UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

All other college sports!
Post Reply
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by dbackjon »

I thought all Big Time FBS programs made money hand over fist?

Now, after staggering to losing football seasons in four of the last five years and seeing attendance drop to levels last seen in the 1970s, the Vols find themselves mired in more than $200 million of debt, the most in the SEC, with reserves of just $1.95 million, the least in the conference.

The athletic department spends a startling $21 million a year on debt payments, $13.5 million of which comes from the school’s stressed $99.5 million athletic budget and the rest from donations.

It’s an ugly financial picture for one of the nation’s strongest football brands, the kind of financial hole that SEC football giants aren’t supposed to be in, brought about by expensive coaching buyouts and costly improvements to Neyland Stadium and other athletic facilities, just as the losing seasons set in.

http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jour ... essee.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:thumb:
User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian State
Location: The Old North State

Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by ASUMountaineer »

dbackjon wrote:I thought all Big Time FBS programs made money hand over fist?

Now, after staggering to losing football seasons in four of the last five years and seeing attendance drop to levels last seen in the 1970s, the Vols find themselves mired in more than $200 million of debt, the most in the SEC, with reserves of just $1.95 million, the least in the conference.

The athletic department spends a startling $21 million a year on debt payments, $13.5 million of which comes from the school’s stressed $99.5 million athletic budget and the rest from donations.

It’s an ugly financial picture for one of the nation’s strongest football brands, the kind of financial hole that SEC football giants aren’t supposed to be in, brought about by expensive coaching buyouts and costly improvements to Neyland Stadium and other athletic facilities, just as the losing seasons set in.

http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jour ... essee.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
UTK does make money "hand-over-fist." The problem is, they spent more money than they were bringing in. I know it may be hard to comprehend, but typically when you spend more money than you have, you end up in debt. Fiscal mismanagement always leads to problems. :nod:
Appalachian State Mountaineers:

National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012


NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by dbackjon »

ASUMountaineer wrote:
dbackjon wrote:I thought all Big Time FBS programs made money hand over fist?

Now, after staggering to losing football seasons in four of the last five years and seeing attendance drop to levels last seen in the 1970s, the Vols find themselves mired in more than $200 million of debt, the most in the SEC, with reserves of just $1.95 million, the least in the conference.

The athletic department spends a startling $21 million a year on debt payments, $13.5 million of which comes from the school’s stressed $99.5 million athletic budget and the rest from donations.

It’s an ugly financial picture for one of the nation’s strongest football brands, the kind of financial hole that SEC football giants aren’t supposed to be in, brought about by expensive coaching buyouts and costly improvements to Neyland Stadium and other athletic facilities, just as the losing seasons set in.

http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jour ... essee.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
UTK does make money "hand-over-fist." The problem is, they spent more money than they were bringing in. I know it may be hard to comprehend, but typically when you spend more money than you have, you end up in debt. Fiscal mismanagement always leads to problems. :nod:
They may take in a lot of money, but not turning a profit (which would be making money) :geek:

They projected they would be able to make enough money to pay for everything. They didn't. They are not alone in this regard.
:thumb:
dal4018
Level5
Level5
Posts: 10679
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: South Carolina St
A.K.A.: SC State

Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by dal4018 »

Call Peyton for a loan lol!!!
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38528
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by CAA Flagship »

dbackjon wrote:
ASUMountaineer wrote:
UTK does make money "hand-over-fist." The problem is, they spent more money than they were bringing in. I know it may be hard to comprehend, but typically when you spend more money than you have, you end up in debt. Fiscal mismanagement always leads to problems. :nod:
They may take in a lot of money, but not turning a profit (which would be making money) :geek:

They projected they would be able to make enough money to pay for everything. They didn't. They are not alone in this regard.
No they are not alone. Our add a few zeros to the UT numbers and you have our Federal Government. :coffee:
User avatar
DSUrocks07
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 5339
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
I am a fan of: Delaware State
A.K.A.: phillywild305
Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware

Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by DSUrocks07 »

CAA Flagship wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
They may take in a lot of money, but not turning a profit (which would be making money) :geek:

They projected they would be able to make enough money to pay for everything. They didn't. They are not alone in this regard.
No they are not alone. Our add a few zeros to the UT numbers and you have our Federal Government. :coffee:
The Federal Government should drop down to FCS. Lower budget more regional rivalries, and BUS TRIPS!

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2
MEAC, last one out turn off the lights.

@phillywild305 FB
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by SDHornet »

DSUrocks07 wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: No they are not alone. Our add a few zeros to the UT numbers and you have our Federal Government. :coffee:
The Federal Government should drop down to FCS. Lower budget more regional rivalries, and BUS TRIPS!

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2
:lol: :lol: :clap:
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by SDHornet »

dbackjon wrote:I thought all Big Time FBS programs made money hand over fist?

Now, after staggering to losing football seasons in four of the last five years and seeing attendance drop to levels last seen in the 1970s, the Vols find themselves mired in more than $200 million of debt, the most in the SEC, with reserves of just $1.95 million, the least in the conference.

The athletic department spends a startling $21 million a year on debt payments, $13.5 million of which comes from the school’s stressed $99.5 million athletic budget and the rest from donations.

It’s an ugly financial picture for one of the nation’s strongest football brands, the kind of financial hole that SEC football giants aren’t supposed to be in, brought about by expensive coaching buyouts and costly improvements to Neyland Stadium and other athletic facilities, just as the losing seasons set in.

http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jour ... essee.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Amazing that even SEC teams are struggling to keep up in the arms races. They are eating their own now. Since this is a publicly funded university, I wonder how well this mismanagement is being taken by the taxpayers.
User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian State
Location: The Old North State

Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt

Post by ASUMountaineer »

dbackjon wrote:
ASUMountaineer wrote:
UTK does make money "hand-over-fist." The problem is, they spent more money than they were bringing in. I know it may be hard to comprehend, but typically when you spend more money than you have, you end up in debt. Fiscal mismanagement always leads to problems. :nod:
They may take in a lot of money, but not turning a profit (which would be making money) :geek:

They projected they would be able to make enough money to pay for everything. They didn't. They are not alone in this regard.
:roll: Semantics...the crux of my response is in the second sentence--spending more than you bring in. But, please...lecture me more on finances. :lol:

I am surprised that you take issue with UTK's athletic department for the way they have mismanaged their finances...
Appalachian State Mountaineers:

National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012


NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
Post Reply