Only one team has a winning record - Troy at 5-4.
The conference is led by FIU at 4-1. FIU's overall record? 4-5
Only FIU, FAU and Troy could finish the season with winning records, and for FAU, that would require beating Texas.
OOC Record? 4-28, with games against Texas, South Carolina, Navy and Kansas State left.
The four wins?
2 FBS, 2 FCS
3 point win by Troy over 2-win Bowling Green
1 point win by FAU over 3-win Alabama-Birmingham
1 point win by UL-Monroe over 2-8 Southern Louisiana
23 point win by MTSU over 2-8 Austin Peay
Pathetic
The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
- MrTitleist
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 5932
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:02 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
Throw the Big East in this list. The Sun Belt is horrible.. the teams themselves are bad, plus they end up playing a lot of body bag games.. which really kills them.





- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
Not even close. The Big East sucks, but they are no where near the level of futility that the Sun Belt has established. The Big East may be the next to worst FBS conference, but it is a huge drop to the Sun Belt.MrTitleist wrote:Throw the Big East in this list. The Sun Belt is horrible.. the teams themselves are bad, plus they end up playing a lot of body bag games.. which really kills them.
If the Sun Belt dropped to FCS, they would not deserve an autobid.
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45623
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
BlueHen86 wrote:Not even close. The Big East sucks, but they are no where near the level of futility that the Sun Belt has established. The Big East may be the next to worst FBS conference, but it is a huge drop to the Sun Belt.MrTitleist wrote:Throw the Big East in this list. The Sun Belt is horrible.. the teams themselves are bad, plus they end up playing a lot of body bag games.. which really kills them.
If the Sun Belt dropped to FCS, they would not deserve an autobid.
This.
Sun Belt is flat out awful.
-
youngterrier
- Level3

- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
the MAC is pretty bad too. Out of the 5 non AQ conferences I'd rank them:
1) MWC
2) WAC
3) CUSA
4) MAC
5) Sun Belt
personally I think the ACC/Big East is only better than 2 of those 5 conferences for sure
1) MWC
2) WAC
3) CUSA
4) MAC
5) Sun Belt
personally I think the ACC/Big East is only better than 2 of those 5 conferences for sure
Last edited by youngterrier on Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
I am a Big East fan. The Sun Belt is the only conference that I'd definitely rank it ahead of. It might be better than the ACC, CUSA and MAC, but maybe not.youngterrier wrote:the MAC is pretty bad too. Out of the 5 non AQ conferences I'd rank them:
1) MWC
2) WAC
3) CUSA
4) MAC
5) Sun Belt
personally I think the ACC/Big East is only better than 2 of those 3 conferences for sure
I'd put the MWC and WAC ahead of it (and the ACC).
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45623
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
youngterrier wrote:the MAC is pretty bad too. Out of the 5 non AQ conferences I'd rank them:
1) MWC
2) WAC
3) CUSA
4) MAC
5) Sun Belt
personally I think the ACC/Big East is only better than 2 of those 5 conferences for sure
Bottom of the MAC is bad. Top is decent. So far, two 8 wins teams, and a seven win team, plus two 6 win teams.
OOC record of 15-37, FBS OOC of 7-35. Two FCS losses.
Wins over probable bowl teams UConn and Army. Also beat BCS conference teams in Purdue and Minnesota.
- MrTitleist
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 5932
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:02 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
In respect, the Big East is more pathetic than the Sun Belt. You see, with the Sun Belt there is no expectation of success, millions of dollars, large budgets etc... just a bunch of crappy football teams. So no one expects them to be good, or even moderately respectable. This is why the Big East is terrible. They get a BCS auto-bid, but will probably end the season with not a single team in the top 25. This will not be the first time it has happened, if I had to guess.





- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: The SuckBelt - why do they even bother to play football?
Over the years the Big East has done pretty well in bowl games, even after Miami, BC and Va Tech left. This is probably the worst the conference has been, even so, the Big East is 22-15 OOC, which is a far cry from the Sun Belt.MrTitleist wrote:In respect, the Big East is more pathetic than the Sun Belt. You see, with the Sun Belt there is no expectation of success, millions of dollars, large budgets etc... just a bunch of crappy football teams. So no one expects them to be good, or even moderately respectable. This is why the Big East is terrible. They get a BCS auto-bid, but will probably end the season with not a single team in the top 25. This will not be the first time it has happened, if I had to guess.
I agree that the Big East doesn't deserve a BCS autobid (neither does the ACC), but you are getting carried away if you think it is as a bad as the Sun Belt.