cats2506 wrote:
that single call had no more effect than several other bad calls in the game, and other (non reffing) factors had a bigger impact than bad calls on the final outcome of the game.
that should provide some clarification as to my position
Once again for the reading challenged,
or does it need to be in large type again
So a call that take 4 points off of the board has no more of an impact than calls that didn't take points off the board? Really, that is your logic on this.
I'm done with this. You actually ARE sitting there and claiming those points wouldn't have had an impact on this one. Wow. All this time I thought it was just a schtick.
So a call that take 4 points off of the board has no more of an impact than calls that didn't take points off the board? Really, that is your logic on this.
I'm done with this. You actually ARE sitting there and claiming those points wouldn't have had an impact on this one. Wow. All this time I thought it was just a schtick.
Some of those other calls took points off the board by killing MSU drives, so yes they have the same effect
What, you are the one that wanted this out in the open forum, so that SE and the rest of your douchebag friends could help you out, now you want to quit
Last edited by cats2506 on Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Scatfan2506, you couldn't act like a whinier bitch if you tried.
SD wanted to be an a**hole, I just want him to know who he is F**King with
Bitch please. I didn't need anyone help proving your douchbaggery. I just get a laugh at your double standard on the calls and your blatant and shameless homerism and spinning of the events that happened.
cats2506 wrote:So SD are you still maintaining your opinion that the BSC refs will always favor a Montana team over SAC
"yes" or "no" will do
Due to past events, yes. Will they always get the calls, I **** hope not. And yes this is a biased response, but at least I can acknowledge that.
so even when proven wrong by the conference beyond all reasonable doubt you still wont admit that the 2010 game never should have gone to OT and that the refs are still biased against you and in favor of the MT schools
that is new heights of douchebaggery, even SE doesnt go that far
SDHornet wrote:
Due to past events, yes. Will they always get the calls, I **** hope not. And yes this is a biased response, but at least I can acknowledge that.
so even when proven wrong by the conference beyond all reasonable doubt you still wont admit that the 2010 game never should have gone to OT and that the refs are still biased against you and in favor of the MT schools
that is new heights of douchebaggery, even SE doesnt go that far
This thread with a lot of responses from you has rubbed off on me.
so even when proven wrong by the conference beyond all reasonable doubt you still wont admit that the 2010 game never should have gone to OT and that the refs are still biased against you and in favor of the MT schools
that is new heights of douchebaggery, even SE doesnt go that far
This thread with a lot of responses to you has rubbed off on me.
SDHornet wrote:
This thread with a lot of responses to you has rubbed off on me.
I thought you quit,
This thread is a train wreck that no matter how hard you want to not look and stay away, you just can't help yourself. Besides this thread is keeping me from getting back to work.
This thread is a train wreck that no matter how hard you want to not look and stay away, you just can't help yourself. Besides this thread is keeping me from getting back to work.
I will let you go back to work then, until next year
PS I still think SAC is a playoff team if they beat UCD, like I said in the PM
SDHornet wrote:
This thread is a train wreck that no matter how hard you want to not look and stay away, you just can't help yourself. Besides this thread is keeping me from getting back to work.
I will let you go back to work then, until next year
PS I still think SAC is a playoff team if they beat UCD, like I said in the PM
I don't think we play next year which is a shame. But at least it means we won't get screwed by the refs. (Ok that was a joke but I couldn't help it. )
I don't think we get in with 7 wins. I just think there will be too many other 7 win teams and I have no idea how the committee will pick the at-larges, especially if there are 4 other BSC teams with 7+ wins. Nobody picked us to be where we are right now (including me) and it has been an enjoyable ride regardless of the off the field issues, blown calls and whatever else has gone on this season.
Like I've said MSU is a good team and there are some playmakers on that roster. The potential is there to have a run in the post season, but there have been a ton of close calls for you guys. Enjoy the rest of your season.
cats2506 wrote:
I will let you go back to work then, until next year
PS I still think SAC is a playoff team if they beat UCD, like I said in the PM
I don't think we play next year which is a shame. But at least it means we won't get screwed by the refs. (Ok that was a joke but I couldn't help it. )
I don't think we get in with 7 wins. I just think there will be too many other 7 win teams and I have no idea how the committee will pick the at-larges, especially if there are 4 other BSC teams with 7+ wins. Nobody picked us to be where we are right now (including me) and it has been an enjoyable ride regardless of the off the field issues, blown calls and whatever else has gone on this season.
Like I've said MSU is a good team and there are some playmakers on that roster. The potential is there to have a run in the post season, but there have been a ton of close calls for you guys. Enjoy the rest of your season.
