Sugar Bowl

All other college sports!
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by Pwns »

griz37 wrote:Clenz, this was Ryan Van Bergens Facebook status before the game today, gives me chills.

"I'll wear the winged helmet for the last time tonight. Me and my teammates have been called losers, unathletic, disappointments, incapable, and embarrassments amongst other things over the past 3 years. Tonight that changes. Tonight, we will be given the opportunity to be called "champions". And those who stay...will be"
Champions of what? :rofl:
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by ∞∞∞ »

Just woke up and saw that the Chokies choked away another BCS bowl. How surprising. Someone tell me up when they start inviting teams that actually deserve to be there in$tead of the likes of Michigan and VaTech.
clenz wrote:He was stuttering on every kick for some reason....A lot of people are saying it should be a false start. I don't know if it is or not, but I've watched that same thing happen on hundred of kicks (hs through NFL) and never saw a false start caled on it.
It's a false start, although rarely called for some reason. I've seen it once on the collegiate level and I was personally called for it twice in high school.
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

Pwns wrote:
griz37 wrote:Clenz, this was Ryan Van Bergens Facebook status before the game today, gives me chills.

"I'll wear the winged helmet for the last time tonight. Me and my teammates have been called losers, unathletic, disappointments, incapable, and embarrassments amongst other things over the past 3 years. Tonight that changes. Tonight, we will be given the opportunity to be called "champions". And those who stay...will be"
Champions of what? :rofl:
Image

Image
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by andy7171 »

The stripes on the shoulders looked stupid.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

andy7171 wrote:The stripes on the shoulders looked stupid.
I'm sorry....I can't see the stripes past the freaking Championship Trophy :rofl:


Image



Seriously though, yeah I wish Michigan would get back to the standard Michigan uniform.....ever since Adidas took over they have been terrible.
dal4018
Level5
Level5
Posts: 10679
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: South Carolina St
A.K.A.: SC State

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by dal4018 »

Pwns wrote:Merry Christmas Brady Hoke. You got a BCS bowl bid you didn't deserve and then the Chokies gift-wrap you the game. :evil:
Even though I rooted for Michigan the refs blew it on that one handed td grab for Va.Tech in the second half.
dal4018
Level5
Level5
Posts: 10679
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: South Carolina St
A.K.A.: SC State

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by dal4018 »

clenz wrote:
andy7171 wrote:The stripes on the shoulders looked stupid.
I'm sorry....I can't see the stripes past the freaking Championship Trophy :rofl:


Image



Seriously though, yeah I wish Michigan would get back to the standard Michigan uniform.....ever since Adidas took over they have been terrible.
Why did they dump Nike or was it the other way around?
User avatar
Willie
Level4
Level4
Posts: 8474
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:34 pm
Location: O-H-I-O

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by Willie »

What was up with the gray facemasks last night?
Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway. - John Wayne
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

1. That catch wasn't a catch. After he hit the ground the ball moved. It was only a slight movement but it moved. By rule the ball can't moved....oh and there is the fact the ball hit the ground as well.

2. Michigan went to ADIDAS because...well I don't know the full reason but ADIDAS offered more money than Nike and at the time more B10 schools were ADIDAS....After some research the ADIDAS deal was worth 7.5million dollars per year over 8 years, or double what the 7 year Nike contract that they had just come out of after 2007 was worth. The deal with Adidas expires after the 2015-2016 years. I really hope Nike makes a push to get Michigan back. Part of the reason Nike didn't pony up like Adidas did was they saw what was about to happen to Michigan football....


