Villanova football idea is dead

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
JBB
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4312
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:10 pm

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by JBB »

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:
JBB wrote:I did not know that! What year was the last win? NDSUs win over Big 12 CHARTER MEMBER Kansas Jayhawks was 2010. Besides, Is Oregon State a Charter Member of the PAC? :coffee:

This video might help. "Hard Core" KU Football fan after NDSU Loss:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmkMQLje ... re=related

Has Nova ever beaten a BE Football team in modern history?
The last time they scheduled us was in 1996. We flat out waxed their ass but they came back in garbage time to cut the final score down to 35-14.

A couple years before that Oregon needed a Bill Fette type to salvage a win for them in Autzen when we were on our way to a victory in the red zone. We lost that one 35-30 but I think it proves to the PAC that we definitely belong there and with all those relationships we've built we are a shoe in.

You must have missed that part in my post questioning how a win at MT would keep you out of a conference but a win at Kansas is somehow an asset? Just trying to get the "wet dream" thinking down here JBB.
Were you guys D2 back then?

I was just pointing out that The NDSU BISON are a competive ball team worthy of the BSC, the Big 12 or the MAC. We have wins in all three. Conferences make their own choices and Im sure UND was as good as it gets for the BSC. The MVFC thoughtfully figured out their future as did the Summit.

Now the Big East is making a pick. Its confusing but interesting.
Dear Lord, We come before you and humbly ask you to grant our prayer for a veil of protection to be placed over Donald Trump. May your will be done. In Jesus name we pray. Amen
Ursus A. Horribilis
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 21614
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
A.K.A.: Bill Brasky

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by Ursus A. Horribilis »

JBB wrote:
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: The last time they scheduled us was in 1996. We flat out waxed their ass but they came back in garbage time to cut the final score down to 35-14.

A couple years before that Oregon needed a Bill Fette type to salvage a win for them in Autzen when we were on our way to a victory in the red zone. We lost that one 35-30 but I think it proves to the PAC that we definitely belong there and with all those relationships we've built we are a shoe in.

You must have missed that part in my post questioning how a win at MT would keep you out of a conference but a win at Kansas is somehow an asset? Just trying to get the "wet dream" thinking down here JBB.
Were you guys D2 back then?

I was just pointing out that The NDSU BISON are a competive ball team worthy of the BSC, the Big 12 or the MAC. We have wins in all three. Conferences make their own choices and Im sure UND was as good as it gets for the BSC. The MVFC thoughtfully figured out their future as did the Summit.

Now the Big East is making a pick. Its confusing but interesting.
Where the fuck did UND even come into this conversation? What the hell is wrong with you slick?

It's a hell of a resume you post there and they would of course be lucky to have you based on that alone. :lol:
JBB
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4312
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:10 pm

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by JBB »

Villanova is being handed a perfect football conference situation. Nice travel, established rivals, profitable basketball and conference payouts. I dont know what those payouts might be but the revenues will be new. Not too shabby if they think they can handle the extra expenses.

NDSU did want into the BSC and why not? We had been invited once in the mid 70s and turned it down. Our president was from MSU and there was a long history with both Montana schools. Looking back its lucky we didnt get in. It would have added huge travel costs and had little revenue upside on top of what we were experiencing. The GWC was worse but we had no choice. Not exactly a Nova deal.

From where we are sitting getting into the MVFC/Summit looks a lot more like the Nova deal than the BSC did with a good footprint providing travel savings and old rivals in our geographic area. Confernce payouts arent huge, if any, but we do have the NCAA autobid. We paid a pretty penny to get in and it was worth it.

I havent heard anything about an entrance fee for Villanova, but with membership for most sports all ready my guess is the deal is zero dollar? If so, its just another bonus.
Dear Lord, We come before you and humbly ask you to grant our prayer for a veil of protection to be placed over Donald Trump. May your will be done. In Jesus name we pray. Amen
User avatar
collegesportsinfo
Level1
Level1
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:43 pm
I am a fan of: UMass
A.K.A.: Quinn, KingCal

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by collegesportsinfo »

UNI88 wrote:
collegesportsinfo wrote:
JBB, this isn't an discussion on faith of fans...as if it were trying to contemplate if there is or is not a God.

When it comes to NDSU and the Big 12, it is more like a discussion about whether there is or is not an Easter Bunny or Santa Claus.

To put it bluntly, NDSU could build that 200k stadium, crank it up in their state, and guess what...they will still be outside the BCS. Few programs could have done as much as Boise St. did, but at no time whatsoever was Boise St. ever considered for the Pac-12. Had Colorado not been an option, it still would have been Utah and a school other than Boise St.