There will be several 7 win bubble teams, in your favor you have an all DI schedule, and a win over an FBS
There wont be many of the other bubble teams that have those credentials, but then again they might not let you in iust because your not a Montana team
SDHornet wrote:
I don't think we play next year which is a shame. But at least it means we won't get screwed by the refs. (Ok that was a joke but I couldn't help it. )
I don't think we get in with 7 wins. I just think there will be too many other 7 win teams and I have no idea how the committee will pick the at-larges, especially if there are 4 other BSC teams with 7+ wins. Nobody picked us to be where we are right now (including me) and it has been an enjoyable ride regardless of the off the field issues, blown calls and whatever else has gone on this season.
Like I've said MSU is a good team and there are some playmakers on that roster. The potential is there to have a run in the post season, but there have been a ton of close calls for you guys. Enjoy the rest of your season.
There will be several 7 win bubble teams, in your favor you have an all DI schedule, and a win over an FBS
There wont be many of the other bubble teams that have those credentials, but then again they might not let you in iust because your not a Montana team
Well the other Montana team won't hit the 7 D-1 win minimum so no need to worry there. Depends on how our resume' stacks up with other 7 win teams resume's. We have never been to the playoffs so that might be taken into consideration, and if there are already a bunch of BSC teams selected that might count against us. Regardless it doesn't matter if we don't take care of business in 2 weeks. A 7-4 (5-3) season is definitely a step in the right direction.
SDHornet wrote:
Due to past events, yes. Will they always get the calls, I **** hope not. And yes this is a biased response, but at least I can acknowledge that.
so even when proven wrong by the conference beyond all reasonable doubt you still wont admit that the 2010 game never should have gone to OT and that the refs are still biased against you and in favor of the MT schools
that is new heights of douchebaggery, even SE doesnt go that far
Once again, you're projecting onto others. Everyone knows you're the biggest douche on the internet. I'm pretty sure you have Razor "topped," both figuratively and literally.
so even when proven wrong by the conference beyond all reasonable doubt you still wont admit that the 2010 game never should have gone to OT and that the refs are still biased against you and in favor of the MT schools
that is new heights of douchebaggery, even SE doesnt go that far
Once again, you're projecting onto others. Everyone knows you're the biggest douche on the internet. I'm pretty sure you have Razor "topped," both figuratively and literally.
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Once again, you're projecting onto others. Everyone knows you're the biggest douche on the internet. I'm pretty sure you have Razor "topped," both figuratively and literally.
Having looked at the records, SD, I don't think the issue here is Sac competing against other 7-4 teams. I think we have the best resume of all potential 7-4 teams. I think the issue is whether or not our resume at 7-4 beats out the resumes of some at 8-3 (and some of the weaker 9-2s like Albany, which likely just blew the NEC auto-bid). I felt that our B(C)$ win, defeat of a then-#11, and near-losses against a then-#1 and a then-#3 outweighs some of those to just BARELY squeak in. Others may have a pretty good argument otherwise (even without ECB, which is another story altogether). But I think THAT is where our issue lies. Treating UCD like ISU MAY help some, but given ECB AND the relative equality (to ours) of schedules that are finishing 8-3, we're probably done based on THAT, NOT on our rank against other 7-4s.
SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:2506 and other bitchkitten fans are trying to detract away from the fact that they're right on track for getting blown out by the Griz, and another early playoff exit.
A season ago, Montana State capped October with a resounding trouncing of Idaho State in Bobcat Stadium. In the victory, MSU rushed for 415 yards in a 54-13 demolition of the Bengals, spoiling former MSU head coach Mike Kramer’s return to the Gallatin Valley. Some would say it was the peak performance of MSU’s season.
The next week, Montana State needed a feverish comeback to down Weber State. Two weeks later, the then-No. 1 Bobcats were steamrolled by the Montana Grizzlies in Bozeman, 36-10.
Hey! I don't think all Eagles fans are pains in the ass just because of what you post. Kindly refrain from BS like that above. I haven't seen any other Cat fans saying that.
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:2506 and other bitchkitten fans are trying to detract away from the fact that they're right on track for getting blown out by the Griz, and another early playoff exit.
Hey! I don't think all Eagles fans are pains in the ass just because of what you post. Kindly refrain from BS like that above. I haven't seen any other Cat fans saying that.
Fair enough. I've just encountered most of them lately, ones like 2506, FTG06, etc. You're certainly not included in that group... you're a Bobcat. Those others are bitchkittens.
