Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

A commentator at Canada Free Press says he has obtained copies of two documents apparently prepared by Democrats to certify Barack Obama as their nominee for president in 2008 that suggest House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew there was an unresolved issue with his eligibility under the U.S. Constitution.

Writer JB Williams describes himself as a "no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy." And he say's he's gotten possession of copies of the documents in question.

The first includes a verification that Obama and Joe Biden, then-candidate for vice president, "are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

The second form obtained by Williams appears identical, down to a typographical error in "through." But in this one, the verification of eligibility under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution is gone.

SeattleGriz wrote:If Obama has truly met all qualifications to be President, then why the need for two documents, as listed in the article?

It this sort of stuff that keeps this alive and going.


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109363

A commentator at Canada Free Press says he has obtained copies of two documents apparently prepared by Democrats to certify Barack Obama as their nominee for president in 2008 that suggest House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew there was an unresolved issue with his eligibility under the U.S. Constitution.

Writer JB Williams describes himself as a "no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy." And he say's he's gotten possession of copies of the documents in question.

The first includes a verification that Obama and Joe Biden, then-candidate for vice president, "are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

The second form obtained by Williams appears identical, down to a typographical error in "through." But in this one, the verification of eligibility under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution is gone.

RobsPics wrote:The fact of the matter is that the US Supreme Court has already ruled that Obama was born in the United States...and the court also rejected all the lawsuits claiming he wasn't born in the USA. And this is a court with a number of Conservative Judges (including Roberts who swore Obama into office).

citdog wrote:

RobsPics wrote:The fact of the matter is that the US Supreme Court has already ruled that Obama was born in the United States...and the court also rejected all the lawsuits claiming he wasn't born in the USA. And this is a court with a number of Conservative Judges (including Roberts who swore Obama into office).

the fact of the matter is that the 'head boy" has never produced the long form birth cert.....the jury remains out until this "manchurian canidate" does so

dbackjon wrote:World net daily.

Chizzang wrote:Seriously - this just shows how stupid 33% of the U.S. population really is...
borderline retarded

Gil Dobie wrote:

Chizzang wrote:Seriously - this just shows how stupid 33% of the U.S. population really is...
borderline retarded

And another 33% is perfectly sane

BlueHen86 wrote:

SeattleGriz wrote:If Obama has truly met all qualifications to be President, then why the need for two documents, as listed in the article?

It this sort of stuff that keeps this alive and going.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109363

Let it keep going. I gives the idiots something to do.

CID1990 wrote:I'd be curious to see what the Berfers would do if Obama actually produced a bona fide birth certificate. Most of them would probably not be convinced.

That's what the Troofers do... continue to make their claims in the face of irrefutable evidence to the contrary.

native wrote:

CID1990 wrote:I'd be curious to see what the Berfers would do if Obama actually produced a bona fide birth certificate. Most of them would probably not be convinced.

That's what the Troofers do... continue to make their claims in the face of irrefutable evidence to the contrary.

Bullshit! I would acknowledge it in a second if Obama merely met the same standard or proof that I had to meet to get a clearance.

CID1990 wrote:

native wrote:
Bullshit! I would acknowledge it in a second if Obama merely met the same standard or proof that I had to meet to get a clearance.

My point is that even if Obama produced the documentation, there would still be donks posting goofy berfer sh!t, wasting message board space that could be better taken up with pictures of tits or something.

native wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
Let it keep going. I gives the idiots something to do.

I value your opinion, Mr. Blue Pants, and you might be right.

But if it is so idiotic, why can't Obama provide the same documentation that I had to provide to get a clearance?!???

Why no transparency on birth certificates and school records????

citdog wrote:

RobsPics wrote:The fact of the matter is that the US Supreme Court has already ruled that Obama was born in the United States...and the court also rejected all the lawsuits claiming he wasn't born in the USA. And this is a court with a number of Conservative Judges (including Roberts who swore Obama into office).

the fact of the matter is that the 'head boy" has never produced the long form birth cert.....the jury remains out until this "manchurian canidate" does so

native wrote:

CID1990 wrote:I'd be curious to see what the Berfers would do if Obama actually produced a bona fide birth certificate. Most of them would probably not be convinced.

That's what the Troofers do... continue to make their claims in the face of irrefutable evidence to the contrary.

Bullshit! I would acknowledge it in a second if Obama merely met the same standard or proof that I had to meet to get a clearance.

houndawg wrote:

native wrote:
Bullshit! I would acknowledge it in a second if Obama merely met the same standard or proof that I had to meet to get a clearance.

I doubt it. Why are your panties in such a twist? Hell, the last CinC was a deserter.

native wrote:

houndawg wrote:
I doubt it. Why are your panties in such a twist? Hell, the last CinC was a deserter.

Little Bush was a douchebag but not a deserter. I give credit to Gore for serving as a reporter in Saigon, but Bush's odds of dying on military duty were greater in the few hours he spent flying the F-102 than were Gore's.

Why are you against Obama meeting the same standard of proof as every other federal employee needing a clearance?

BlueHen86 wrote:

native wrote:
Little Bush was a douchebag but not a deserter. I give credit to Gore for serving as a reporter in Saigon, but Bush's odds of dying on military duty were greater in the few hours he spent flying the F-102 than were Gore's.

Why are you against Obama meeting the same standard of proof as every other federal employee needing a clearance?

Only because Bush was the pilot.

native wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
Only because Bush was the pilot.

Every military aircraft has a "Cass A" mishap rating. "Class A" means either someone was killed or the aircraft was a total loss in the mishap. The Class A mishap rating for the F-102 was relatively high, about four times the Class A mishap rate for the F-16.

BlueHen86 wrote:

native wrote:
Every military aircraft has a "Cass A" mishap rating. "Class A" means either someone was killed or the aircraft was a total loss in the mishap. The Class A mishap rating for the F-102 was relatively high, about four times the Class A mishap rate for the F-16.

Hey, don't ruin my perfectly good cheapshot at Dubya with facts.