Clemson 35, Wofford 27
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:35 pm
- I am a fan of: Wofford
Clemson 35, Wofford 27
We went up to Clemson and almost pulled it off. It was a good performance for the Terriers. We just came up a bit short. Ironically, I'm a lot happier after a LOSS today than I was after a WIN (against Presbyterian) last week.
On the other side of the coin, I can't say I'm very optimistic about the Tigers' chances the next 3 weeks against Auburn, Florida State, and Virginia Tech.
On the other side of the coin, I can't say I'm very optimistic about the Tigers' chances the next 3 weeks against Auburn, Florida State, and Virginia Tech.
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
The Terriers are my secondary team, and I'm disappointed....not with the effort, but that they couldn't shut those arrogant bastards up. At least now they have to try to figure out why a 1500 student college damn near beat them at their place.
There was a WoCo guy next to me downtown G'Ville tonight and I walked over to tell him the same. That being said, I'll pull for you until ASU visits Sparklecity.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15ee1/15ee12d4f4b4b69c999eb56010528239866bc482" alt="#thumb :thumb:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/030cd/030cddae53f395bf83b18998640515c0aa28fd61" alt="Nod :nod:"
There was a WoCo guy next to me downtown G'Ville tonight and I walked over to tell him the same. That being said, I'll pull for you until ASU visits Sparklecity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15ee1/15ee12d4f4b4b69c999eb56010528239866bc482" alt="#thumb :thumb:"
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
woffordgrad94 wrote:We went up to Clemson and almost pulled it off. It was a good performance for the Terriers. We just came up a bit short. Ironically, I'm a lot happier after a LOSS today than I was after a WIN (against Presbyterian) last week.
On the other side of the coin, I can't say I'm very optimistic about the Tigers' chances the next 3 weeks against Auburn, Florida State, and Virginia Tech.
Was going to give my Tiger diehard friend a jab but then remembered what happened to us last week so I let him slide.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72a10/72a107744776175e2f2e588a7a06e4de1d9e64a9" alt="Wink ;)"
-
- Level3
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
Well G8, I can honestly tell you that I would like App State a lot more if you didn't dominate the SoCon, and once we beat you in sparkle city in 3 weeks I'll pull for yall more oftenASUG8 wrote:The Terriers are my secondary team, and I'm disappointed....not with the effort, but that they couldn't shut those arrogant bastards up. At least now they have to try to figure out why a 1500 student college damn near beat them at their place.![]()
There was a WoCo guy next to me downtown G'Ville tonight and I walked over to tell him the same. That being said, I'll pull for you until ASU visits Sparklecity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d228/3d22852dc8f930e1d9cfd8db22c2e326b977ebb7" alt="Very Happy :D"
-
- Level3
- Posts: 2608
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:17 pm
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
MAJOR props from the CATS your way Wofford. We were ALL rooting for you as we were getting game updates during tailgating.
- Skjellyfetti
- Anal
- Posts: 14512
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
edit: dumb drunk post
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
- Aho Old Guy
- Level2
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:18 pm
- I am a fan of: Tweetsee
- A.K.A.: Evil & Nastie
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
No moral victories in a loss, gentlemen; you should have beat Clempson.
"But the damned and the guiltiest among you are the men who had the capacity to know, yet chose to blank out reality, the men who were willing to sell their intelligence into cynical servitude..."
- John Galt
- John Galt
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
Good thing since that would have led to your dad posting a thread here asking for bail money.youngterrier wrote: We left the wine and cheese at home.
twitter.com/tdogappst
App State's Final SoCon Record: 204-87-5
All Time W-L-T - 567-321-28
App State's Final SoCon Record: 204-87-5
All Time W-L-T - 567-321-28
-
- Level3
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
[youtube][/youtube]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d4b/d7d4bfb79833ea73ed9f9e7b268cd48e4bcb915c" alt="#rofl :rofl:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d4b/d7d4bfb79833ea73ed9f9e7b268cd48e4bcb915c" alt="#rofl :rofl:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d4b/d7d4bfb79833ea73ed9f9e7b268cd48e4bcb915c" alt="#rofl :rofl:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d4b/d7d4bfb79833ea73ed9f9e7b268cd48e4bcb915c" alt="#rofl :rofl:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d4b/d7d4bfb79833ea73ed9f9e7b268cd48e4bcb915c" alt="#rofl :rofl:"
- CID1990
- Level5
- Posts: 25481
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
I was following that game because the Summerall Guards performed at halftime in the game (guess clempson gave up on their own ROTC drill).
