Montana Signing Day
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:13 pm
We got everyone we wanted and if they didnt sign with us we didnt want them anyway..........................
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12661
Are you certain they weren't grey-shirt offers?ronbo wrote:Oregon 6A Offensive Player of the Year
Washington Defensive Player of the Year
Washington 2A-3A Offensive Player of the Year
13 All-State players of 19 recruits
10 Scout or Rivals 2 stars
4 players that chose Montana over FBS offers and multiple offers, Kirschner had offers from Army, Air Force, and UNLV.
This is a nice class and they are big!
ronbo wrote:Oregon 6A Offensive Player of the Year
Washington Defensive Player of the Year
Washington 2A-3A Offensive Player of the Year
13 All-State players of 19 recruits
10 Scout or Rivals 2 stars
4 players that chose Montana over FBS offers and multiple offers, Kirschner had offers from Army, Air Force, and UNLV.
This is a nice class and they are big!
You can critique our recruiting AFTER you get your first win against Montana sometime after the year 2030.BigSkyBears wrote:ronbo wrote:Oregon 6A Offensive Player of the Year
Washington Defensive Player of the Year
Washington 2A-3A Offensive Player of the Year
13 All-State players of 19 recruits
10 Scout or Rivals 2 stars
4 players that chose Montana over FBS offers and multiple offers, Kirschner had offers from Army, Air Force, and UNLV.
This is a nice class and they are big!
That's cool, but we're I think we're ranked higher than you according to Rivals.com. We also have a 2 star d-lineman that will probably fax his LOI tonight. Other wise, great job!
Yep!Savage Paw wrote:You can critique our recruiting AFTER you get your first win against Montana sometime after the year 2010BigSkyBears wrote:
That's cool, but we're I think we're ranked higher than you according to Rivals.com. We also have a 2 star d-lineman that will probably fax his LOI tonight. Other wise, great job!
Montana will win a 3rd NC before UNC beats Montana.BigSkyBears wrote:Yep!Savage Paw wrote:
You can critique our recruiting AFTER you get your first win against Montana sometime after the year 2010
Savage Paw wrote:BigSky Bears can't really believe they are going to beat us.
AZGrizFan wrote:Montana will win 3 more NCs before UNC beats Montana.BigSkyBears wrote:
Yep!
I don't usually get sucked in to these types of conversations, but you can't really be serious. UNC will never get the type of recruiting class Montana gets, it's just the way it is.BigSkyBears wrote:ronbo wrote:Oregon 6A Offensive Player of the Year
Washington Defensive Player of the Year
Washington 2A-3A Offensive Player of the Year
13 All-State players of 19 recruits
10 Scout or Rivals 2 stars
4 players that chose Montana over FBS offers and multiple offers, Kirschner had offers from Army, Air Force, and UNLV.
This is a nice class and they are big!
That's cool, but we're I think we're ranked higher than you according to Rivals.com. We also have a 2 star d-lineman that will probably fax his LOI tonight. Other wise, great job!
Alright, see for yourself. Check the rankings for rivals. I could be wrong, but I didn't see UM ahead of UNC. Sac St actually is a few spots ahead.Willie wrote:I don't usually get sucked in to these types of conversations, but you can't really be serious. UNC will never get the type of recruiting class Montana gets, it's just the way it is.BigSkyBears wrote:
That's cool, but we're I think we're ranked higher than you according to Rivals.com. We also have a 2 star d-lineman that will probably fax his LOI tonight. Other wise, great job!
Well you should go back and look and see if Montana has EVER had a good recruiting class according to the rankings and see how that has compared to what is done on the field.BigSkyBears wrote:Alright, see for yourself. Check the rankings for rivals. I could be wrong, but I didn't see UM ahead of UNC. Sac St actually is a few spots ahead.Willie wrote: I don't usually get sucked in to these types of conversations, but you can't really be serious. UNC will never get the type of recruiting class Montana gets, it's just the way it is.
