SEC! SEC!

UNHWildCats · Post by **UNHWildCats** » Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:38 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:I'm not sure which it proves:

a) the SEC is a brutal conference
b) The Big 10 is a fucking joke.

It proves Big Ten Presidents shouldn't be talking shit about “Little Sisters of the Poor” since the Big 10 is going to wind up looking like a bunch of street rats when this bowl season is complete

Post by **MrTitleist** » Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:27 pm

SuperHornet wrote:This whole thread is meaningless.

As much as I hate the CAA, any game featuring CAA teams will be more entertaining and better generally than a game involving EITHER SEC or the conference that doesn't even know how to count.

Dude, playing daft on the internet isn't cool. CAA football is the most boring brand of FCS football to watch.

∞∞∞ · Post by **∞∞∞** » Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:37 pm

MrTitleist wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:This whole thread is meaningless.

As much as I hate the CAA, any game featuring CAA teams will be more entertaining and better generally than a game involving EITHER SEC or the conference that doesn't even know how to count.
Dude, playing daft on the internet isn't cool. CAA football is the most boring brand of FCS football to watch.

Agreed. I'm a CAA fan and think it's the best FCS conference, but I'm not gonna sit here and pretend like it's a fun league to watch. In fact, I often end up watching Big Sky or Southern Conference games instead. With ODU's style of play, hopefully we'll bring a little more offense (and Big Sky-esque fun) into the defense-minded CAA. I'd much rather watch a close high scoring game than a close low scoring one.

DJH · Post by **DJH** » Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:30 pm

The B10 has become the major villain of college athletics so its pretty damn funny watching them fall flat on their faces on all their big new year's day games. And they lost to a "mid major" team in their precious rose bowl game.

Gil Dobie · Post by **Gil Dobie** » Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:07 am

FargoBison wrote:The only good Big 10 teams are Wisconsin and Ohio State.

I think the initial Las Vegas odds had all the Big 10 teams as underdogs except Ohio St, so it's no surprise that they lost all those games. The Big 10 is 4-3 against the point spread though.

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:28 pm

SEC! SEC!

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:42 pm

Skjellyfetti wrote:SEC! SEC!

We'll see what you're saying after it's confirmed that Auburn was 0-14 this year....

Post by **Silenoz** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:44 pm

SO close to having the CAA and SECtards quieted for just ONE year. Christ

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:49 pm

The rest of the conferences need to stick to sports with round balls.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:52 pm

Silenoz wrote:SO close to having the CAA and SECtards quieted for just ONE year. Christ

You mean they won't shut up after they're declared cheaters later this week?

Post by **Silenoz** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:58 pm

No, this title won't be stripped for several years at least. But it'll be ancient history by then

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:11 pm

Silenoz wrote:No, this title won't be stripped for several years at least. But it'll be ancient history by then

The NCAA can't strip the title. It's awarded by the BCS.

2004 USC "vacated" the national title game for playing an inelible player. They're still 2004 BCS national champions.

eagleskins · Post by **eagleskins** » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:03 am

SEC went 5-5. Hardly something to write home about. This was not a national title. Just like last year wasn't. Boise would have walked the field with Bama. Texas, with that sorry ass true freshman QB that led them to a 5 win season, almost had them beat. TCU beats both teams tonight.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:30 am

eagleskins wrote:SEC went 5-5. Hardly something to write home about. This was not a national title. Just like last year wasn't. Boise would have walked the field with Bama. Texas, with that sorry ass true freshman QB that led them to a 5 win season, almost had them beat. TCU beats both teams tonight.

Cue Willie in 3...2...1...

Post by **tampajag** » Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:35 am

SuperHornet wrote:
eagleskins wrote:SEC went 5-5. Hardly something to write home about. This was not a national title. Just like last year wasn't. Boise would have walked the field with Bama. Texas, with that sorry ass true freshman QB that led them to a 5 win season, almost had them beat. TCU beats both teams tonight.

Cue Willie in 3...2...1...

might want to restart that countdown

Post by **Silenoz** » Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:43 am

Skjellyfetti wrote:
Silenoz wrote:No, this title won't be stripped for several years at least. But it'll be ancient history by then
The NCAA can't strip the title. It's awarded by the BCS.

2004 USC "vacated" the national title game for playing an inelible player. They're still 2004 BCS national champions.

Potato Potatoh

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!

Re: SEC! SEC!