Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

That's what all this socialist bailouts could cost us...

That's what the Obama appointee looking over the bailouts is going to tell Congress tomorrow...

In fact, $23 trillion is more than the total cost of all the wars the United States has ever fought, put together. World War II, for example, cost $4.1 trillion in 2008 dollars, according to the Congressional Research Service.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25164.html

Hey, Hoagie, it's time to pay the fiddler for Conk abuse and neglect. Can't say much else, homey!

Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, Hoagie, it's time to pay the fiddler for Conk abuse and neglect. Can't say much else, homey!

I understand you can't say much else....all you know how to do is blame "conks"...

So the donks have NO responsibility....

Hypothetical talking point is all it is.

“The $23.7 trillion estimate generally includes programs at the hypothetical maximum size envisioned when they were established,” Williams said. “It was never likely that all these programs would be ‘maxed out’ at the same time.”

Col Hogan wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, Hoagie, it's time to pay the fiddler for Conk abuse and neglect. Can't say much else, homey!

I understand you can't say much else....all you know how to do is blame "conks"...

So the donks have NO responsibility....

They have less than do the Conks.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

Col Hogan wrote:
I understand you can't say much else....all you know how to do is blame "conks"...

So the donks have NO responsibility....

They have less than do the Conks.

So it's time to pay for Donk abuse and neglect.....









Wait, the fox is guarding the hen house....

Col Hogan wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

They have less than do the Conks.

So it's time to pay for Donk abuse and neglect.....



Wait, the fox is guarding the hen house....

Suggestion: Wait a couple years to see how it nets out instead of being Conk teenage naysayer bullies in the sandbox. Your shit didn't work, capitalism is on its deathbed. Time for new ideas.

You guys and your proclivity for accurately predicting the future, it's simply astounding! Like the asshole at the '92 Conk convention who said electing Clinton would be a return to the stagflation days of Carter.

Whoopsy-doodle! Dust off that crystal ball, kids!!!

Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, Hoagie, it's time to pay the fiddler for Conk abuse and neglect. Can't say much else, homey!

Do you ever stop and think about what you're saying before you post?

Seriously?

Even at the $14 trillion figure presented by the CBO a few months ago after Stimulus Failus was passed...

...that's a $14 trillion bill we just handed to our children and grandchildren.

Now, I realize in your passive/aggressive perception of child rearing, you may believe punishing your children for errors they HAVE NEVER COMMITTED might be a good way to "temper" them for hard-times, but in my perception, taking a $14 trillion debt resulting from our generation's inability to grow up and take ownership of a collapsed economy (i.e., spend less time watching the "Planet Earth" channel and more time BUILDING FACTORIES TO REPAIR OUR GDP) and forcing it on children too young to vote and their children who are not even born...

...IS THE EPITOME OF CHILD ABUSE.

This is no joke, B...

...we are subjugating our children and grandchildren to excruciating poverty, economic slavery, and potentially the loss of the freedoms earned with and protected for the past 225 years with the lives of millions of Americans.


It's time to sell the boat and spend the weekends teaching your kids how to farm and be self-sufficient.

travelinman67 wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, Hoagie, it's time to pay the fiddler for Conk abuse and neglect. Can't say much else, homey!

Do you ever stop and think about what you're saying before you post?

Seriously?

The answer is an unequivocal "NO, he doesn't." He's proven that time and time again.

AZGrizFan wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:
Do you ever stop and think about what you're saying before you post?

Seriously?

The answer is an unequivocal "NO, he doesn't." He's proven that time and time again.

Oh, wonderful, Tweedle Dumb (T) and Tweedle Dickhead (Z) - Two loudmouthed fuckers who have been DEAD WRONG for 9 years straight and counting, and NOW they're geniuses!



"Who said Palin was the best decision ever?"
"The Fat one"
"Which ONE!!???"

Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, Hoagie, it's time to pay the fiddler for Conk abuse and neglect. Can't say much else, homey!

Ignorant partisan response.

Even a moron knows that when you dont have money you dont spend money.

This idiot community organizer needs to be dealt with.

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote: Even a moron knows that when you dont have money you dont spend money.

This idiot community organizer needs to be dealt with.

First: There is not a politician alive that believes (once they are in office) that you don't spend money - please show me an example in the last 40 years where this is true
Second: Vote him out in 4 years... (good luck)

The idea that somehow this is all a big surprise and "shocking" is amazing... the guy is a Liberal Democrat what the hell did you expect he was going to do - Jeezus we just had 8 years of record spending with Republican majorities in the house & Senate...

And now with Democrats in power you expect a cut-back in spending...!!!
(how f_cking stupid are you guys)
It has been a joy to watch however... so thank you for that

Cleets Part 2 wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote: Even a moron knows that when you dont have money you dont spend money.

This idiot community organizer needs to be dealt with.

(how f_cking stupid are you guys)
It has been a joy to watch however... so thank you for that

The answer is an unequivocal "Very, very fucking stupid" Conks have proven that time and time again.

Cleets Part 2 wrote:

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote: Even a moron knows that when you dont have money you dont spend money.

This idiot community organizer needs to be dealt with.

First: There is not a politician alive that believes (once they are in office) that you don't spend money - please show me an example in the last 40 years where this is true
Second: Vote him out in 4 years... (good luck)

The idea that somehow this is all a big surprise and "shocking" is amazing... the guy is a Liberal Democrat what the hell did you expect he was going to do - Jeezus we just had 8 years of record spending with Republican majorities in the house & Senate...

And now with Democrats in power you expect a cut-back in spending...!!!
(how f_cking stupid are you guys)
It has been a joy to watch however... so thank you for that

You are not informing me of anything, I got it.

I want them all executed on PPV, we can take the money raised off the event to pay back our debt and start over with a new batch of criminals/politicians.

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
The answer is an unequivocal "NO, he doesn't." He's proven that time and time again.

Oh, wonderful, Tweedle Dumb (T) and Tweedle Dickhead (Z) - Two loudmouthed fuckers who have been DEAD WRONG for 9 years straight and counting, and NOW they're geniuses!

Here's D---the big fat angry white man.

AZGrizFan wrote:

D1B wrote:
Oh, wonderful, Tweedle Dumb (T) and Tweedle Dickhead (Z) - Two loudmouthed fuckers who have been DEAD WRONG for 9 years straight and counting, and NOW they're geniuses!

Here's D---the big fat angry white man.

Z, you love me an you know it.

Did you take your avatar picture after she smelled your cawk?

Cap'n Cat wrote:Time for new ideas.

Nationalization of private enterprise is hardly a new idea, Cap'n.

Neither is socialized medicine.

Ouch..................

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote: I want them all executed on PPV, we can take the money raised off the event to pay back our debt and start over with a new batch of criminals/politicians.

Well,
Minus the execution part... That's my schtick too

CID1990 wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:Time for new ideas.

Nationalization of private enterprise is hardly a new idea, Cap'n.
Neither is socialized medicine.

Agreed CID
I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones.

(Who said that..? Somebody famous)

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Here's D---the big fat angry white man.

Z, you love me an you know it.

It's a mutual thingy.

D1B wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
The answer is an unequivocal "NO, he doesn't." He's proven that time and time again.

Oh, wonderful, Tweedle Dumb (T) and Tweedle Dickhead (Z) - Two loudmouthed fuckers who have been DEAD WRONG for 9 years straight and counting...

Source?





Citations?








Got nothin', huh?

travelinman67 wrote:Source?





Citations?



Got nothin', huh?

Don't bother liberals about sources, T-Man. They don't need no stinkin' sources, they just know, in their little heart of hearts, that they're right.

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, Hoagie, it's time to pay the fiddler for Conk abuse and neglect. Can't say much else, homey!

Ignorant partisan response.

Even a moron knows that when you dont have money you dont spend money.

This idiot community organizer needs to be dealt with.

Hey, moron, someone forgot to tell that to Reagan!!!!!!

We agree on something, Reagan was a moron!!!

BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!