Of looking like crap beating a mediocre VT team?Pwns wrote:Champions of what?griz37 wrote:Clenz, this was Ryan Van Bergens Facebook status before the game today, gives me chills.
"I'll wear the winged helmet for the last time tonight. Me and my teammates have been called losers, unathletic, disappointments, incapable, and embarrassments amongst other things over the past 3 years. Tonight that changes. Tonight, we will be given the opportunity to be called "champions". And those who stay...will be"
Number of top 25 BCS teams that VT beat=ZER0. VT lost not once, but twice, both times, once at home, CONVINCINGLY, to a Clempson team that just got absolutely annihilated 70-33 in the Orange bowl. VT was nothing more than a mediocre BCS team.
Number of top 25 BCS teams that Michigan beat before the Sugar Bowl= 1, Nebraska at #20 before they got destroyed by SC in their bowl game. So that might = 0 when the final standings come out.
Had to be the 2 most over rated, undeserving teams to ever play in the Sugar Bowl. Here are the teams that got skipped over in the BCS standings for VT and Michigan, current post bowl game records:
6. Arkansas 10-2 (Cotton Bowl vs K State)
7. Boise St. 12-1
8. Kansas St. 10-2 (Cotton Bowl)
9. South Carolina 11-2
10. Wisconsin 10-3
Michigan was outgained 377-184, but won in OT due to special teams, turnovers & a contoverial call in OT (hence the term "Chokies". I kept on hearing Denard Robinson this, Denard Robinson that, about how he is some great duel threat QB. 1 game I see him play against a mediocre VT team 9-21 passing, 117, 2 TD, 1 INT. 13 carries, 13 yards. Clearly way over-rated.
Michigan looked like crap beating a mediocre VT team, yet you have Clenz on here posting all these photos acting like Michigan looked good beating a good team.
Should try waiting till Michigan actually beats a good team in a big game (and not on some fluke after getting outgained by almost 200)