Loved seeing you guys put the fear in those people. I might dislike USC and FSU more than Clem's Son, but it is really a close race.
Loved seeing you guys put the fear in those people. I might dislike USC and FSU more than Clem's Son, but it is really a close race.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- crabbyterrier
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:43 am
- I am a fan of: wofford college
- A.K.A.: crabbyterrier
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
Aho Old Guy wrote:No moral victories in a loss, gentlemen; you should have beat Clempson.
yeah, we should have won the game. just watched it again on espn3 and we made some critical mistakes in untimely situations that definitely cost us the game. but i am still proud of the heart our guys showed on the field. they never give up in any game. now we use video as a learning tool for rest of season cause mistakes like some of those would have cost us a few close games last year. can't let that happen this yr!!!
thanks for all the compliments guys!
GO TERRIERS!!!
- Aho Old Guy
- Level2
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:18 pm
- I am a fan of: Tweetsee
- A.K.A.: Evil & Nastie
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
I was a great game to watch as an 'indifferent' observer but wrenching as a SoCon fan - I loved the fake punt.crabbyterrier wrote:Aho Old Guy wrote:No moral victories in a loss, gentlemen; you should have beat Clempson.
yeah, we should have won the game. just watched it again on espn3 and we made some critical mistakes in untimely situations that definitely cost us the game. but i am still proud of the heart our guys showed on the field. they never give up in any game. now we use video as a learning tool for rest of season cause mistakes like some of those would have cost us a few close games last year. can't let that happen this yr!!!
thanks for all the compliments guys!
GO TERRIERS!!!
It seemed yah just kinda ran outa steam in the second half and couldn't get in the end zone.
"But the damned and the guiltiest among you are the men who had the capacity to know, yet chose to blank out reality, the men who were willing to sell their intelligence into cynical servitude..."
- John Galt
- John Galt
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
That's when the bench depth begins to kick in...those extra schollies really pay off.Aho Old Guy wrote:I was a great game to watch as an 'indifferent' observer but wrenching as a SoCon fan - I loved the fake punt.crabbyterrier wrote:
yeah, we should have won the game. just watched it again on espn3 and we made some critical mistakes in untimely situations that definitely cost us the game. but i am still proud of the heart our guys showed on the field. they never give up in any game. now we use video as a learning tool for rest of season cause mistakes like some of those would have cost us a few close games last year. can't let that happen this yr!!!
thanks for all the compliments guys!
GO TERRIERS!!!
It seemed yah just kinda ran outa steam in the second half and couldn't get in the end zone.
- Aho Old Guy
- Level2
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:18 pm
- I am a fan of: Tweetsee
- A.K.A.: Evil & Nastie
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
I understand what you are saying but I'm not a big believer in the scholarship argument.ASUG8 wrote:That's when the bench depth begins to kick in...those extra schollies really pay off.Aho Old Guy wrote:
I was a great game to watch as an 'indifferent' observer but wrenching as a SoCon fan - I loved the fake punt.
It seemed yah just kinda ran outa steam in the second half and couldn't get in the end zone.
I think Clempson was smart enough (one of the few times you will find Clempson and smart in the same sentence) to adjust to the misdirection, cross-blocking, traps, etc. Ayers couldn't reach into his bag of tricks and find a couple more big plays or dog Clempson into another turnover or two.
The only issue I really had was I was hoping Ayers would have let some air out of the ball, played more keep-away and tried to limit possessions/big plays - whenever I was paying attention it seemed they would snap the ball with 15 seconds on the play clock. They did a good job with clock management - I just felt they could have done a bit better.
Otherwise - Wofford was there. A handful of plays made the difference in the game.
"But the damned and the guiltiest among you are the men who had the capacity to know, yet chose to blank out reality, the men who were willing to sell their intelligence into cynical servitude..."
