Page 1 of 3

Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:19 am
by D1B
You get the feeling if Obama discovered a cure for cancer, all the bitter and juvenile conks here (AZ, Baldy, Ivytwat, Hibaclenz, naive, alphadiarhea, etc) would argue that cancer was good for us and Obama should not have got involved? :nod:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:22 am
by AZGrizFan
D1B wrote:You get the feeling if Obama discovered a cure for cancer, all the bitter and juvenile conks here (AZ, Baldy, Ivytwat, Hibaclenz, naive, alphadiarhea, etc) would argue that cancer was good for us and Obama should not have got involved? :nod:
Well if he DID discover a cure for cancer, at least then he'd be logically considered for a Nobel Prize. :coffee: :coffee: :coffee:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:28 am
by D1B
AZGrizFan wrote:
D1B wrote:You get the feeling if Obama discovered a cure for cancer, all the bitter and juvenile conks here (AZ, Baldy, Ivytwat, Hibaclenz, naive, alphadiarhea, etc) would argue that cancer was good for us and Obama should not have got involved? :nod:
Well if he DID discover a cure for cancer, at least then he'd be logically considered for a Nobel Prize. :coffee: :coffee: :coffee:
He won the Peace prize you neanderfuck. Two totally different awards and not applicable, even in jest, here.

SMFH at dumb conks.

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:35 am
by AZGrizFan
D1B wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Well if he DID discover a cure for cancer, at least then he'd be logically considered for a Nobel Prize. :coffee: :coffee: :coffee:
He won the Peace prize you neanderfuck. Two totally different awards and not applicable, even in jest, here.

SMFH at dumb conks.
That's why I said "A" Nobel Prize. Reading is fundamental. Hater.

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:36 am
by Cleets Part 2
Try to enjoy this D1B...
It simply fuels an existing hatred that is now starting to take on a distinct characteristic

Not dissimilar to the Keystone Cops :rofl:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:48 am
by UNHWildCats
D1B wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Well if he DID discover a cure for cancer, at least then he'd be logically considered for a Nobel Prize. :coffee: :coffee: :coffee:
He won the Peace prize you neanderfuck. Two totally different awards and not applicable, even in jest, here.

SMFH at dumb conks.
ITS THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE you neanderfuck

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:50 am
by AZGrizFan
UNHWildCats wrote:
D1B wrote:
He won the Peace prize you neanderfuck. Two totally different awards and not applicable, even in jest, here.

SMFH at dumb conks.
ITS THE NOBEL PEACE PRICE you neanderfuck
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:52 am
by UNHWildCats
AZGrizFan wrote:
UNHWildCats wrote: ITS THE NOBEL PEACE PRICE you neanderfuck
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
bite me :coffee:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:54 am
by bobbythekidd
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: at this thread.

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:13 am
by Cap'n Cat
bobbythekidd wrote::rofl: :rofl: :rofl: at this thread.

Me, too. D1B is right...again.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:18 am
by D1B
AZGrizFan wrote:
D1B wrote:
He won the Peace prize you neanderfuck. Two totally different awards and not applicable, even in jest, here.

SMFH at dumb conks.
That's why I said "A" Nobel Prize. Reading is fundamental. Hater.
Oh, I read it, CEO. Don't matter, it was a poor association and not worthy of an intelligent person, which you are undoubtedly not.

Sorry to smack you, but you're annoying. :nod:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:21 am
by AZGrizFan
D1B wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
That's why I said "A" Nobel Prize. Reading is fundamental. Hater.
Oh, I read it, CEO. Don't matter, it was a poor association and not worthy of an intelligent person, which you are undoubtedly not.

Sorry to smack you, but you're annoying. :nod:
Truth hit ya too close to home? :coffee:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:29 am
by D1B
AZGrizFan wrote:
D1B wrote:
Oh, I read it, CEO. Don't matter, it was a poor association and not worthy of an intelligent person, which you are undoubtedly not.