3. This was the second time this year Michigan wore the grey facemasks - the other being the ND game with the "legacy jersey" game. The grey was a "throwback" to the 50's and-1974. Michigan's jersey's weren't "throwback" in the traditional sense. Each of the 3 difference jerseys they wore were "legacy" jerseys that incorporated pieces of Michigan jerseys dating back to the turn of the 1900s. The same with the numbers. The grey facemask with numbers on the side was worn from 59-68, then the number was dropped in 69 and the facemask was moved to blue in 1975. The team wore the same helmet for the ND game, and liked the numbers on the helmet so much they wore it for the entire B1G season, and added the grey facemask in last night. I don't know if the numbers will carry to next year or not though.
Last edited by clenz on Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Willie
Level4
Level4
Posts: 8474
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:34 pm
Location: O-H-I-O

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by Willie »

Yeah they need to ditch the gray masks...looked goofy. Too much going on with 4 different colors.
Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway. - John Wayne
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

Willie wrote:Yeah they need to ditch the gray masks...looked goofy. Too much going on with 4 different colors.
I agree.

Keep the numbers with the blue facemask.

Go with a plain blue top with maize numbers at home
Plain white top with blue numbers outlined in yellow on the road

yellow pants


Pretty much going back to the Nike uniforms...and Michigan uniforms of old

Image
Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36130
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by BDKJMU »

dal4018 wrote:
Pwns wrote:Merry Christmas Brady Hoke. You got a BCS bowl bid you didn't deserve and then the Chokies gift-wrap you the game. :evil:
Even though I rooted for Michigan the refs blew it on that one handed td grab for Va.Tech in the second half.
Yep. Was clearly a (phenomenal) catch.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36130
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by BDKJMU »

Willie wrote:Just glad the Big Ten won another game.
Yeah. 1-10 in New Years Day bowl games the last 2 season, 0-5 last season and 1-4 this season and they had to go to OT to get that win, Mich State over GA.

The Big Least, ACC, and Big 10 all suck as far as BCS conferences go.
Last edited by BDKJMU on Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by Grizalltheway »

clenz wrote:
Pwns wrote:
Champions of what? :rofl:
Image

Image
I realize Michigan is your team, and, while there's nothing wrong with celebrating a victory, any bowl 'championship' doesn't mean jack shit.
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

Grizalltheway wrote:
clenz wrote: Image

Image
I realize Michigan is your team, and, while there's nothing wrong with celebrating a victory, any bowl 'championship' doesn't mean jack shit.
Those who stay will be champions.....those that stayed *cough not the fucking Boren douchefuck cough* were champions....I know the game "doesn't matter" to anyone outside of the school, but damn it feels good after the last three years to get it.
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by Grizalltheway »

Fair nuff. I will admit that it was great to see my Ducks finally get it done in a big bowl game. :nod:
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

Grizalltheway wrote:Fair nuff. I will admit that it was great to see my Ducks finally get it done in a big bowl game. :nod:
Ducks are probably my second or third FBS team that I follow. I started with Harrington following them and then the jersey fun started and they got fun to watch. Dennis Dixon is what really locked me into them. Watching him was a ton of fun - even when they beat my Wolverines in 07.

It was real nice to see them get the W.


I was listening to some sports talking heads tonight and they feel if Michigan can find a suitable replacement for Martin and Van Bergen upfront the title game will come down to USC and the winner of the Michigan/Alabama game.
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

FWIW here is a photo of the no-catch in OT. You can see the way the ball in angled there is no way the ball isn't going to hit the ground (which it did), or not move when it hits the ground (which it did)

Image

From this photo you can see he still doesn't have control, even though his elbow is down in bounds.

The ball will hit the ground yet, and he won't gain control until his is OB.

Image
Last edited by clenz on Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
griz37
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1557
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:14 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: unwrittengriz

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by griz37 »

clenz wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:Fair nuff. I will admit that it was great to see my Ducks finally get it done in a big bowl game. :nod:
Ducks are probably my second or third FBS team that I follow. I started with Harrington following them and then the jersey fun started and they got fun to watch. Dennis Dixon is what really locked me into them. Watching him was a ton of fun - even when they beat my Wolverines in 07.

It was real nice to see them get the W.


I was listening to some sports talking heads tonight and they feel if Michigan can find a suitable replacement for Martin and Van Bergen upfront the title game will come down to USC and the winner of the Michigan/Alabama game.
I hope that is true, but it is a pretty tough schedule next year. The wife & I are hoping to get down to Jerryworld for the Bama game.
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

Difference in creativity in the two fan bases

VaTech's version of a sign
Image

Michigan's sign - a great play on the MSU fans bitching and crying over the bowl selections
Image
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

Because I love looking through photos of last night

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
ImageImage
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36130
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by BDKJMU »

clenz wrote:FWIW here is a photo of the no-catch in OT. You can see the way the ball in angled there is no way the ball isn't going to hit the ground (which it did), or not move when it hits the ground (which it did)

Image

From this photo you can see he still doesn't have control, even though his elbow is down in bounds.

The ball will hit the ground yet, and he won't gain control until his is OB.

Image
:roll: You can't tell from the photo whether or not he has control. Both arms are around the ball before it hits the ground. Can't find the colleg reception rule, but the NFL states "A slight movement of the ball will not be considered a loss of possession"

A still photo is a poor substitute for slo motion video.
[youtube][/youtube]
The commentators after they saw both angles in slo mo were calling it a catch. You're just blinded by your Michigan homerism.

The refs also gifted Michigan twice in OT with an obvious false start by the Michigan kicker that should have been flagged but wasn't.
http://www.businessinsider.com/watch-mi ... oul-2012-1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Michigan got their 20 regulation points off the chokies special team choking (13) and int (7). They certainly didn't look good- VT otherwise dominated on both sides of the ball. Robinson is overrated. It doesn't matter. ACC and Big 10 both still suck.
Last edited by BDKJMU on Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by clenz »

Not a catch...ball movement = no control....that is what was said during the broadcast of the game.....also it's the same rule that bit Michigan in the ass during the final seconds of the Iowa game.
dal4018
Level5
Level5
Posts: 10679
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: South Carolina St
A.K.A.: SC State

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by dal4018 »

clenz wrote:FWIW here is a photo of the no-catch in OT. You can see the way the ball in angled there is no way the ball isn't going to hit the ground (which it did), or not move when it hits the ground (which it did)

Image

From this photo you can see he still doesn't have control, even though his elbow is down in bounds.

The ball will hit the ground yet, and he won't gain control until his is OB.

Image
When I first saw it I thought it was a touchdown!!!!!!!
dal4018
Level5
Level5
Posts: 10679
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: South Carolina St
A.K.A.: SC State

Re: Sugar Bowl

Post by dal4018 »

clenz wrote:1. That catch wasn't a catch. After he hit the ground the ball moved. It was only a slight movement but it moved. By rule the ball can't moved....oh and there is the fact the ball hit the ground as well.

2. Michigan went to ADIDAS because...well I don't know the full reason but ADIDAS offered more money than Nike and at the time more B10 schools were ADIDAS....After some research the ADIDAS deal was worth 7.5million dollars per year over 8 years, or double what the 7 year Nike contract that they had just come out of after 2007 was worth. The deal with Adidas expires after the 2015-2016 years. I really hope Nike makes a push to get Michigan back. Part of the reason Nike didn't pony up like Adidas did was they saw what was about to happen to Michigan football....


3. This was the second time this year Michigan wore the grey facemasks - the other being the ND game with the "legacy jersey" game. The grey was a "throwback" to the 50's and-1974. Michigan's jersey's weren't "throwback" in the traditional sense. Each of the 3 difference jerseys they wore were "legacy" jerseys that incorporated pieces of Michigan jerseys dating back to the turn of the 1900s. The same with the numbers. The grey facemask with numbers on the side was worn from 59-68, then the number was dropped in 69 and the facemask was moved to blue in 1975. The team wore the same helmet for the ND game, and liked the numbers on the helmet so much they wore it for the entire B1G season, and added the grey facemask in last night. I don't know if the numbers will carry to next year or not though.
I figured that Michigan would continue its relationship with NIKE after all these yrs.
Post Reply