I put out the scenarios a page or two ago. That's it. There will not be a place for NDSU in the Big Ten as they'll always have their pick of the litter. The Big 12...if they expanded, they have all of Big East (Louisville), MWC, CUSA to choose from. That's a big list with something NDSU will NEVER be able to offer the Big 12...the most important element...TV market penetration. Louisville, BYU, New Mexico, UNLV all do. Houston, TCU, and the other Texas schools have the potential. Even Boise St. would be in the Big 12 mix if brought in with BYU.

We get it, you're a big fan. And it's commendable. But there also needs to be some sense of reality for every fan that needs to be embraced. I love UMass, but I know the ACC isn't going to knock on our doors....ever.
True! It's all about the tv sets and the state of North Dakota doesn't have enough of them. And before you argue that Nebraska didn't either, Nebraska has a national following and people all over the country will tune in to Nebraska vs. Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, etc.

NDSU (and UND) might dominate North Dakota but there aren't enough people there. Nova might be in a market of 4 million people but they follow NFL and Penn State football.
Exactly. You can add Alabama, Auburn, Ole Miss, Miss St, Missouri, etc as well...a number of schools in small markets that have huge state followings regardless of being in small markets themselves...and states with larger population bases.

I'm on the record of being in favor of mass upgrades by FCS schools like NDSU, my own UMass, Montana, UD, JMU, and others. But the current rules (pushed by the FCS schools) says you need an invite from an existing FBS conference. So any group migration of MVFC schools, even teaming with Big Sky schools is out of the question. Just like in the east, you won't ever see UMass, UD, JMU, App St, etc jump up to FBS together for a new conference.

I for one would love to see NDSU in FBS, But only in the comfort of a conference of what would be other lower FBS schools like the MAC...because other than the WAC, it's the only option.

Fret not NDSU fans...most of us are in the same boat or something similar. UMass has the MAC as an option...and only the MAC. Gotta figure that schools like App St and Charlotte only have the Sunbelt as a realistic immediate option along with the WAC. Even Mighty Montana only has one immediate option: the WAC. So none of these posts should be taken as a knock on the fine program at NDSU. It's just the reality of the situation, that there are just so few options.
- Quinn

CollegeSportsInfo.com:
NCAA Message Board Directory, Conference Realignment Forums & Expansion News



Image
User avatar
collegesportsinfo
Level1
Level1
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:43 pm
I am a fan of: UMass
A.K.A.: Quinn, KingCal

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by collegesportsinfo »

As for Villanova, the article today is still just speculation. Nothing official.

As fans of FCs schools considering FBS, it's a shame the system doesn't make it as easy as it is for Villanova. I can think of about 10 east coast FCS schools that would have taken a single day to accept a Big East invite is offered. Top of the list UMass, App st, JMU, UD, ODU, GA St, Charlotte...list goes on and on...
- Quinn

CollegeSportsInfo.com:
NCAA Message Board Directory, Conference Realignment Forums & Expansion News



Image
Ursus A. Horribilis
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 21614
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
A.K.A.: Bill Brasky

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by Ursus A. Horribilis »

JBB wrote:Villanova is being handed a perfect football conference situation. Nice travel, established rivals, profitable basketball and conference payouts. I dont know what those payouts might be but the revenues will be new. Not too shabby if they think they can handle the extra expenses.

NDSU did want into the BSC and why not? We had been invited once in the mid 70s and turned it down. Our president was from MSU and there was a long history with both Montana schools. Looking back its lucky we didnt get in. It would have added huge travel costs and had little revenue upside on top of what we were experiencing. The GWC was worse but we had no choice. Not exactly a Nova deal.

From where we are sitting getting into the MVFC/Summit looks a lot more like the Nova deal than the BSC did with a good footprint providing travel savings and old rivals in our geographic area. Confernce payouts arent huge, if any, but we do have the NCAA autobid. We paid a pretty penny to get in and it was worth it.

I havent heard anything about an entrance fee for Villanova, but with membership for most sports all ready my guess is the deal is zero dollar? If so, its just another bonus.
You sir went from making absolutely no sense to making a post that is completely solid in it's application. Nothing there I could disagree with. :thumb:
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39227
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by 89Hen »

collegesportsinfo wrote:I can think of about 10 east coast FCS schools that would have taken a single day to accept a Big East invite is offered. Top of the list UMass, App st, JMU, UD, ODU, GA St, Charlotte...list goes on and on...
But the invite isn't coming any time in our lives so...
Image
User avatar
henfan
Level1
Level1
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:10 pm
I am a fan of: Delaware

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by henfan »

collegesportsinfo wrote:As for Villanova, the article today is still just speculation. Nothing official.