Sorry to smack you, but you're annoying. :nod:
Truth hit ya too close to home? :coffee:

Oh god no. You attempted to make a seriously dumb equation of two totally opposite entities (peace vs medicine) and I punched you in the gut with it, because you're annoying. Now maybe you with think twice before opening your big mouth. :nod:

Nothing hits me, you know that. :nod:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:30 am
by AZGrizFan
D1B wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Truth hit ya too close to home? :coffee:

Oh god no. You attempted to make a seriously dumb equation of two totally opposite entities (peace vs medicine) and I punched you in the gut with it, because you're annoying. Now maybe you with think twice before opening your big mouth. :nod:

Nothing hits me, you know that. :nod:
Kind of like that last guy you got in a fight with, where you beat up his fist with your face?

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:33 am
by Cap'n Cat
AZGrizFan wrote:
D1B wrote:

Oh god no. You attempted to make a seriously dumb equation of two totally opposite entities (peace vs medicine) and I punched you in the gut with it, because you're annoying. Now maybe you with think twice before opening your big mouth. :nod:

Nothing hits me, you know that. :nod:
Kind of like that last guy you got in a fight with, where you beat up his fist with your face?

Last time he got in a fight, it was with me, in 1990!!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:53 am
by D1B
AZGrizFan wrote:
D1B wrote:

Oh god no. You attempted to make a seriously dumb equation of two totally opposite entities (peace vs medicine) and I punched you in the gut with it, because you're annoying. Now maybe you with think twice before opening your big mouth. :nod:

Nothing hits me, you know that. :nod:
Kind of like that last guy you got in a fight with, where you beat up his fist with your face?

Congratulations, you have now used that tired cliche for the 1000th time, this month! :lol: Surpassing "a broken clock is right twice per day".

Oh the humanity. :shake:

PM me if you want some fresh material. :coffee:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:54 am
by D1B
Cap'n Cat wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: Kind of like that last guy you got in a fight with, where you beat up his fist with your face?

Last time he got in a fight, it was with me, in 1990!!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

That you know of. :coffee:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:55 am
by AZGrizFan
D1B wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: Kind of like that last guy you got in a fight with, where you beat up his fist with your face?

Congratulations, you have now used that tired cliche for the 1000th time, this month! :lol: Surpassing "a broken clock is right twice per day".

Oh the humanity. :shake:

PM me if you want some fresh material. :coffee:
I do believe that's the first time I've ever used that. But the PM is on the way.

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:58 am
by D1B
AZGrizFan wrote:
D1B wrote:

Congratulations, you have now used that tired cliche for the 1000th time, this month! :lol: Surpassing "a broken clock is right twice per day".

Oh the humanity. :shake:

PM me if you want some fresh material. :coffee:
I do believe that's the first time I've ever used that. But the PM is on the way.

It's a classic nonetheless. I use the close relative: "Yeah, you really hurt the guy with that vicious head butt to his fist!"

:lol:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:00 pm
by AZGrizFan
D1B wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: I do believe that's the first time I've ever used that. But the PM is on the way.

It's a classic nonetheless. I use the close relative: "Yeah, you really hurt the guy with that vicious head butt to his fist!"

:lol:
A useful variation thereof....

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:43 pm
by clenz
I'll bite...



Cancer does have a "purpose" in this world, much like many other diseases and disasters. It is one, of the many, natural ways the world tries to keep the population in check. The over population of the world is what is, in the end, going to fuck us all over.


:coffee:

Re: Conks

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:46 pm
by BlueHen86
D1B wrote:You get the feeling if Obama discovered a cure for cancer, all the bitter and juvenile conks here (AZ, Baldy, Ivytwat, Hibaclenz, naive, alphadiarhea, etc) would argue that cancer was good for us and Obama should not have got involved? :nod:
I think the argument would be that Bush would have discovered the cure first, but Clinton cut research funding 8 years earlier.

Re: Conks

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:55 pm
by ALPHAGRIZ1
Thank a Conk for creating and defending the country you live in and the opportunity for you to make ignorant posts and threads.

Re: Conks

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:37 am
by D1B
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Thank a Conk for creating and defending the country you live in and the opportunity for you to make ignorant posts and threads.
What a dumbass. Liberals and freethinkers created this country. If you fucks existed back then, we'd still be under British rule.

SMFH

Re: Conks

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:35 am
by houndawg
ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Thank a Conk for creating and defending the country you live in and the opportunity for you to make ignorant posts and threads.
Thanks for your service, son. Your work in the Mess-Kit Repair Brigade was instrumental to our great victory over terrorism.