Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

The Science and Public Policy Institute announces the publication of Climate Money, a study by Joanne Nova revealing that the federal Government has a near-monopsony on climate science funding. This distorts the science towards self-serving alarmism. Key findings:

The US Government has spent more than $79 billion of taxpayers’ money since 1989 on policies related to climate change, including science and technology research, administration, propaganda campaigns, foreign aid, and tax breaks. Most of this spending was unnecessary.

Despite the billions wasted, audits of the science are left to unpaid volunteers. A dedicated but largely uncoordinated grassroots movement of scientists has sprung up around the globe to test the integrity of “global warming” theory and to compete with a lavishly-funded, highly-organized climate monopsony. Major errors have been exposed again and again.

Carbon trading worldwide reached $126 billion in 2008. Banks, which profit most, are calling for more. Experts are predicting the carbon market will reach $2 - $10 trillion in the near future. Hot air will soon be the largest single commodity traded on global exchanges.

Meanwhile, in a distracting sideshow, Exxon-Mobil Corp is repeatedly attacked for paying just $23 million to skeptics—less than a thousandth of what the US government spends on alarmists, and less than one five-thousandth of the value of carbon trading in 2008 alone.

The large expenditure designed to prove the non-existent connection between carbon and climate has created a powerful alliance of self-serving vested interests.

By pouring so much money into pushing a single, scientifically-baseless agenda, the Government has created not an unbiased investigation but a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Sound science cannot easily survive the vice-like grip of politics and finance.

Says Nova, “For the first time, the numbers from government documents have been compiled in one place. It’s time to start talking of “Monopolistic Science”. It’s time to expose the lie that those who claim “to save the planet” are the underdogs. And it’s time to get serious about auditing science, especially when it comes to pronouncements that are used to justify giant government programs and massive movements of money.”

Appaholic wrote:But D & Cappy, don't you realize this is money that could used to subsidize water projects that enable a Cali Agricorp Multinational to employ illegal aliens so they can send money home to Mexico?

travelinman67 wrote:This is just welfare for no'er do well politicians and wanna-be scientists whose incompetence prevents them from succeeding as leaders and thinkers: The failures and so-called "underdogs" (mutts) of society.

Makes sense libs and tree-huggers would back the scheme...

Cap'n Cat wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:This is just welfare for no'er do well politicians and wanna-be scientists whose incompetence prevents them from succeeding as leaders and thinkers: The failures and so-called "underdogs" (mutts) of society.

Makes sense libs and tree-huggers would back the scheme...

Displaced, marginalized right wing whacko snarling.

travelinman67 wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

Displaced, marginalized right wing whacko snarling.

aka; "Landlord, businessman, leader".

Cap'n Cat wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:
aka; "Landlord, businessman, leader".

You forgot one: hater.

travelinman67 wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

You forgot one: hater.

Sayeth the King of the ad hominem.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

travelinman67 wrote:
Sayeth the King of the ad hominem.

T, just pokin' you. I know you're a straight up good guy and I wish you nothing but primo shit, bud!