- John Galt
- John Galt
-
- Level3
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
Really the difference was A) Clemson had wayyyyyyyy better athletes; I don't expect offenses to torch us so badly in the secondary this year. There were a lot of plays where their defensive ends just made damn good tackles and grabs and disruptions, I don't think we'll see any Defensive ends that good this year. As I've said before, our guys in the trenches were warriors. They outwieghed us by 30 pounds and were 3 inches taller across the board on the interior line across the board on defense and offense. B) we most certainly have not used our entire playbook. We only run one play from the pistol it seems and majority of our plays come from the flexbone whereas in years past we mostly use the shotgun and or pistol.Aho Old Guy wrote:I understand what you are saying but I'm not a big believer in the scholarship argument.ASUG8 wrote:
That's when the bench depth begins to kick in...those extra schollies really pay off.
I think Clempson was smart enough (one of the few times you will find Clempson and smart in the same sentence) to adjust to the misdirection, cross-blocking, traps, etc. Ayers couldn't reach into his bag of tricks and find a couple more big plays or dog Clempson into another turnover or two.
The only issue I really had was I was hoping Ayers would have let some air out of the ball, played more keep-away and tried to limit possessions/big plays - whenever I was paying attention it seemed they would snap the ball with 15 seconds on the play clock. They did a good job with clock management - I just felt they could have done a bit better.
Otherwise - Wofford was there. A handful of plays made the difference in the game.
- Skjellyfetti
- Anal
- Posts: 14512
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
FIFY.youngterrier wrote: I don't expect anyone but Brian Quick to torch us so badly in the secondary this year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72a10/72a107744776175e2f2e588a7a06e4de1d9e64a9" alt="Wink ;)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c9f7/3c9f789e255dedb0de3382ca26475058ab05edbc" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37cd4/37cd46b55f2590c9623fd0e951c65d74717fa205" alt="Image"
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
-
- Level3
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
yeah, you're right on that one......but honestly, I think we'll do better this year in terms of guarding him. I don't know why we use our 5 foot 8 guys to cover a 6 foot 5 receiver when we have a couple 6' 3 defensive backsSkjellyfetti wrote:FIFY.youngterrier wrote: I don't expect anyone but Brian Quick to torch us so badly in the secondary this year.![]()
- Aho Old Guy
- Level2
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:18 pm
- I am a fan of: Tweetsee
- A.K.A.: Evil & Nastie
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
6'-5" (tall) + 3'-7" (vertical) = Big Headaches 4 SoCon DBs This YearSkjellyfetti wrote:FIFY.youngterrier wrote: I don't expect anyone but Brian Quick to torch us so badly in the secondary this year.![]()
If Sat was any indication I don't think the 'formation' will jump start your passing game.youngterrier wrote:.... We only run one play from the pistol it seems and majority of our plays come from the flexbone whereas in years past we mostly use the shotgun and or pistol.
"But the damned and the guiltiest among you are the men who had the capacity to know, yet chose to blank out reality, the men who were willing to sell their intelligence into cynical servitude..."
- John Galt
- John Galt
-
- Level3
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
We've passed for an average of 150 yards the last 2 games which is pretty good for an option team....I don't know what you're getting at with that oneAho Old Guy wrote: 6'-5" (tall) + 3'-7" (vertical) = Big Headaches 4 SoCon DBs This Year
If Sat was any indication I don't think the 'formation' will jump start your passing game.youngterrier wrote:.... We only run one play from the pistol it seems and majority of our plays come from the flexbone whereas in years past we mostly use the shotgun and or pistol.
- CID1990
- Level5
- Posts: 25481
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
Skjellyfetti wrote:FIFY.youngterrier wrote: I don't expect anyone but Brian Quick to torch us so badly in the secondary this year.![]()
LOL the students in the upper right of the picture summarize Wofford nicely.
