Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Where's the outrage?
Isn't he a traitor?

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull

dbackjon wrote:Where's the outrage?
Isn't he a traitor?

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull

Such things do not apply to Conks, Jon.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. It's just Huck.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Where's the outrage?
Isn't he a traitor?

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull

Such things do not apply to Conks, Jon.

Of course not. Just wait, the Conks will turn this around and accuse the Donks of a double standard.

No he is not a traitor. Neither is the fat dixie chick. Both are idiots but that doesn't make them a traitor.


If there is a god she will never allow Mike Huckabee to be president. One from Arkansas in my lifetime is enough.

HI54UNI wrote:No he is not a traitor. Neither is the fat dixie chick. Both are idiots but that doesn't make them a traitor.

Agreed. But the fact that this is barely a story speeks volumes about the so-called liberal bias of the media.

Another proof that the media has a conservative bias.

dbackjon wrote:

HI54UNI wrote:No he is not a traitor. Neither is the fat dixie chick. Both are idiots but that doesn't make them a traitor.

Agreed. But the fact that this is barely a story speeks volumes about the so-called liberal bias of the media.

Another proof that the media has a conservative bias.

Or it might just be indicative of how much the American public really cares about anything Huck says.

UNI88 wrote:

dbackjon wrote:
Agreed. But the fact that this is barely a story speeks volumes about the so-called liberal bias of the media.

Another proof that the media has a conservative bias.

Or it might just be indicative of how much the American public really cares about anything Huck says.

And they cared that much what a Dixie Chick said?

dbackjon wrote:Where's the outrage?
Isn't he a traitor?

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull

How do you maintain a straight face, Jon?

dbackjon wrote:

UNI88 wrote:
Or it might just be indicative of how much the American public really cares about anything Huck says.

And they cared that much what a Dixie Chick said?

I never had a problem with what the Dixie Chick said. People should be able to voice their opinions and concerns. Conflict and discussion lead to better understanding and better solutions.

The fact that a Dixie Chick's comments got more press than Huck's doesn't say much about his viablility as a presidential candidate.

native wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Where's the outrage?
Isn't he a traitor?

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull

How do you maintain a straight face, Jon?

Really hard for a gay man to maintain a straight face, duh...


Actually, that question is better posed to those that hyperventalated at the Dixie Chicks, burned their records, etc.

Besides, the Dixie Chicks were right, Huck is wrong again.

The folks that did all the Dixie Chick hating, are the very same crowd that organized the tea bagging parties, and who are hogging the mic at the "Town Hall Meetings." One and the same.

Next!

Wedgebuster wrote:Besides, the Dixie Chicks were right, Huck is wrong again.

The folks that did all the Dixie Chick hating, are the very same crowd that organized the tea bagging parties, and who are hogging the mic at the "Town Hall Meetings." One and the same.

Next!

And still believe Saddam was the master mind behind 9/11 (yes that's 1/3 of the US population)

Cleets Part 2 wrote:

Wedgebuster wrote:Besides, the Dixie Chicks were right, Huck is wrong again.

The folks that did all the Dixie Chick hating, are the very same crowd that organized the tea bagging parties, and who are hogging the mic at the "Town Hall Meetings." One and the same.

Next!

And still believe Saddam was the master mind behind 9/11 (yes that's 1/3 of the US population)

I have a chain Email from bush and cheney that proves it is the truth...

Wedgebuster wrote:Besides, the Dixie Chicks were right, Huck is wrong again.

The folks that did all the Dixie Chick hating, are the very same crowd that organized the tea bagging parties, and who are hogging the mic at the "Town Hall Meetings." One and the same.

Next!

Not me, pal. I hate the Dixie Chicks on the (lack of) merits. Their music sucks!

UNI88 wrote:

dbackjon wrote:
Agreed. But the fact that this is barely a story speeks volumes about the so-called liberal bias of the media.

Another proof that the media has a conservative bias.

Or it might just be indicative of how much the American public really cares about anything Huck says.

I think you are right. I never bought into the supposed liberal media bias argument. While I'm sure there is some bias, the media reports what it thinks we want to hear about. The news is ratings driven.

The Dixie Chicks were more popular when they made their comments than Huckabee is now, hence more media coverage of it.

Cleets Part 2 wrote:

Wedgebuster wrote:Besides, the Dixie Chicks were right, Huck is wrong again.

The folks that did all the Dixie Chick hating, are the very same crowd that organized the tea bagging parties, and who are hogging the mic at the "Town Hall Meetings." One and the same.

Next!

And still believe Saddam was the master mind behind 9/11 (yes that's 1/3 of the US population)

I've never met anyone who thinks that.

Harbored terrorists and promoted terrorism in Israel yes, masterminded the 9-11 attacks no.

dbackjon wrote:Where's the outrage?
Isn't he a traitor?

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull

If Jimmy Carter can do it, so can Huck. Carter was glorified by the liberal media for his trip to visit Hamas.

dbackjon wrote:

native wrote:
How do you maintain a straight face, Jon?

Really hard for a gay man to maintain a straight face, duh...


Actually, that question is better posed to those that hyperventalated at the Dixie Chicks, burned their records, etc.

It was Toby Keith's fault.

CID1990 wrote:

Cleets Part 2 wrote:

And still believe Saddam was the master mind behind 9/11 (yes that's 1/3 of the US population)

I've never met anyone who thinks that.

Harbored terrorists and promoted terrorism in Israel yes, masterminded the 9-11 attacks no.

Are you suggesting that because you never met someone who thinks that they aren't out there?

Sounds like something Ralph would say.

BlueHen86 wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I've never met anyone who thinks that.

Harbored terrorists and promoted terrorism in Israel yes, masterminded the 9-11 attacks no.

Are you suggesting that because you never met someone who thinks that they aren't out there?

Sounds like something Ralph would say.

Cleets suggests that 1/3 of our entire population believes it. I would think that if they were that numerous I would have met one by now.

I haven't even met one at my weekly Truther meetings.

CID1990 wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
Are you suggesting that because you never met someone who thinks that they aren't out there?

Sounds like something Ralph would say.

Cleets suggests that 1/3 of our entire population believes it. I would think that if they were that numerous I would have met one by now.

I haven't even met one at my weekly Truther meetings.

Sorry, I meant my weekly Birther meetings. I get my whackos mixed up.

Honestly, I think the difference-maker is that Huckabee is pro-Israel. No one has ever been savaged by the media giving a pro-Israel opinion.

Pwns wrote:Honestly, I think the difference-maker is that Huckabee is pro-Israel. No one has ever been savaged by the media giving a pro-Israel opinion.

Very valid point.