Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://news.yahoo.com/sandusky-proclaim ... 17187.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Sandusky proclaims innocence in NBC interview

NEW YORK (AP) — Jerry Sandusky said in an interview with NBC that he is innocent of the child sex abuse charges that have rocked Penn State and cost Joe Paterno his job, though the former defensive coordinator admitted he "horsed around" and touched kids.

In a telephone interview, scheduled to be aired Monday night on NBC News' "Rock Center," Sandusky responded, "No," when Bob Costas asked if he was a pedophile.


"... I could say that I have done some of those things. I have horsed around with kids I have showered after workouts. I have hugged them and I have touched their legs without intent of sexual contact."

I just listened to the interview. He should fire his lawyer for allowing him to do that. The creepy factor just went up X6.93!

Yeah....there is something int he sound of his voice that is very very creepy.


Oh, and the way he answered the questioned didn't help him either.


What i find funny is that he has said he doesn't remember the specifics of what happened, but yet remembers the kids name, age, and everything that the defense is now claiming they have on the kid.

I truly hope that someone kills this guy before it goes to court.

93henfan wrote:I truly hope that someone kills this guy before it goes to court.

+2,040,302.

andy7171 wrote:I just listened to the interview. He should fire his lawyer for allowing him to do that. The creepy factor just went up X6.93!

Just listening to the half answers and the pauses...repeating of questions... He is guilty as sin.

Grizalltheway wrote:

93henfan wrote:I truly hope that someone kills this guy before it goes to court.

+2,040,302.

I would like to agree with 93henfan..


sorry GATW, agreeing with you more than once a week is not allowed.

Cowherd (even though he's EWU scum) is knocking it out of the park yet again today.

He pointed out that it took 17 seconds for Sandusky to answer the question "Are you sexually attracted to young boys, to underage boys?"

17 fucking seconds: "Am I sexually attracted to underage boys? Sexually attracted? You know, I enjoy young people. I love to be around them. Um, I, I, but no, I'm not sexually attracted to young boys."

This interview from the 80s is particularly disturbing, especially the comments starting around the 1:30 mark about "personal contact". What a sick, sick fuck.

[youtube][/youtube]

93henfan wrote:Cowherd (even though he's EWU scum) is knocking it out of the park yet again today.

He pointed out that it took 17 seconds for Sandusky to answer the question "Are you sexually attracted to young boys, to underage boys?"

17 fucking seconds: "Am I sexually attracted to underage boys? Sexually attracted? You know, I enjoy young people. I love to be around them. Um, I, I, but no, I'm not sexually attracted to young boys."

This interview from the 80s is particularly disturbing, especially the comments starting around the 1:30 mark about "personal contact". What a sick, sick fuck.

[youtube][/youtube]

I too have been listening to Cowherd, I think he is pretty good most of the time, and he is hitting the T-Balls out of the park. That lawyer is a complete kook. And Sandusky...well I think he explains himself perfectly.

Yeah, this guy isn't a pedophile at all. He is as innocent as Michael Jackson. Regardless. Of the sexual attraction, the behavior was inappropriate.

[youtube][/youtube]

Come on JSO. Defend this guy.

grizzaholic wrote:Come on JSO. Defend this guy.

This must be a real tough one for him. They're underage which is cool and all, but they're of the same sex. What's a psychopathic android to think about this?

andy7171 wrote:I just listened to the interview. He should fire his lawyer for allowing him to do that. The creepy factor just went up X6.93!

Put him in jail with grown men and he will see if they are horsing around after they find out who he is!!!!!!!!

dal4018 wrote:

andy7171 wrote:I just listened to the interview. He should fire his lawyer for allowing him to do that. The creepy factor just went up X6.93!

Put him in jail with grown men and he will see if they are horsing around after they find out who he is!!!!!!!!

Agreed. Dude is going to need some stitches.

People are coming out of the wood work with similar stories. NO WAY no one else knew this was going on.

andy7171 wrote:

dal4018 wrote: Put him in jail with grown men and he will see if they are horsing around after they find out who he is!!!!!!!!

Agreed. Dude is going to need some stitches.

People are coming out of the wood work with similar stories. NO WAY no one else knew this was going on.

Saw a blurb earlier today, missed some of it, but from what I got it said more folks have come forward and it goes back to the 70's.

andy7171 wrote:

dal4018 wrote: Put him in jail with grown men and he will see if they are horsing around after they find out who he is!!!!!!!!

Agreed. Dude is going to need some stitches.

People are coming out of the wood work with similar stories. NO WAY no one else knew this was'nt going on.

FIFY

GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:

andy7171 wrote: Agreed. Dude is going to need some stitches.

People are coming out of the wood work with similar stories. NO WAY no one else knew this was'nt going on.

FIFY

Really? I thought my was right?

How about this.

No one else knew about this going on, MY ASS.

andy7171 wrote:How about this.

No one else knew about this going on, MY ASS.

Another victim comes forward.

89Hen wrote:

andy7171 wrote:How about this.

No one else knew about this going on, MY ASS.

Another victim comes forward.

and I knew whay you meant Andy, I guess it is just a preference thing. All the negatives and my brain doesn't want to do math to decide it it is positive or negative.

Report: Alleged Sandusky Victims From As Far Back As The 1970s Contact Lawyers

http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/dish/20 ... ct-lawyers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

93henfan wrote:Cowherd (even though he's EWU scum) is knocking it out of the park yet again today.

He pointed out that it took 17 seconds for Sandusky to answer the question "Are you sexually attracted to young boys, to underage boys?"

17 fucking seconds: "Am I sexually attracted to underage boys? Sexually attracted? You know, I enjoy young people. I love to be around them. Um, I, I, but no, I'm not sexually attracted to young boys."

This interview from the 80s is particularly disturbing, especially the comments starting around the 1:30 mark about "personal contact". What a sick, sick fuck.

[youtube][/youtube]

Notice the fly that lands on his head and stays there. Flies are attracted to shit.

89Hen wrote:

andy7171 wrote:How about this.

No one else knew about this going on, MY ASS.

Another victim comes forward.