As fans of FCs schools considering FBS, it's a shame the system doesn't make it as easy as it is for Villanova. I can think of about 10 east coast FCS schools that would have taken a single day to accept a Big East invite is offered. Top of the list UMass, App st, JMU, UD, ODU, GA St, Charlotte...list goes on and on...
In fairness though, none of the schools you mention would face the types of obstacles VU would face with FBS FB, particularly with respect to being landlocked/stadium access.
Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 30320
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by BDKJMU »

collegesportsinfo wrote:As for Villanova, the article today is still just speculation. Nothing official.

As fans of FCs schools considering FBS, it's a shame the system doesn't make it as easy as it is for Villanova. I can think of about 10 east coast FCS schools that would have taken a single day to accept a Big East invite is offered. Top of the list UMass, App st, JMU, UD, ODU, GA St, Charlotte...list goes on and on...
YSU, Liberty, GSU....
Proud deplorable Ultra MAGA fascist NAZI trash clinging to my guns and religion (and whatever else I’ve been labeled by Obama/Clinton/Biden/Harris).
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Image
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions.
User avatar
collegesportsinfo
Level1
Level1
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:43 pm
I am a fan of: UMass
A.K.A.: Quinn, KingCal

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by collegesportsinfo »

89Hen wrote:
collegesportsinfo wrote:I can think of about 10 east coast FCS schools that would have taken a single day to accept a Big East invite is offered. Top of the list UMass, App st, JMU, UD, ODU, GA St, Charlotte...list goes on and on...
But the invite isn't coming any time in our lives so...
Yup. But within context, it makes sense: all our schools would jump at it, yet Nova is taking forever. Sad.
- Quinn

CollegeSportsInfo.com:
NCAA Message Board Directory, Conference Realignment Forums & Expansion News



Image
User avatar
collegesportsinfo
Level1
Level1
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:43 pm
I am a fan of: UMass
A.K.A.: Quinn, KingCal

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by collegesportsinfo »

henfan wrote:
collegesportsinfo wrote:As for Villanova, the article today is still just speculation. Nothing official.

As fans of FCs schools considering FBS, it's a shame the system doesn't make it as easy as it is for Villanova. I can think of about 10 east coast FCS schools that would have taken a single day to accept a Big East invite is offered. Top of the list UMass, App st, JMU, UD, ODU, GA St, Charlotte...list goes on and on...
In fairness though, none of the schools you mention would face the types of obstacles VU would face with FBS FB, particularly with respect to being landlocked/stadium access.
Indeed. Which makes it that much more sad for fans of the other schools. Meanwhile schools like JMU, UD, UMass in FCS as well as FBS programs like Memphis, UCF, Houston, ECU, etc are on the outside watching Nova (with all the issues you mentioned) being invited. As a UMass fan, I have no worries because the Big East was never an option for us. But I couldn't imagine being a UCF, Memphis or ECU fan right now. Each would seem to be a better option than Nova. Really hurt for ECU fans. They've wanted in the BE since it's inception, and have had better followings than some programs...only to see 5 to 6 schools added to the Big East instead of them over the years.

In a way, there is something familiar about the Nova/BE move, like with the CAA and NU. Reasons are different (so CAA could get sponsorship). Villanova is being invited to the Big East because they have good FCS football, are in a market the conference wants for the sport, and most importantly, are already in the big East. It's that 1 criteria of Nova already being in the Big East that puts them at the top of the list over say, Temple. Much like with the CAA, they added NU ahead of so many better candidates, simply because NU had football...despite a school in the same city like BU being much better for the CAA (facilities, academics, market penetration, program strength). But that 1 criteria...NU having football put them at the top...and for Nova and the Big East, the 1 criteria of Nova already in the Big East puts them at the top (over Temple in the same city).
- Quinn

CollegeSportsInfo.com:
NCAA Message Board Directory, Conference Realignment Forums & Expansion News



Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 22970
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by UNI88 »

Does Nova really give the Big East much pentration of the Philly market?

Or is the reality that when it comes to football the Eagles are the big dogs and those that are interested in college football follow Penn St?

What is the sports priority order in Philly? Something like this?
Eagles
Phillies
Flyers
76ers
Penn St football
Big 5 basketball
High school or CYO basketball

How high can Nova football hope to climb the list?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18473
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by GannonFan »

UNI88 wrote:Does Nova really give the Big East much pentration of the Philly market?

