palin help, hurt or have no impact on that effort?

I just got done reading Time's 100 influen. people. Palin made the list and that dude Ann Coulter wrote up the column. He swears up and down that Palin helped close the margin. But that guys an asshat.

Benne wrote:I just got done reading Time's 100 influen. people. Palin made the list and that dude Ann Coulter wrote up the column. He swears up and down that Palin helped close the margin. But that guys an asshat.

The election had already been over for two years before Palin was dragged up out of the mud, so she didn't hurt McCain, but she didn't change anyone's mind with the exception of Tina Fay and some political cartoonists. She probably increased turnout slightly among the wack job wing of the Party.

Picking Palin was the political equivalent of UNI's last play against Richmond in the semi's last year. With no better results.

Tman...is it a big surprise a gun-totin'-commie-hatin'-large-breasted-god-fearin'-anti-abortion-pro-God-pork-project-lovin'-governor-of-a-strong-red-state was able to solidify the Republican base in an election against a liberal black guy?

Appaholic wrote:Tman...is it a big surprise a gun-totin'-commie-hatin'-large-breasted-god-fearin'-anti-abortion-pro-God-pork-project-lovin'-governor-of-a-strong-red-state was able to solidify the Republican base in an election against a liberal black guy?

I'm surprised at how small the "base" is given the amount of noise they produce.

houndawg wrote:

Appaholic wrote:Tman...is it a big surprise a gun-totin'-commie-hatin'-large-breasted-god-fearin'-anti-abortion-pro-God-pork-project-lovin'-governor-of-a-strong-red-state was able to solidify the Republican base in an election against a liberal black guy?

I'm surprised at how small the "base" is given the amount of noise they produce.

Remind me of a chihuahua.....

AZGrizFan wrote:That's the funny thing. The fact that they lost does NOT make the statement incorrect.

Nice try. You two were ecxtatic over her and called it a win for McCain right then and there. In fact, weren't you the schmuck, drunk with confidence after the Palin choice, who bet everyone, including me, that McDickhead would win?

travelinman67 wrote:...when 78% of all the MSM news during an election favors your candidate, and your own party's controlled Congress has been funding a national voter registration crime syndicate to cherry pick voters for your party...

...and you only win by 7.3% after replacing the opponent's low-favorable rating President...

...you shouldn't be patting yourself on the back too hard...

You make a big mistake in this post, T-Man. You assume that the dark side possesses both intellectual integrity and honor, when in fact, they possess neither. They make fun of such core values and pat themselves on the back for doing so.

native wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:...when 78% of all the MSM news during an election favors your candidate, and your own party's controlled Congress has been funding a national voter registration crime syndicate to cherry pick voters for your party...

...and you only win by 7.3% after replacing the opponent's low-favorable rating President...

...you shouldn't be patting yourself on the back too hard...

You make a big mistake in this post, T-Man. You assume that the dark side possesses both intellectual integrity and honor, when in fact, they possess neither. They make fun of such core values and pat themselves on the back for doing so.

Core values such as?

houndawg wrote:The election had already been over for two years before Palin was dragged up out of the mud, so she didn't hurt McCain, but she didn't change anyone's mind with the exception of Tina Fay and some political cartoonists. She probably increased turnout slightly among the wack job wing of the Party.

Picking Palin was the political equivalent of UNI's last play against Richmond in the semi's last year. With no better results.

Ouch.

I see the 'Dawg is on his game today!!

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:That's the funny thing. The fact that they lost does NOT make the statement incorrect.

Nice try. You two were ecxtatic over her and called it a win for McCain right then and there. In fact, weren't you the schmuck, drunk with confidence after the Palin choice, who bet everyone, including me, that McDickhead would win?

Apples and oranges, my dear friend. The fact he didn't win, and the fact she was the right choice, are two totally different things. And I misunderestimated the sheeple effect in this country.

AZGrizFan wrote:

houndawg wrote:The election had already been over for two years before Palin was dragged up out of the mud, so she didn't hurt McCain, but she didn't change anyone's mind with the exception of Tina Fay and some political cartoonists. She probably increased turnout slightly among the wack job wing of the Party.

Picking Palin was the political equivalent of UNI's last play against Richmond in the semi's last year. With no better results.

Ouch.

I see the 'Dawg is on his game today!!

No doubt....so, can we agree that UNI is the Palin of FCS?

Appaholic wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Ouch.

I see the 'Dawg is on his game today!!

No doubt....so, can we agree that UNI is the Palin of FCS?

expletive-laden tirade from Cap'n, D1B, PFL or Clenz in 5...4...3...