Is that the Ancient and Benevolent Order of Balls and Shaft, cheering their mighty Terriers to victory? I think I see David Spade!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bbe/26bbed563ecde384634ba129764e31d3e45512f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bbe/26bbed563ecde384634ba129764e31d3e45512f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bbe/26bbed563ecde384634ba129764e31d3e45512f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bbe/26bbed563ecde384634ba129764e31d3e45512f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bbe/26bbed563ecde384634ba129764e31d3e45512f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bbe/26bbed563ecde384634ba129764e31d3e45512f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bbe/26bbed563ecde384634ba129764e31d3e45512f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bbe/26bbed563ecde384634ba129764e31d3e45512f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
Seriously, suits, at a college football game??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d4b/d7d4bfb79833ea73ed9f9e7b268cd48e4bcb915c" alt="#rofl :rofl:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1584f/1584f8dc635bb7c273e633826fd05f582ab153bf" alt="Oh No :ohno:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d4b/d7d4bfb79833ea73ed9f9e7b268cd48e4bcb915c" alt="#rofl :rofl:"
- Aho Old Guy
- Level2
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:18 pm
- I am a fan of: Tweetsee
- A.K.A.: Evil & Nastie
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
youngterrier wrote:We've passed for an average of 150 yards the last 2 games which is pretty good for an option team....I don't know what you're getting at with that oneAho Old Guy wrote: 6'-5" (tall) + 3'-7" (vertical) = Big Headaches 4 SoCon DBs This Year
If Sat was any indication I don't think the 'formation' will jump start your passing game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d4b/d7d4bfb79833ea73ed9f9e7b268cd48e4bcb915c" alt="#rofl :rofl:"
Dude. Reality check. Wofford completed 2 passes against Clempson. On the first there wasn't a DB within 15 yds of your receiver. On the second, I believe it WAS from the shotgun and the receiver got away when 2 Clemson DBs bounced off of each other trying to make the tackle.
I have no opinion of your vaulted aerial game against the mighty Blue Hose, who apparently had a tough game against the powerhouse North Greenville until pulling away in the 4th. No matter how you spin it, Wofford essentially has no passing game.
And if I wanted to go on about something, it would be the chop block that #85 threw on Breitenstein's TD. That was as cheap a shot as I've seen in a long time.
"But the damned and the guiltiest among you are the men who had the capacity to know, yet chose to blank out reality, the men who were willing to sell their intelligence into cynical servitude..."
- John Galt
- John Galt
-
- Level3
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
And that has WHAT to do with our pass defense in defending BQ? We've seriously thrown probably the same 2 or 3 pass plays the last 20 attempts as they all look eerily similar ( Pass on the right to wide out across the middle. Wide receiver streak). They more than likely are. It's not supposed to be Great, it's supposed to be good enough to keep the secondary honest and not in the box the whole game, which it did against Clemson as they backed off on the run game and we were able to rush for 270 afterwards. Yeah we completed only 2 passes, but the starting QB only threw 7 times.....If your QB only had 5 incompletions you'd be jumping for joy. We go for the homerun ball and we were able to do that and have been able to that so far this year.Aho Old Guy wrote:youngterrier wrote:
We've passed for an average of 150 yards the last 2 games which is pretty good for an option team....I don't know what you're getting at with that one![]()
Dude. Reality check. Wofford completed 2 passes against Clempson. On the first there wasn't a DB within 15 yds of your receiver. On the second, I believe it WAS from the shotgun and the receiver got away when 2 Clemson DBs bounced off of each other trying to make the tackle.
I have no opinion of your vaulted aerial game against the mighty Blue Hose, who apparently had a tough game against the powerhouse North Greenville until pulling away in the 4th. No matter how you spin it, Wofford essentially has no passing game.
And if I wanted to go on about something, it would be the chop block that #85 threw on Breitenstein's TD. That was as cheap a shot as I've seen in a long time.
And, having been at most every Wofford game the last 4 or 5 years, we ARE a shotgun team. We've run probably 60 or 70% of our plays in the last few years from the gun and in the first 2 weeks we've probably run 60 or 70% from under center in the flexbone. The players have even said they've been working out of the pistol this summer and in fall camp but we've seen it few times and when we did it's only been a simple option or handoff, and we see that even sparingly.
As for the chop blcok, From the looks of things it was his assignment to go for the DE, where as the DE tried to make contact with the other TE (who was going for another block and did not engage him in a block). It didn't seem dirty to me, it could have been called a chop block, but I don't think it was dirty. What's your deal? first you praise us then you're going on some tangent against us?
-
- Level3
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Clemson 35, Wofford 27
essentially, we don't need to pass 20 times a game effectively. If we get >100 yards passing a game or complete more than 3/4 of our passes, our passing game has done it's job because it's purpose in our offense is a gimmick play or something to keep the secondary honest, because if they sneak up too far we'll burn them. Bersin is a great receiver, who makes plays when you throw it to him (5 catches for about 160 yards so far this year).