dbackjon wrote:Closest MWC school to TCU was UNM, at over 600 miles. Doubt they drove that much in any sport.
Right and if you have to fly an extra 500 miles isn't much of an additional cost factor.
dbackjon wrote:Closest MWC school to TCU was UNM, at over 600 miles. Doubt they drove that much in any sport.
The Big East already has a BCS bowl bid.AssKickinChicken wrote:That BCS bowl money will pay for a lot of softball trips.89Hen wrote: That's yet to be seen. Football, yes, but wait until softball has to take another plane trip.
That does make one wonder how you guys out west can afford to even have sports other than football and basketball.dbackjon wrote:Closest MWC school to TCU was UNM, at over 600 miles. Doubt they drove that much in any sport.
89Hen wrote:That does make one wonder how you guys out west can afford to even have sports other than football and basketball.dbackjon wrote:Closest MWC school to TCU was UNM, at over 600 miles. Doubt they drove that much in any sport.
They were in serious danger of losing it.89Hen wrote:The Big East already has a BCS bowl bid.AssKickinChicken wrote:
That BCS bowl money will pay for a lot of softball trips.
And then the WAC would file suit against the MWC for "stealing" Boise, Fresno State, and Nevada.Wedgebuster wrote:MWC should file suit against the BCS for the loss of this member.
This is bull ****, and needs to be stopped.
No, different altogether. TCU was lured away by the BCS and their AC conferences. The damage done to college football by the BCS criminals is against Federal Anti-Trust laws. The BCS will die by the justice system, just stay tuned.Skjellyfetti wrote:And then the WAC would file suit against the MWC for "stealing" Boise, Fresno State, and Nevada.Wedgebuster wrote:MWC should file suit against the BCS for the loss of this member.
This is bull ****, and needs to be stopped.
Wedgebuster wrote:No, different altogether. TCU was lured away by the BCS and their AC conferences. The damage done to college football by the BCS criminals is against Federal Anti-Trust laws. The BCS will die by the justice system, just stay tuned.Skjellyfetti wrote:
And then the WAC would file suit against the MWC for "stealing" Boise, Fresno State, and Nevada.
Then shouldn't they sue the BCS? That's what the Utah Attorney General is doing.Wedgebuster wrote:No, different altogether. TCU was lured away by the BCS and their AC conferences. The damage done to college football by the BCS criminals is against Federal Anti-Trust laws. The BCS will die by the justice system, just stay tuned.Skjellyfetti wrote:
And then the WAC would file suit against the MWC for "stealing" Boise, Fresno State, and Nevada.
Skelly, this point is not really that high a flyer, but you seem to be missing it. The BCS had nothing to do with WAC teams moving to another non automatic qualifying conference, the teams were just working to get into a conference that fit their geography better and lower thier travel expenses.Skjellyfetti wrote:Then shouldn't they sue the BCS? That's what the Utah Attorney General is doing.Wedgebuster wrote:
No, different altogether. TCU was lured away by the BCS and their AC conferences. The damage done to college football by the BCS criminals is against Federal Anti-Trust laws. The BCS will die by the justice system, just stay tuned.
I'm not defending the BCS or anything. Just saying that conferences suing other conferences for raiding their members would be silly (especially a conference that has raided a conference a few months ago).
I agree, but neither does the Big XII having 10 teams or the Big Ten having 12 teams. Conference names mean very little now. Heck, the Big East has a school from Chicago and a school from Wisconsin playing basketball. It's crazy, but that's the game when millions of BC$ dollars are at stake.ASUG8 wrote:At least the USF add left the credibility of the conference name intact - adding TCU makes no sense in that regard.AZGrizFan wrote:
So was adding USF, but that didn't stop them did it?![]()
Not really. By most accounts, the MWC was going to get AQ status in December 2011, with BSU joining simply insurance in light of Utah possibly going to the Pac Ten. That was the primary motivation of both the MWC and BSU and it never had anything to do with trying to simplify geography (which it hardly did). Of course this was before Utah, BYU, and TCU jumped ship. The MWC invitation to BSU and BSU accepting it was entirely about AQ status--that is what they talked about when it happened and in the lead up to the decisions. And Nevada and Fresno State received offers when it appeared BYU was leaving, again to shore up the possibility of AQ status and for no other reason. Nevada and Fresno State joined the MWC precisely because they expected AQ status after December 2011.Wedgebuster wrote:\Skelly, this point is not really that high a flyer, but you seem to be missing it. The BCS had nothing to do with WAC teams moving to another non automatic qualifying conference, the teams were just working to get into a conference that fit their geography better and lower thier travel expenses.