Or is the reality that when it comes to football the Eagles are the big dogs and those that are interested in college football follow Penn St?

What is the sports priority order in Philly? Something like this?
Eagles
Phillies
Flyers
76ers
Penn St football
Big 5 basketball
High school or CYO basketball

How high can Nova football hope to climb the list?
In reality, it doesn't matter - the top 3 completely dominate the sports scene - everything else is a way to pass the time until we can focus on the other 3 again. But I'd put Big 5 basketball over Penn St football. But after the top 3, there really is no market to capitalize on.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
BigSkyBears
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:31 pm
I am a fan of: Northern Colorado

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by BigSkyBears »

JBB wrote:
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: The last time they scheduled us was in 1996. We flat out waxed their ass but they came back in garbage time to cut the final score down to 35-14.

A couple years before that Oregon needed a Bill Fette type to salvage a win for them in Autzen when we were on our way to a victory in the red zone. We lost that one 35-30 but I think it proves to the PAC that we definitely belong there and with all those relationships we've built we are a shoe in.

You must have missed that part in my post questioning how a win at MT would keep you out of a conference but a win at Kansas is somehow an asset? Just trying to get the "wet dream" thinking down here JBB.
Were you guys D2 back then?

I was just pointing out that The NDSU BISON are a competive ball team worthy of the BSC, the Big 12 or the MAC. We have wins in all three. Conferences make their own choices and Im sure UND was as good as it gets for the BSC. The MVFC thoughtfully figured out their future as did the Summit.

Now the Big East is making a pick. Its confusing but interesting.
I know you've lost credibility on here a long time ago, but this just solidifies it.
Image
JBB
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4312
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:10 pm

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by JBB »

You sir are a complete idiot. :twocents: :clap:

You may now go back to your important nodding and murmering. :lol:
Dear Lord, We come before you and humbly ask you to grant our prayer for a veil of protection to be placed over Donald Trump. May your will be done. In Jesus name we pray. Amen
BigSkyBears
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:31 pm
I am a fan of: Northern Colorado

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by BigSkyBears »

JBB wrote:You sir are a complete idiot. :twocents: :clap:

You may now go back to your important nodding and murmering. :lol:
To think NDSU belongs in the same sentence with CU, Texas, Texas AM, Oklahoma etc. Is ridicules. I live in Big 12 country (CO) and believe no one knows who NDSU. Most don't even know there's a D1 school and if they do, they get it mixed in with the Sue. I know you're an ubber-fan, but let's stop the hyperboles.
Image
Franks Tanks
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:36 am
I am a fan of: Lafayette College
A.K.A.: Big Sexy

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by Franks Tanks »

GannonFan wrote:
UNI88 wrote:Does Nova really give the Big East much pentration of the Philly market?

Or is the reality that when it comes to football the Eagles are the big dogs and those that are interested in college football follow Penn St?

What is the sports priority order in Philly? Something like this?
Eagles
Phillies
Flyers
76ers
Penn St football
Big 5 basketball
High school or CYO basketball

How high can Nova football hope to climb the list?
In reality, it doesn't matter - the top 3 completely dominate the sports scene - everything else is a way to pass the time until we can focus on the other 3 again. But I'd put Big 5 basketball over Penn St football. But after the top 3, there really is no market to capitalize on.

Right-- even Penn State is rarely mentioned in Philly except by Penn State alums. I was at a party this fall and the Penn State -Alabama game was spurned in favor of a pretty meaningless late season Phillies game. I snuck off to a different room with a Penn State grad who wanted to watch the game. Nobody else joined us.

People care about pro sports in Philly with virtually no exceptions. Nova has a good basketball following, and when another Big 5 schools like Temple or St. Joe's is having a good season they will get some traction, but that is about it. This is why Nova is having such a hard time deciding what to do. For just about every program a jump to a BCS league would be a no brainer, but Nova realizes they may have serious issues with attendance and they seem to be having tremendous difficulty deciding if they can make this work.
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by bluehenbillk »

Correct - Philly is a pro sports town. 2 teams, the Phillies & Eagles dominate the coverage and attention. Flyers & Sixers are ditant 3rd & 4th's. College hoops is next ('Nova, Temple & St. Joe's probably get the most attention of that bunch) but it's considerably behind the pro teams, basically you need to be ranked if you want much attention at all. College football is even further back than hoops as there is no dominant team of interest, only so many people went to/care about Penn State. When people talk about Villanova/Delaware the 1st thing they say is "well they're in what Division 1-aa?" and when people mention temple they say "what league are they in again?" or "yea, all 500 people that goto those games".
Make Delaware Football Great Again
User avatar
collegesportsinfo
Level1
Level1
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:43 pm
I am a fan of: UMass
A.K.A.: Quinn, KingCal

