Page 1 of 1
If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:26 pm
by FargoBison
Since the FBS has 11 conferences there would be 11 autos and 11 at large spots.
FIU/Nebraska vs 1. Aurburn
Arkansas vs Oklahoma
UConn/Va Tech vs 4.Wisconsin
Boise St/Texas A&M vs 5. Stanford
Nevada/Oklahoma St vs 3.TCU
UCF/Alabama vs 6. Ohio St
Miami(oh)/Mizzou vs 2. Oregon
Michigan St vs LSU
Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:38 pm
by SuperHornet
Why 22? Wouldn't 24 be easier?
Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:44 pm
by FargoBison
SuperHornet wrote:Why 22? Wouldn't 24 be easier?
It seems like everyone wants as few teams as possible in a playoff and this would the least amount of teams you could have according to the NCAA rules. If the PFL got a bid, the FCS would likely move to 22.
Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:55 pm
by BlackFalkin
SEMIFINALS
AUB vs Boise
TCU vs Oregon
=
AUB vs Oregon

Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:05 pm
by AZGrizFan
FargoBison wrote:Since the FBS has 11 conferences there would be 11 autos and 11 at large spots.
FIU/Nebraska vs 1. Aurburn
Arkansas vs Oklahoma
UConn/Va Tech vs 4.Wisconsin
Boise St/Texas A&M vs 5. Stanford
Nevada/Oklahoma St vs 3.TCU
UCF/Alabama vs 6. Ohio St
Miami(oh)/Mizzou vs 2. Oregon
Michigan St vs LSU
Auburn v Arkansas
Wisconsin v Stanford
TCU v Alabama
Oregon v Michigan State
Auburn v Stanford
TCU v Oregon
Auburn v Oregon
Oregon
Game/Set/Match Pac-10.

Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:10 pm
by SuperHornet
BlackFalkin wrote:SEMIFINALS
AUB vs Boise
TCU vs Oregon
=
AUB vs Oregon

By that argument, EWU would be turning in the pads right now....
Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:23 pm
by BlueHen86
FargoBison wrote:SuperHornet wrote:Why 22? Wouldn't 24 be easier?
It seems like everyone wants as few teams as possible in a playoff and this would the least amount of teams you could have according to the NCAA rules. If the PFL got a bid, the FCS would likely move to 22.
Really? They just added 4 more teams to the playoffs this year.
Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:45 pm
by FargoBison
BlueHen86 wrote:FargoBison wrote:
It seems like everyone wants as few teams as possible in a playoff and this would the least amount of teams you could have according to the NCAA rules. If the PFL got a bid, the FCS would likely move to 22.
Really? They just added 4 more teams to the playoffs this year.
They had to if they wanted to give the NEC and Big South an autobid(autos cannot exceed at large bids).
Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:51 pm
by SuperHornet
BlueHen86 wrote:FargoBison wrote:
It seems like everyone wants as few teams as possible in a playoff and this would the least amount of teams you could have according to the NCAA rules. If the PFL got a bid, the FCS would likely move to 22.
Really? They just added 4 more teams to the playoffs this year.
I meant 24 would be easier to deal with than 22. Twenty seems about as easy to deal with as 24. It's the multiple of four that does it. Of course, the easiest are powers of two beacuse in that scenario there are NO byes.
Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:37 pm
by BlueHen86
FargoBison wrote:BlueHen86 wrote:
Really? They just added 4 more teams to the playoffs this year.
They had to if they wanted to give the NEC and Big South an autobid(autos cannot exceed at large bids).
But if they
wanted to give the NEC and Big South an autobid then they didn't want as few teams in as possible.
I realize that I am being a dick

, but you can't say that they wanted to expand and also say they wanted as few teams as possible in the playoffs.
Re: If the NCAA ran a FBS playoff....
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:39 pm
by BlueHen86
SuperHornet wrote:BlueHen86 wrote:
Really? They just added 4 more teams to the playoffs this year.
I meant 24 would be easier to deal with than 22. Twenty seems about as easy to deal with as 24. It's the multiple of four that does it. Of course, the easiest are powers of two beacuse in that scenario there are NO byes.
I don't care what you meant, I wasn't responding to you.