Yeah....means a lot All these teams are listed ahead of us.....PLEASE!BigSkyBears wrote:
Alright, see for yourself. Check the rankings for rivals. I could be wrong, but I didn't see UM ahead of UNC. Sac St actually is a few spots ahead.
Must be nice being the only ticket in town. We've got to compete against 3 FBS teams two of them within 1 hour driving distance and one of which is a BCS school, plus a professional franchise. Keep up the good work!kemajic wrote:One type of recruit goes where there are 2500 butts in the seats; another goes where there are 25,000. We prefer the latter. It's working out pretty well.
You guys drew more fans when you were D-II. So why don't you get better attendance now?BigSkyBears wrote:Must be nice being the only ticket in town. We've got to compete against 3 FBS teams two of them within 1 hour driving distance and one of which is a BCS school, plus a professional franchise. Keep up the good work!kemajic wrote:One type of recruit goes where there are 2500 butts in the seats; another goes where there are 25,000. We prefer the latter. It's working out pretty well.
Population Greeley, Co. - 98596BigSkyBears wrote:Must be nice being the only ticket in town. We've got to compete against 3 FBS teams two of them within 1 hour driving distance and one of which is a BCS school, plus a professional franchise. Keep up the good work!kemajic wrote:One type of recruit goes where there are 2500 butts in the seats; another goes where there are 25,000. We prefer the latter. It's working out pretty well.
I love that argument. Don't pay any attention to your population base there in Clolorado.BigSkyBears wrote:Must be nice being the only ticket in town. We've got to compete against 3 FBS teams two of them within 1 hour driving distance and one of which is a BCS school, plus a professional franchise. Keep up the good work!kemajic wrote:One type of recruit goes where there are 2500 butts in the seats; another goes where there are 25,000. We prefer the latter. It's working out pretty well.
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: I love that argument. Don't pay any attention to your population base there in Clolorado.
CSU Stadium-34,400
Colorado-60,000 (on a good day)
Denver Bronco's (rarely play on Saturday's but I'll throw it in for you anyway) 34,000
128,800 Total stadium attendace for those not named UNC Bears.
Population of Colorado-5,000,000
4,871,200 left out in the wind that could attend a UNC game.
You get 2500-3000 fans out of a leftover population that is nearly 5 times as big as our entire state as far as population goes?
Is it possible that people are not interested in seeing your team play because they are just not interesting to watch? Seriously, if you could notch up the amount of people that wanted to watch a game in your stadium to say---.00266874692 of those 4.8 million leftovers then you wouldn't have to try to make excuses that are so **** stupid.
.000615864674 % just isn't cutting it even though you are not the "top dog".
Hometown of Greeley-77,000
Hometown of Missoula-57,000
excuses for being pathetic aside I find it tough to buy into your story.
God damn it! I should have been quicker on the post as I had the same basic argument as above. Clear thinking in Montana...obviously.
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:I love that argument. Don't pay any attention to your population base there in Clolorado.BigSkyBears wrote:
Must be nice being the only ticket in town. We've got to compete against 3 FBS teams two of them within 1 hour driving distance and one of which is a BCS school, plus a professional franchise. Keep up the good work!
CSU Stadium-34,400
Colorado-60,000 (on a good day)
Denver Bronco's (rarely play on Saturday's but I'll throw it in for you anyway) 34,000
128,800 Total stadium attendace for those not named UNC Bears.
Population of Colorado-5,000,000
4,871,200 left out in the wind that could attend a UNC game.
You get 2500-3000 fans out of a leftover population that is nearly 5 times as big as our entire state as far as population goes?
Is it possible that people are not interested in seeing your team play because they are just not interesting to watch? Seriously, if you could notch up the amount of people that wanted to watch a game in your stadium to say---.00266874692 of those 4.8 million leftovers then you wouldn't have to try to make excuses that are so **** stupid.
.000615864674 % just isn't cutting it even though you are not the "top dog".
Hometown of Greeley-77,000
Hometown of Missoula-57,000
excuses for being pathetic aside I find it tough to buy into your story.
God damn it! I should have been quicker on the post as I had the same basic argument as above. Clear thinking in Montana...obviously.