Marshall
Miami - FL
Ohio
Eastern Michigan
@Illinois
Indiana
@Wisconsin
Purdue
@Minnesota
Penn State
@Iowa
Michigan


Why is it a joke? College football is a business, why shouldn't Ohio St. schedule as many home games as possible?DJH wrote:Features EIGHT home games, and FOUR road games. What a joke.![]()
Marshall
Miami - FL
Ohio
Eastern Michigan
@Illinois
Indiana
@Wisconsin
Purdue
@Minnesota
Penn State
@Iowa
Michigan


I can't stand Ohio St. (unless they are playing Notre DameCatMom wrote:Do we really care what OSU does?
The Little Eleven schedule ALWAYS works out this way - 8 games - 4 home, 4 away.Willie wrote:Just the way the Big Ten schedule worked out this year. Quitch yer bitchin'.

BlueHen86 wrote:Why is it a joke? College football is a business, why shouldn't Ohio St. schedule as many home games as possible?DJH wrote:Features EIGHT home games, and FOUR road games. What a joke.![]()
Marshall
Miami - FL
Ohio
Eastern Michigan
@Illinois
Indiana
@Wisconsin
Purdue
@Minnesota
Penn State
@Iowa
Michigan

But never by me. I've always been on Montana's side of this argument. Every school would love to schedule 8 home games, only a few are able to do it.grizzaholic wrote:BlueHen86 wrote:
Why is it a joke? College football is a business, why shouldn't Ohio St. schedule as many home games as possible?
And yet, Montana gets slammed for having home games by your brethren as well?????

BlueHen86 wrote:But never by me. I've always been on Montana's side of this argument. Every school would love to schedule 8 home games, only a few are able to do it.grizzaholic wrote:
And yet, Montana gets slammed for having home games by your brethren as well?????

This just makes it easier for Ohio St. to get to and lose the BCS title game.DJH wrote:Features EIGHT home games, and FOUR road games. What a joke.![]()
Marshall
Miami - FL
Ohio
Eastern Michigan
@Illinois
Indiana
@Wisconsin
Purdue
@Minnesota
Penn State
@Iowa
Michigan

I agree, playing 8 home games is nothing new & I'm sure there are many FBS teams that play 8.clenz wrote:This got me curious, so I went through all the teams that currently have their schedule released and here are all the teams with home games.
8 home games
Kansas
Missouri
Texas
Texas A&M
Michigan State
Ohio State
Penn State
Notre Dame (one of them is an iffy home game since it is at Yankee Stadium against Army, but I think ND is the official home team)
Auburn
The average, outside of the PAC10 because of their conference slate, thus far is 7 home games, so instead of playing one road OOC game OSU is going to pay someone (Probably looks like it was Marshall or Eastern Michigan instead of the road game) about 400K to come to the Horseshoe. OSU will then take a gate of about 103,000 people at probably $60 or $70 a head, I don't know what OSU charges. Let's go with $60. Well, at 60*103000 you net $218,000 after paying the other school. Add into that programs, merchandise, concessions, etc... and they will likely pull well over a million dollar profit for the game.
Compare that to getting paid 750K by a USC, Texas, Florida, etc... then having to pay travel. They would be stupid to do that unless they get a home and home like they did with Texas and USC.
I know for a fact Michigan had 8 home games last year. Teams that turn massive profits for home games don't need to "equal the field" by playing 7 home games just like everyone else.

This has nothing to do with the big 10.Willie wrote:Just the way the Big Ten schedule worked out this year. Quitch yer bitchin'.
Nope...it has to do with programs and athletic departments doing what they are able to do...make millions of dollars rather than going on the road..DJH wrote:This has nothing to do with the big 10.Willie wrote:Just the way the Big Ten schedule worked out this year. Quitch yer bitchin'.

It is normal, but does highlight the great financial inequities in college sports (not saying it is good or bad, but just is).clenz wrote:Nope...it has to do with programs and athletic departments doing what they are able to do...make millions of dollars rather than going on the road..DJH wrote:
This has nothing to do with the big 10.
It's really a non story.
Those organizations don't get to pick their schedule. The MLB and NFL do. Colleges are in charge of their OOC games in all sports.dbackjon wrote:It is normal, but does highlight the great financial inequities in college sports (not saying it is good or bad, but just is).clenz wrote: Nope...it has to do with programs and athletic departments doing what they are able to do...make millions of dollars rather than going on the road..
It's really a non story.
Imagine if the Yankees got to play 120 home games, or the Cowboys played 12 of 16 at home.
And how the fuck not? There are teams in the Big Ten that each team doesn't play every year. So when they do play again, the dates and place fall where they fall, not the choice of the teams.DJH wrote:This has nothing to do with the big 10.Willie wrote:Just the way the Big Ten schedule worked out this year. Quitch yer bitchin'.

What does that have to do with Ohio St scheduling all of their OOC conference games at home?Willie wrote:And how the fuck not? There are teams in the Big Ten that each team doesn't play every year. So when they do play again, the dates and place fall where they fall, not the choice of the teams.DJH wrote:
This has nothing to do with the big 10.
What big school doesn't? Just read clenz's post up there.BlueHen86 wrote:What does that have to do with Ohio St scheduling all of their OOC conference games at home?Willie wrote: And how the fuck not? There are teams in the Big Ten that each team doesn't play every year. So when they do play again, the dates and place fall where they fall, not the choice of the teams.

Willie wrote:And how the fuck not? There are teams in the Big Ten that each team doesn't play every year. So when they do play again, the dates and place fall where they fall, not the choice of the teams.DJH wrote:
This has nothing to do with the big 10.

This is right. Nobody is saying they shouldn't do it if they can. The problem is that they can do it. This is what is wrong with college football. To have programs that can play TWICE as many home games as road games is just absolutely ridiculous.dbackjon wrote:It is normal, but does highlight the great financial inequities in college sports (not saying it is good or bad, but just is).clenz wrote: Nope...it has to do with programs and athletic departments doing what they are able to do...make millions of dollars rather than going on the road..
It's really a non story.
Imagine if the Yankees got to play 120 home games, or the Cowboys played 12 of 16 at home.

Do you seriously not understand this? jesus...Willie wrote:And how the fuck not? There are teams in the Big Ten that each team doesn't play every year. So when they do play again, the dates and place fall where they fall, not the choice of the teams.DJH wrote:
This has nothing to do with the big 10.

ConfirmedWillie wrote:Way to stereotype...