Fox News: Ralph Peters suggests Taliban should kill US Soldi
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:44 pm
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=7595
I pretty much just said the same thing to John St.Scum on the other site.CID1990 wrote:Not a deserter until found guilty of desertion by Summary or General Courts Martial.
The UCMJ has a very specific remedy for desertion in wartime, but that is for our own military to handle, not the Taliban. (That being said.... I don't think that the full penalty for wartime desertion has been carried out in a very long time, not to mention the civil penalty for treason during wartime. I'd still pay good money to watch Jane Fonda get hers.)
JohnStOnge wrote:How that clip is viewed depends upon whether or not the guy is indeed a traitor. What Peters said was "if" he's a traitor then.... And he made it clear that he doesn't know right now; though he does clearly suspect.
UNHWildCats wrote:No he didnt suggest it "if" he's a traitor, he suggested it if he did indeed go AWOL from his unit... Going AWOL doesn't make one a traitor, and frankly I dont care if he was a traitor, you dont go wishing for the Taliban to kill the guy... He is an American and like any other American he deserves his day in an American military court.
UNHWildCats wrote:I pretty much just said the same thing to John St.Scum on the other site.CID1990 wrote:Not a deserter until found guilty of desertion by Summary or General Courts Martial.
The UCMJ has a very specific remedy for desertion in wartime, but that is for our own military to handle, not the Taliban. (That being said.... I don't think that the full penalty for wartime desertion has been carried out in a very long time, not to mention the civil penalty for treason during wartime. I'd still pay good money to watch Jane Fonda get hers.)
JohnStOnge wrote:How that clip is viewed depends upon whether or not the guy is indeed a traitor. What Peters said was "if" he's a traitor then.... And he made it clear that he doesn't know right now; though he does clearly suspect.UNHWildCats wrote:No he didnt suggest it "if" he's a traitor, he suggested it if he did indeed go AWOL from his unit... Going AWOL doesn't make one a traitor, and frankly I dont care if he was a traitor, you dont go wishing for the Taliban to kill the guy... He is an American and like any other American he deserves his day in an American military court.
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Fonda helped keep people in torturous situations for longer periods of time.
She was a coward and I am sure thats why many of you can relate.
Cap'n Cat wrote:ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Fonda helped keep people in torturous situations for longer periods of time.
She was a coward and I am sure thats why many of you can relate.
McCain and his captive brothers were among the stupidest motherfvckers to put on a uniform, too, Chumley. Unlike hundreds of others who walked away after giving up bullsh*t, inaccurate info which Charlie fell for, he had to cling to some outmoded notion of what is "brave" and "patriotic" and get the fvck kicked outta him for years and years, unnecessarily.
Fonda should be on fvcking Rushmore.
AZGrizFan wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:
McCain and his captive brothers were among the stupidest motherfvckers to put on a uniform, too, Chumley. Unlike hundreds of others who walked away after giving up bullsh*t, inaccurate info which Charlie fell for, he had to cling to some outmoded notion of what is "brave" and "patriotic" and get the fvck kicked outta him for years and years, unnecessarily.
Fonda should be on fvcking Rushmore.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fish ain't bitin' today, Cappy.![]()
![]()
Feel free to take it that way if you must, but you'd be wrong---again. But you're used to that, I'm sure. I just don't feel like beating your "FondaLove" argument to smithereens---again. But you're used to THAT, too.Cap'n Cat wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fish ain't bitin' today, Cappy.![]()
![]()
I'm taking that as massive tacit agreement. And fear among the tenderest Conk souls here, yourself included, that The Cap'n is correct, once again. Monumentally brilliant, too. Fvck, they oughta be puttin' Me on Rushmore.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
AZGrizFan wrote:Feel free to take it that way if you must, but you'd be wrong---again. But you're used to that, I'm sure. I just don't feel like beating your "FondaLove" argument to smithereens---again. But you're used to THAT, too.Cap'n Cat wrote:
I'm taking that as massive tacit agreement. And fear among the tenderest Conk souls here, yourself included, that The Cap'n is correct, once again. Monumentally brilliant, too. Fvck, they oughta be puttin' Me on Rushmore.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wrong again. And again. And again. Next!Cap'n Cat wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
Feel free to take it that way if you must, but you'd be wrong---again. But you're used to that, I'm sure. I just don't feel like beating your "FondaLove" argument to smithereens---again. But you're used to THAT, too.
Hey, bruh, we look at it differently, no issues. You've never beat that argument up because you can't win, Slappy. She's a hero and I hope she lives to 119.
![]()
![]()
Nothing personal me pinning you like this all the time. Just business.
Yeah, Cap...you're the champ alright...Cap'n Cat wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
Feel free to take it that way if you must, but you'd be wrong---again. But you're used to that, I'm sure. I just don't feel like beating your "FondaLove" argument to smithereens---again. But you're used to THAT, too.
Hey, bruh, we look at it differently, no issues. You've never beat that argument up because you can't win, Slappy. She's a hero and I hope she lives to 119.
![]()
![]()
Nothing personal me pinning you like this all the time. Just business.