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by collegesportsinfo »

bluehenbillk wrote:Correct - Philly is a pro sports town. 2 teams, the Phillies & Eagles dominate the coverage and attention. Flyers & Sixers are ditant 3rd & 4th's. College hoops is next ('Nova, Temple & St. Joe's probably get the most attention of that bunch) but it's considerably behind the pro teams, basically you need to be ranked if you want much attention at all. College football is even further back than hoops as there is no dominant team of interest, only so many people went to/care about Penn State. When people talk about Villanova/Delaware the 1st thing they say is "well they're in what Division 1-aa?" and when people mention temple they say "what league are they in again?" or "yea, all 500 people that goto those games".
Which is why the base enrollment at a school is so important versus other cities. Nova is just too small a school IMHO for FBs football to work. Because for it to work for a smaller school, you really need to be the only game in town. Which is why I don't mind arguing that Temple, as an all-sports members of a 12-team/post-split Big East, might have a better chance to work. You'd have some big names coming in for football and regional rivals like Rutgers, Pitt, WVU. But the rivalries would grow for other sports. No longer would the teams hoops schedules be loaded with games like DePaul, Marquette, Providence, Seton hall, etc. Instead, it would be all larger schools, mostly state schools, building rivalries of like-minded schools.

But as we know, that is a 100x a longer shot that nova in the Big East...which most feel would not work for them. Poor Philly.
- Quinn

CollegeSportsInfo.com:
NCAA Message Board Directory, Conference Realignment Forums & Expansion News



Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39227
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by 89Hen »

bluehenbillk wrote:Correct - Philly is a pro sports town. 2 teams, the Phillies & Eagles dominate the coverage and attention. Flyers & Sixers are ditant 3rd & 4th's. College hoops is next.
1. Union
2. Penn track
3. Wings

then the Eagles. 8-)
Image
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by bluehenbillk »

89Hen wrote:
bluehenbillk wrote:Correct - Philly is a pro sports town. 2 teams, the Phillies & Eagles dominate the coverage and attention. Flyers & Sixers are ditant 3rd & 4th's. College hoops is next.
1. Union
2. Penn track
3. Wings

then the Eagles. 8-)
The Union had their home opener on Saturday, it got mentioned for all of about 20 seconds or so, around the 20-minute mark of CSN's 30-minute broadcast on Saturday. It's a fringe sport/team in Philly, just like the Wings.
Make Delaware Football Great Again
User avatar
Fact
Level1
Level1
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:41 am
I am a fan of: Villanova
A.K.A.: meek millz

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by Fact »

The Villanova-Syracuse Lacrosse game on saturday had a legit 10k crowd. Proof that Villanova can draw if they play against Big East rivals in their marquee sports.
http://twitter.com/TheFoyeEffect" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Franks Tanks
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:36 am
I am a fan of: Lafayette College
A.K.A.: Big Sexy

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by Franks Tanks »

Fact wrote:The Villanova-Syracuse Lacrosse game on saturday had a legit 10k crowd. Proof that Villanova can draw if they play against Big East rivals in their marquee sports.

There were 6,200 people there according to the Nova website.

http://www.villanova.com/sports/m-lacro ... 11aaa.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The attendance is impressive considering UVA at Hopkins only drew 3,200 this past weekend, but still not near 10k.
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by 93henfan »

With a school-record crowd of 6,289 in attendance, No. 7 Villanova (7-2, 0-1 BIG EAST) played their best defensive game of the season despite falling in their first BIG EAST matchup of the year against the Orange. The loss moves Villanova to 7-2 overall and 0-1 in conference, while Syracuse improved to 7-0, 2-0, respectively.

The match also marked the first lacrosse game between two top-10 teams in Villanova Stadium.
http://www.villanova.com/sports/m-lacro ... 11aaa.html

I'd say the draw was the #1 team in the land.
Last edited by 93henfan on Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
Fact
Level1
Level1
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:41 am
I am a fan of: Villanova
A.K.A.: meek millz

Re: Villanova football idea is dead

Post by Fact »

as someone who was there.. that number is false. If a stadium fits 12,500 and the larger of the two sides is completely filled, and the other is 80 percent full, doesn't that equal more than 6,300?
http://twitter.com/TheFoyeEffect" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply