Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Someone please name ANY Conks who deserved to be even CONSIDERED for a Nobel Peace Prize from 1940 to the present. Just fvcking one!!


I'll start:

Well, there's.......no, not him. OK, then, how about.....nah, fvcker escalated Vietnam with carpet bombing. Alright, how about..........meh, guy gave US taxpayer support to death squads in Central America. Hmmmm, OK, what do you think of...............eek, no!

Running out of candidates, boys, li'l help?!?!?!?!

Sheeit, the only decent Conk person in the last 70 years was Gerald Ford!



"And I say, 'Fvck the Nobel Committee!' I have executed orders to bomb Stockholm with cruise missiles beginning at 0600 tomorrow."

norman borlaug

Karl Rove

Reagan gets a lot of credit for ending the Cold War. It would not have stunned me if Reagan and Gorbachev had been co-nominees or recipients.

I would argue that Reagan was more deserving than Obama.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Karl Rove

Karl Rove will decide when he is to receive a Nobel.

Now that I think about it, considering the mess that Iraq has become, maybe the elder George Bush should have gotten one for not overthrowing Saddam.

BlueHen86 wrote:Reagan gets a lot of credit for ending the Cold War. It would not have stunned me if Reagan and Gorbachev had been co-nominees or recipients.

I would argue that Reagan was more deserving than Obama.

No way in Hell, 86r. You can argue, but you won't get far. Dude invaded Grenada, financed death squads in Cental America, etc, etc. Nobel Peace doesn't go to old azzholes who invade small, virtually defenseless countries.

Most of you guys here need to re-read up on Reagan. Time has passed and away from his aura, now, historians are consigning him to presidential discredit Hell. And, he most decidedly did not either WIN nor END the Cold War.

Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

BlueHen86 wrote:Now that I think about it, considering the mess that Iraq has become, maybe the elder George Bush should have gotten one for not overthrowing Saddam.

That is offset for his failure to pull out in early October 1946.

ASUG8 wrote:Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

Yo, 8. reread my three issues that got him the award. Biggest of all, I beleive, is that it was a vote for hope. Encouragement.

ASUG8 wrote:Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

Yo, 8. reread my three issues that got him the award. Biggest of all, I beleive, is that it was a vote for hope. Encouragement.

ASUG8 wrote:Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

Yo, 8. reread my three issues that got him the award. Biggest of all, I beleive, is that it was a vote for hope. Encouragement.

ASUG8 wrote:Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

Yo, 8. reread my three issues that got him the award. Biggest of all, I beleive, is that it was a vote for hope. Encouragement.

ASUG8 wrote:Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

Yo, 8. reread my three issues that got him the award. Biggest of all, I beleive, is that it was a vote for hope. Encouragement.

ASUG8 wrote:Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

Yo, 8. I think it's a vote for hope. Guy's gonna slow down the hate trend in the world.

Cap'n.. I think you got caught up in a time loop like your signature.

UNHWildCats wrote:Cap'n.. I think you got caught up in a time loop like your signature.

Shor did!

Cap'n Cat wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:Reagan gets a lot of credit for ending the Cold War. It would not have stunned me if Reagan and Gorbachev had been co-nominees or recipients.

I would argue that Reagan was more deserving than Obama.

No way in Hell, 86r. You can argue, but you won't get far. Dude invaded Grenada, financed death squads in Cental America, etc, etc. Nobel Peace doesn't go to old azzholes who invade small, virtually defenseless countries.

Most of you guys here need to re-read up on Reagan. Time has passed and away from his aura, now, historians are consigning him to presidential discredit Hell. And, he most decidedly did not either WIN nor END the Cold War.

I was just throwing a name out there Cap'n. He wasn't nominated, so maybe you are correct.

But he did help in ending the Cold War and deserves some credit.

UNHWildCats wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:Now that I think about it, considering the mess that Iraq has become, maybe the elder George Bush should have gotten one for not overthrowing Saddam.

That is offset for his failure to pull out in early October 1946.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

ASUG8 wrote:Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

Yo, 8. I think it's a vote for hope. Guy's gonna slow down the hate trend in the world.

There might be something to that.

BlueHen86 wrote:Now that I think about it, considering the mess that Iraq has become, maybe the elder George Bush should have gotten one for not overthrowing Saddam.

BINGO..!!!

BlueHen86 wrote:

Cap'n Cat wrote:

No way in Hell, 86r. You can argue, but you won't get far. Dude invaded Grenada, financed death squads in Cental America, etc, etc. Nobel Peace doesn't go to old azzholes who invade small, virtually defenseless countries.

Most of you guys here need to re-read up on Reagan. Time has passed and away from his aura, now, historians are consigning him to presidential discredit Hell. And, he most decidedly did not either WIN nor END the Cold War.

I was just throwing a name out there Cap'n. He wasn't nominated, so maybe you are correct.

But he did help in ending the Cold War and deserves some credit.

Yeah, I wasn't trying to beat you up. If you were Z, I wouldn't have typed that last sentence, but, anyway, he gets some credit, but the end of the Cold War is a much deeper affair than headline-reading-only Conks think. In reality, the strongest case is for Mikhail Gorbachev. And, George Bush I actually closed the deal. Every US president and staffer and Secretary and soldier had a role in ending that conflict.

Henry Kissinger.

And Yasser Arafat -- but maybe he was a donk.

Cap'n Cat wrote:

ASUG8 wrote:Why is this being made into a big Conk/Donk issue? BHO isn't more deserving of this than other nominees out there based on what he'd actually accomplished by Feb 1 COMPLETELY IGNORING POLITICAL PARTIES. smfh

Yo, 8. I think it's a vote for hope. Guy's gonna slow down the hate trend in the world.

Based on that, give me an award and some cash for what I MIGHT do

Cap'n Cat wrote:

BlueHen86 wrote:
I was just throwing a name out there Cap'n. He wasn't nominated, so maybe you are correct.

But he did help in ending the Cold War and deserves some credit.

Yeah, I wasn't trying to beat you up. If you were Z, I wouldn't have typed that last sentence, but, anyway, he gets some credit, but the end of the Cold War is a much deeper affair than headline-reading-only Conks think. In reality, the strongest case is for Mikhail Gorbachev. And, George Bush I actually closed the deal. Every US president and staffer and Secretary and soldier had a role in ending that conflict.

Agree 100%. The fact that it ended without bloodshed is a credit to everyone who stood watch while it went on.